Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Mueller Hearing

Comments

36 comments

  • WearyTraveler
    Didn?t watch. Anything new and exciting?
    0
  • TooBig
    Just liberal BS and a big waste of money and If I remember right wasn't Clinton impeached. Drain the swamp
    0
  • kimi
    Didn?t watch. Anything new and exciting?

    The day is still young...tune in if you get the chance. I'm getting bits and pieces due to being at the hospital.
    0
  • Spider7115
    Mueller sounds senile. It's like "I wrote the report but I didn't read it so I don't know what it says".

    He's directly contradicting things he said in the report, he asks for the page and paragraph repeatedly to read what he said in the report, he dodges questions with "I don't want to discuss that" or "I don't recall".

    Typical liberal Dog & Pony Show.
    0
  • kimi
    Spider7115 wrote:
    Mueller sounds senile. It's like "I wrote the report but I didn't read it so I don't know what it says".

    He's directly contradicting things he said in the report, he asks for the page and paragraph repeatedly to read what he said in the report, he dodges questions with "I don't want to discuss that" or "I don't recall".

    Typical liberal Dog & Pony Show.

    Agree. Republicans still see it as a Witch Hunt against Trump where Hildabeast started it in her attempt to become president, with Mueller and his cohorts and democratic associates protecting her and OBama. I halve no doubt that constitutes the facts of the matter.
    0
  • spasmcreek
    2024.......mueller rolled from rest home by hillary, both to testify.....i dont remember and i was robbed...ad inifnitum, ad nauseum.....
    0
  • mac10
    1000 page report and the dims refer to page# subsection # answer now :lol:
    0
  • dcon12
    Ain't a damn one mentioned any bricks! Don
    0
  • wiplash
    dcon12 wrote:
    Ain't a damn one mentioned any bricks! Don

    :)
    0
  • us55840
    Total waste of taxpayer funds paying these people who continue beating a dead horse.
    0
  • beneteau
    Quick&Dead wrote:
    Total waste of taxpayer funds paying these people who continue beating a dead horse.

    +1000----A crock of crap
    0
  • select-fire
    I am not answering that ... If they go for an impeachment.. good luck with that. :)
    0
  • wpageabc
    The reps from Texas kicked his mother loving butt.

    God Bless Texas.
    0
  • KenK/84Bravo
    I do not even need to tune in, in order to see what a Circus Freak type media extravaganza this is/was intended to be. BS from Start to Finish.


    Pass.
    0
  • yoshmyster
    More like mueller needs a "hearing aide". The way dude's running the clock by asking them to repeat the question then answers he can't talk about that. It was like grampa joined "Fight Club" but was too hard of hearing.

    The dems petting their lap dog and saying atta boy in code.
    0
  • kimi
    wpageabc wrote:
    The reps from Texas kicked his mother loving butt.

    God Bless Texas.

    Yeah Buddy, and no one is more deserving than Muler. Some other reps did a number on him as well.
    0
  • kimi
    .
    0
  • Smitty500mag
    Had the forefathers of this country been able to see how this country has turned out today I don't think they would have even bothered trying to fight the British for independence. Congress is a disgrace! All of Washington is not worth the rope it would take to hang them all.
    0
  • SG
    https://youtu.be/pct1uEhAqBQ
    0
  • us55840
    The crazy dems got some free TV exposure time.

    Other than that, a total joke.

    But on OUR DIME!
    :twisted:
    0
  • serf
    Smitty500mag wrote:
    Had the forefathers of this country been able to see how this country has turned out today I don't think they would have even bothered trying to fight the British for independence. Congress is a disgrace! All of Washington is not worth the rope it would take to hang them all.

    Yep and the one thing everybody missed here was the swearing-in of Muller to testify and what was that? They left out 'So help me G-d". SO next will be to get rid of the Chaplin and opening prays in Congress! :o Second time I think after today.

    serf

    Democrats PURPOSEFULLY omit ?so help me God? from the swearing-in oath during yesterday?s House Judiciary subcommittee hearing.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpfRJFKG77c
    0
  • shilowar
    I thought it was great, once again the Dems promised a big gotcha moment and fell flat on their faces. I think Mitch McConnell should start talking about bringing Mueller before the Senate committees to continue the questioning and watch the Dems flip out.
    0
  • mag00
    shilowar wrote:
    I thought it was great, once again the Dems promised a big gotcha moment and fell flat on their faces. I think Mitch McConnell should start talking about bringing Mueller before the Senate committees to continue the questioning and watch the Dems flip out.

    And throw him in jail for contempt if he don't answer.
    0
  • bambihunter
    serf wrote:
    Yep and the one thing everybody missed here was the swearing-in of Muller to testify and what was that? They left out 'So help me G-d". S

    Democrats PURPOSEFULLY omit ?so help me God? from the swearing-in oath during yesterday?s House Judiciary subcommittee hearing.

    Honestly, that doesn't bother me at all. First, there should be separation of church and state as intended (even more than there is now). Second, if they don't believe in God, then swearing it doesn't mean anything. It'd be the same as "so help me Peter Pan".
    0
  • Smitty500mag
    I used to think we needed to keep "so help me God" in the swearing in oath but the way things are going it might not be to far off in the future when the muslims will be the majority and I sure as hell don't want to hear "so help me Allah".
    0
  • mag00
    bambihunter wrote:
    serf wrote:
    Yep and the one thing everybody missed here was the swearing-in of Muller to testify and what was that? They left out 'So help me G-d". S

    Democrats PURPOSEFULLY omit ?so help me God? from the swearing-in oath during yesterday?s House Judiciary subcommittee hearing.

    Honestly, that doesn't bother me at all. First, there should be separation of church and state as intended (even more than there is now). Second, if they don't believe in God, then swearing it doesn't mean anything. It'd be the same as "so help me Peter Pan".

    Separation of church and state is a myth and that is not how the constitution reads or was intended to read.

    Simply put, there is to be no NATIONAL religion. The country was founded on GOD, not lack there of.

    When State and federal ban God from school, that is in fact a STATE/FED run moral institute, mandating a "religion" of Atheism, which is exactly what our founders didn't want to happen.
    0
  • bambihunter
    I think due to England having an official state religion (Church of England) they intended for the government to not pick, choose, promote, or endorse any religion. Wording like "in god we trust" was likely more a product of the individual creator or team. Adding 'so help me god' at the end of the oath was likely set in precedence rather than any ruling. In fact, I see much more laws against required religion. Such as: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Religious_Test_Clause

    I was a 3x / week church-goer as a kid and even graduated from a Christian school. But, we have parted ways. I am NOT an atheist nor one of those that thinks that historical cultural references needs stripped out. But, especially here recently (mostly regarding muslim) all the FB posts about America being founded as a Christian nation and such, I just have to point out that is not correct. Sure, some of the founding fathers absolutely were, but they saw what state mandated religion could do and purposely kept it out.

    Religion is a hot-button topic for some. I'll leave it for those polarized on each side to fight it out. I just don't really care that much. Certainly not enough to debate it.
    0
  • Sam06
    all the FB posts about America being founded as a Christian nation and such, I just have to point out that is not correct. Sure, some of the founding fathers absolutely were, but they saw what state mandated religion could do and purposely kept it out.

    +1

    Most of the FF were what is know as a creationist.

    Keep religion out of government the way the FF wanted it.

    islam is not really a religion just like buddhism is more of a philosophy or a way of life. Either way it has no business in a free society.
    0
  • dfletcher
    Did anyone notice disruptions from the audience whenever Mueller said anything that tended to speak against the President? Or whenever he said anything supportive of the Democrats' position? Did you see them yelling and waving signs, screaming for the cameras. Having to be hauled out kicking and flailing and cursing. As was done in the Kavanaugh hearings?

    Me neither.

    It's SOP for the Democrats, when they don't have their way.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity