Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Here we go again

Comments

11 comments

  • Mr. Perfect
    ruger41 wrote:
    I told you so this would happen. This guy is a damn moron. He is 100% no friend of the 2nd Amendment. Silencers get used rarely and only one time in a mass shooting and he?s ready to ban them. While he cannot outright tell the ATF to do it like with bumpstocks, if Congressional Democrats can get enough spineless Republicans on board THEY can or if they take the Senate they WILL. I was told our 8 year assault on the Second Amendment was over but this ignorant fool has proven what I knew all along, he?s nothing more than a NYC republican which is a Democrat. He just lost a ton of supporters. In the interview he also shows he knows nothing about the real reason for the 2nd Amendment, he says we own semi auto?s for entertainment.


    https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2019/06/luis-valdes/trump-were-goin-to-seriously-look-at-banning-suppressors/?utm_content=buffer09712&utm_medium=buffer&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=ttagfeed

    I expect the Fudds here will love this move.
    0
  • ruger41
    Oh I expect nothing less. Will be the ?Well Hillary would have or the current Dems running will so what choices do we have.? Umm maybe stop voting for anti Constitutional pieces of garbage for once.
    0
  • Sam06
    I saw this earlier while looking at the news and seeing Trumpys interview with Morgan.

    I expect coonman to be all over this also.


    These libtards just keep chipping away, like I said before I expect we are maybe 2 mass shootings away from some strict gun laws coming down the pipe.

    I think some of these politicians need to schooled on how hard it is to get a suppressor now to even buy a gun is harder than it was 30 years ago. The gun rights/2a organizations need to really step up and I wish the NRA would lead but I doubt they will. The NRA probably supports the outlawing of suppressor sales :cry:
    0
  • He Dog
    I find it sad we mostly end up voting for the least objectionable candidate, rather than having some one run we might actually want. Maybe those people have more self respect than to run for public office.
    0
  • mjrfd99
    ruger41 wrote:
    Oh I expect nothing less. Will be the ?Well Hillary would have or the current Dems running will so what choices do we have.? Umm maybe stop voting for anti Constitutional pieces of garbage for once.

    I agree 101%
    Have any?

    2uBnH01.jpg
    0
  • ruger41
    mjrfd99 wrote:
    ruger41 wrote:
    Oh I expect nothing less. Will be the ?Well Hillary would have or the current Dems running will so what choices do we have.? Umm maybe stop voting for anti Constitutional pieces of garbage for once.

    I agree 101%
    Have any?

    2uBnH01.jpg

    Sadly not at the moment. The closest to it would probably be Rand Paul. But the best choice might just be a dingdong Democrat President and a Republican controlled Congress and Nothing gets done. Gridlock the hell out of the place. Seems like the only time gun owners really do anything is when we have a Democrat in the White House. But the current occupant of the White House has shown his ass. I didn?t vote for him last time but I had considered giving him my vote in 2020 but that ended after the bumpstock ban and his support of red flag laws, take the guns then sort it out later bs. He definitely will not get my vote this time. He talks out of both sides of his mouth and he believes in the 2nd Amendment but thinks it?s about entertainment and hunting. I?m done compromising and with politicians compromising the 2nd Amendment.
    0
  • Brookwood
    Having Worthy candidate choices has been our biggest problem for quite some time!! All we get to vote for are the lesser of two evils.

    IN the end, all we get is EVIL
    0
  • Junkballer
    The Republican to worry about in my opinion is the "do nothing" Mitch McConnell, he's one sorry-assed Senate Majority Leader :evil:. Always said, "when we get the Senate Majority and when we get majority of the Congress we'll do this and we'll do that".....well, he's had both at the same time and didn't do a damn thing :evil:
    0
  • RugerNiner
    "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
    0
  • wpageabc
    The old addage...

    No matter which way you choose. You loose.

    No doubt Hillary could be doing a better job now. :ugeek:
    0
  • Marc1301
    He Dog wrote:
    I find it sad we mostly end up voting for the least objectionable candidate, rather than having some one run we might actually want. Maybe those people have more self respect than to run for public office.
    I think you are 100% correct.

    This guy in the comments section has it right, and describes a number of members here perfectly,......

    "What is easier to defend against: the repealing of the 2nd Amendment or a slow passage of infringements?

    I heard for like 9 years that a foreign born black Muslim was going to take all our guns. His AG and ATF buddies were going to strip us of everything. Everyone was saying to go out and get what you can while you can because Sandy Hook is going to be the nail in the coffin.

    Today I am hearing that a white anti American Satan worshiper is going save us from the big bad Commie multiculturalists who seek to unite Americans under European socialism. Yet there is more gun control being passed in the last 3 years than the 8 prior. The president is more worried about arming Muslims in another country than Americans. There is now an anti constitution AG who wants gun confiscation for law enforcement and an anti gun law enforcement officer becoming the ATF director. There are Republicans like Dan Crenshaw calling for precrime powers under Homeland Security for law enforcement that will combine with other Republican/Decmocrat red flag laws.

    Republicans are setting up a stronger police state and are passing gun confiscation powers for that police state before the Democrats take back control. It happened under Bush before Obama. Then Obama used it to spy on everyone and anyone.

    It?s like the Republicans and the Democrats are playing tennis with the American people. Then the Republican voters say at least the Republicans don?t hit us as hard as the Democrats, be happy about it and don?t change a thing. So under Republicans the hits are still coming and some of us are willing to absorb all of them because the Democrats know how to swing their racket well. That sounds like a bunch of pathetic scared losers willingly taking the smaller racket up the butt and asking for more.

    Please, sir! I want some more.

    The government you elect is the government you deserve."
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity