2A Sanctuary cities

remingtonoaks

May 12, 2019 19:29

I most definitely approve

https://www-breitbart-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/12/four-rhode-island-towns-declare-2nd-amendment-sanctuary/amp/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1#referrer=https://www.google.com&amp_tf=From %1$s&ampshare=https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/12/four-rhode-island-towns-declare-2nd-amendment-sanctuary/

0

• 

  wpageabc

  May 12, 2019 19:47

  Agreed, a armed society is a polite one.

  0
• 

  select-fire

  May 12, 2019 19:59

  No Sanctuary cities for anything.

  0
• 

  Ditch-Runner

  May 12, 2019 20:50

  I will say
  good for them however the federal boys take a dim view of any ignoring there "firearm" laws
  now illegal immigrant's by the ten of thousands drug user /seller's , race bating other that whites get a free pass
  gun owner's are public enemy #1 as we all know

  0
• 

  remingtonoaks

  May 12, 2019 21:31

  Ditch-Runner wrote:

  I will say
  good for them however the federal boys take a dim view of any ignoring there "firearm" laws
  now illegal immigrant's by the ten of thousands drug user /seller's , race bating other that whites get a free pass
  gun owner's are public enemy #1 as we all know

  
  I don't think they're Sanctuary cities 4 the federal government's, they're Sanctuary cities for the state and County governments that are confiscating Firearms without due process by becoming red flag States and counties

  0
• 

  remingtonoaks

  May 12, 2019 22:04

  select-fire wrote:

  No Sanctuary cities for anything.

  
  So you think the cities should go ahead and confiscate firearms from citizens for no good reason in red flag States and counties? That's what these cities are addressing, the unconstitutional confiscation of firearms.
  
  But if you're saying that there should be no reason for 2A Sanctuary cities, I agree with you. But guess what... there are liberals in this world, so we live in an imperfect world got need Sanctuary cities for the 2A

  0
• 

  mark christian

  May 12, 2019 23:04

  2A sanctuary cities= local jurisdictions who have taken a stand against their state legislators who are attempting to deprive their citizens of their constitutional rights...A+
  
  Many gun control measures, especially those involving accessories such as magazines, are virtually unenforceable without local police and sheriffs dedicating substantial resources. Will a department assign an officer to every shooting range in order to inspect each and every magazine that is in possession of a range customer? Would said officer have the ability to effectively judge when the particular magazine was produced and when the customer came into possession? If a receipt were demanded and the customer presented one, how would the officer know that the receipt was genuine (you can do anything on a home printer)? Magazines have no serial numbers, so even if the receipt was genuine, how would the officer know that the magazines listed on the receipt (say four Glock-17 magazines) are in fact the exact magazines in possession?
  
  Perhaps if more local PDs and sheriffs simply tell the folks in the Statehouse "Look, you can pass endless legislation, but we can't enforce those kinds of nonsensical laws," then maybe it will slow down the assault of the Second.

  0
• 

  remingtonoaks

  May 13, 2019 01:51

  mark christian wrote:

  2A sanctuary cities= local jurisdictions who have taken a stand against their state legislators who are attempting to deprive their citizens of their constitutional rights...A+
  
  Many gun control measures, especially those involving accessories such as magazines, are virtually unenforceable without local police and sheriffs dedicating substantial resources. Will a department assign an officer to every shooting range in order to inspect each and every magazine that is in possession of a range customer? Would said officer have the ability to effectively judge when the particular magazine was produced and when the customer came into possession? If a receipt were demanded and the customer presented one, how would the officer know that the receipt was genuine (you can do anything on a home printer)? Magazines have no serial numbers, so even if the receipt was genuine, how would the officer know that the magazines listed on the receipt (say four Glock-17 magazines) are in fact the exact magazines in possession?
  
  Perhaps if more local PDs and sheriffs simply tell the folks in the Statehouse "Look, you can pass endless legislation, but we can't enforce those kinds of nonsensical laws," then maybe it will slow down the assault of the Second.

  
  I hope you're right, but I doubt anything is going to slow down the assault on the Second Amendment. It's one of the Liberals biggest things that make them liberal, they figure disarm the country so that they can make us slaves...

  0
• 

  shilowar

  May 13, 2019 04:04

  I do enjoy seeing liberal ideas used against them.

  0
• 

  SpiceTac

  May 13, 2019 18:01

  I approve 100%
  Sign my town up!

  0
• 

  select-fire

  May 13, 2019 18:16

  remingtonoaks wrote:

  select-fire wrote:

  No Sanctuary cities for anything.

  
  So you think the cities should go ahead and confiscate firearms from citizens for no good reason in red flag States and counties? That's what these cities are addressing, the unconstitutional confiscation of firearms.
  
  But if you're saying that there should be no reason for 2A Sanctuary cities, I agree with you. But guess what... there are liberals in this world, so we live in an imperfect world got need Sanctuary cities for the 2A

  
  No reason. What is next for a sanctuary city? Only Pit Bulls.. Only Ford Drivers.. It started with Muslims and now has got carried away.

  0
• 

  Mr. Perfect

  May 13, 2019 18:31

  mark christian wrote:

  2A sanctuary cities= local jurisdictions who have taken a stand against their state legislators who are attempting to deprive their citizens of their constitutional rights...A+
  
  Many gun control measures, especially those involving accessories such as magazines, are virtually unenforceable without local police and sheriffs dedicating substantial resources. Will a department assign an officer to every shooting range in order to inspect each and every magazine that is in possession of a range customer? Would said officer have the ability to effectively judge when the particular magazine was produced and when the customer came into possession? If a receipt were demanded and the customer presented one, how would the officer know that the receipt was genuine (you can do anything on a home printer)? Magazines have no serial numbers, so even if the receipt was genuine, how would the officer know that the magazines listed on the receipt (say four Glock-17 magazines) are in fact the exact magazines in possession?
  
  Perhaps if more local PDs and sheriffs simply tell the folks in the Statehouse "Look, you can pass endless legislation, but we can't enforce those kinds of nonsensical laws," then maybe it will slow down the assault of the Second.

  
  A lot of them do tell the legislators that Mark, but it doesn't seem to slow the nonsense any. Here's to hopin' tho.

  0

Please sign in to leave a comment.