Dumming down the SAT
In order to be PC an adversity score is being factored into the SAT. I guess the new version will have spellings like SCREET for street Etc?
Goodbye America Hello garbage
https://www.foxnews.com/us/sat-to-use-adversity-score-for-students-applying-to-college
Goodbye America Hello garbage
https://www.foxnews.com/us/sat-to-use-adversity-score-for-students-applying-to-college
0
-
Dumbing down the SAT? Why am I always too late (40 years) to take advantage of this sort of thing? My SAT score wasn't exactly stellar, but enrolling community in college only required the ability to sign my name! 0 -
GilWilson1 wrote:In order to be PC an adversity score is being factored into the SAT. I guess the new version will have spellings like SCREET for street Etc?
Goodbye America Hello garbage
https://www.foxnews.com/us/sat-to-use-adversity-score-for-students-applying-to-college
Or like 'dumming' for dumbing?
0 -
SATs will be like Driver's Test in Chinese, Vietnamese, Mexican, Ebonix, Street, Jive 

.0 -
This is just another example of tilting the playing field. The SAT was supposed to be the ultimate playing field leveler, no matter who you were or what color you are a good score got you in a good school. You could be from the slum but good grades and good score got you in a good school where you earned a degree and got a good job and made good money; the American Dream.
Now they are tearing that down too.
F--king libtards their self hatred is infecting this country like ebola.0 -
There is simply no justifiable business case that this actually benefits those seeking an education. 0 -
Questions like:
A pound of weed will yield how many dime bags?
A. You mispelled "dime" it is "damn".
B. Fity cents
C. 10 dimes in a dollar
D. 20+ after you cut it with oregano
A first offense of armed robbery will get you
A. 1/2 year in the penitentary
B. 6 months in the penitentary
C. Nothing, if you don't appear
D. A suspender sentence
True or False
Nikes are faster than Converse when running from the popo.
The proper tool for popping ignitions is a no. 1 flat-tip screwdriver.
A Bong is a wind chime that makes a "bong" sound.
"Hands Up" is pig-latin for "Run!"
"Putyerhanswhereicanseeem" is pig-latin for "Please shoot me!"0 -
Sam06 wrote:This is just another example of tilting the playing field. The SAT was supposed to be the ultimate playing field leveler, no matter who you were or what color you are a good score got you in a good school. You could be from the slum but good grades and good score got you in a good school where you earned a degree and got a good job and made good money; the American Dream.
Now they are tearing that down too.
F--king libtards their self hatred is infecting this country like ebola.
It is not as dire as it may seem, IMO.
Currently individual schools make assessments based upon potential students being from disadvantaged backgrounds. Each school will employ different methodology in making these determinations.
As an example, there was an athlete in my class who was a minority with a disadvantaged background who was admitted to an Ivy League institution with an SAT score that was half of what mine was.
The school obviously included a wide range of criteria in his admittance, as I would assume thousands with significantly higher SAT scores were turned away.
The adversity score that is being assigned with SAT score is a separate score, and the university will see the raw date and the adversity rating.
IMO, this is a mechanism whereby schools are shielding themselves from reverse discrimination lawsuits by relying upon a third party's analysis when tabulating their diversity/adversity quotas.
The raw SAT score is still there. The potential danger will be if the SJW brigades seek to punish schools for ignoring the adversity score; something that is highly likely.0 -
How does it accomplish anything? So a test taker gets points added to their score. Does that mean they're smart enough to pass a test? Supposing they ride this sort of thing all the way through, are businesses going to pad salary for them when they still can't even spell their name as well? In my experience delayed consequences are worse because by the time they come along the stakes are higher. 0 -
I'd don't suppose this will save the eventual destruction of womens / girls sports by transgender males identifying as females being allowed to compete,, will it?
Transgender male wins female competition.
0 -
Leftist DEMOCRAT ideology 101:
Fairness: A tactic used to lower standards, level the paying field, promote diversity, and most important: get votes. Been going on since the "Great Society".
The same dogma has spawned a lavish entitlement environment which does nothing more than stimulate apathy, promotes listlessness, and non productivity in humans.0 -
All I got out of the article was that a lot more people will be enrolling in college, taking out student loans just to party with and never paying them back.
Guess it's just another way of hiding Distributing the wealth0 -
Don McManus wrote:Sam06 wrote:This is just another example of tilting the playing field. The SAT was supposed to be the ultimate playing field leveler, no matter who you were or what color you are a good score got you in a good school. You could be from the slum but good grades and good score got you in a good school where you earned a degree and got a good job and made good money; the American Dream.
Now they are tearing that down too.
F--king libtards their self hatred is infecting this country like ebola.
It is not as dire as it may seem, IMO.
Currently individual schools make assessments based upon potential students being from disadvantaged backgrounds. Each school will employ different methodology in making these determinations.
As an example, there was an athlete in my class who was a minority with a disadvantaged background who was admitted to an Ivy League institution with an SAT score that was half of what mine was.
The school obviously included a wide range of criteria in his admittance, as I would assume thousands with significantly higher SAT scores were turned away.
The adversity score that is being assigned with SAT score is a separate score, and the university will see the raw date and the adversity rating.
IMO, this is a mechanism whereby schools are shielding themselves from reverse discrimination lawsuits by relying upon a third party's analysis when tabulating their diversity/adversity quotas.
The raw SAT score is still there. The potential danger will be if the SJW brigades seek to punish schools for ignoring the adversity score; something that is highly likely.
Yeah they included a higher range of criteria in admitting him. They included the fact that he could play sports which brings in money to help pay for his schooling... and everybody else's schooling.
What are these other yahoos going to do to help pay for their schooling? Or anybody else's for that matter? You know they're not going to help lower tuition. You know they're going to take out a bunch of student loans to pay for it, and then they're just going to go out and party on it and never pay it back.
I guess they can bring their expertise into the school on how to roll a joint and talk Jive. Of course it doesn't help pay for their schooling,
Yes it is as dire as it looks!!!
It's just another way to distribute wealth without the people that can't for themselves knowing it
Dire, extremely dire.
But keep yourself Hoodwinked to that fact, that way you won't have to face the reality of it.0 -
2 and 2 before 0 -
remingtonoaks wrote:Don McManus wrote:Sam06 wrote:This is just another example of tilting the playing field. The SAT was supposed to be the ultimate playing field leveler, no matter who you were or what color you are a good score got you in a good school. You could be from the slum but good grades and good score got you in a good school where you earned a degree and got a good job and made good money; the American Dream.
Now they are tearing that down too.
F--king libtards their self hatred is infecting this country like ebola.
It is not as dire as it may seem, IMO.
Currently individual schools make assessments based upon potential students being from disadvantaged backgrounds. Each school will employ different methodology in making these determinations.
As an example, there was an athlete in my class who was a minority with a disadvantaged background who was admitted to an Ivy League institution with an SAT score that was half of what mine was.
The school obviously included a wide range of criteria in his admittance, as I would assume thousands with significantly higher SAT scores were turned away.
The adversity score that is being assigned with SAT score is a separate score, and the university will see the raw date and the adversity rating.
IMO, this is a mechanism whereby schools are shielding themselves from reverse discrimination lawsuits by relying upon a third party's analysis when tabulating their diversity/adversity quotas.
The raw SAT score is still there. The potential danger will be if the SJW brigades seek to punish schools for ignoring the adversity score; something that is highly likely.
Yeah they included a higher range of criteria in admitting him. They included the fact that he could play sports which brings in money to help pay for his schooling... and everybody else's schooling.
What are these other yahoos going to do to help pay for their schooling? Or anybody else's for that matter? You know they're not going to help lower tuition. You know they're going to take out a bunch of student loans to pay for it, and then they're just going to go out and party on it and never pay it back.
I guess they can bring their expertise into the school on how to roll a joint and talk Jive. Of course it doesn't help pay for their schooling,
Yes it is as dire as it looks!!!
It's just another way to distribute wealth without the people that can't for themselves knowing it
Dire, extremely dire.
But keep yourself Hoodwinked to that fact, that way you won't have to face the reality of it.
Considering he was a wrestler at an Ivy League school, the money argument goes out the window.
There are no scholarships, and wrestling is typically a money loser.
Don't understand the hoodwinked comment. The point was that this type of thing has been going on for years, and would have continued whether it was institutionalized by an addendum to the SAT score or not.
Considering all of the problems we are seeing in our colleges and universities, this one is almost trivial.0 -
Your IQ, inteligence quocient. Has little to do with where you came from...
What does count in SAT's has more to do with. Not having a proxy take your SAT exam for you who is a ringer who specializes in test fakeing. The advantage of taking several SAT prep courses over some slob who takes the test cold, since he does not know better.
The slep that was not told to select "C" when in doubt of correct answers. Or to be sure to answer all befor time runs out for best scores.
Good test taking has a strategy for success. Like other things.0 -
Don McManus wrote:remingtonoaks wrote:Don McManus wrote:
It is not as dire as it may seem, IMO.
Currently individual schools make assessments based upon potential students being from disadvantaged backgrounds. Each school will employ different methodology in making these determinations.
As an example, there was an athlete in my class who was a minority with a disadvantaged background who was admitted to an Ivy League institution with an SAT score that was half of what mine was.
The school obviously included a wide range of criteria in his admittance, as I would assume thousands with significantly higher SAT scores were turned away.
The adversity score that is being assigned with SAT score is a separate score, and the university will see the raw date and the adversity rating.
IMO, this is a mechanism whereby schools are shielding themselves from reverse discrimination lawsuits by relying upon a third party's analysis when tabulating their diversity/adversity quotas.
The raw SAT score is still there. The potential danger will be if the SJW brigades seek to punish schools for ignoring the adversity score; something that is highly likely.
Yeah they included a higher range of criteria in admitting him. They included the fact that he could play sports which brings in money to help pay for his schooling... and everybody else's schooling.
What are these other yahoos going to do to help pay for their schooling? Or anybody else's for that matter? You know they're not going to help lower tuition. You know they're going to take out a bunch of student loans to pay for it, and then they're just going to go out and party on it and never pay it back.
I guess they can bring their expertise into the school on how to roll a joint and talk Jive. Of course it doesn't help pay for their schooling,
Yes it is as dire as it looks!!!
It's just another way to distribute wealth without the people that can't for themselves knowing it
Dire, extremely dire.
But keep yourself Hoodwinked to that fact, that way you won't have to face the reality of it.
Considering he was a wrestler at an Ivy League school, the money argument goes out the window.
There are no scholarships, and wrestling is typically a money loser.
Don't understand the hoodwinked comment. The point was that this type of thing has been going on for years, and would have continued whether it was institutionalized by an addendum to the SAT score or not.
Considering all of the problems we are seeing in our colleges and universities, this one is almost trivial.
I'm not weighing in on the crux of the matter. Only to clarify the "there are no scholarships" at Ivy League schools comment, which is true but incomplete. Because there is financial aid. Mom and Dad telling one and all their kid is on a "scholarship to Brown" isn't nearly so true or prideful as "we needed a little help". But financial help there is, so that a person attending must not be somewhat cash trapped isn't determinative.
I'm supposing it's true and complete that wrestling is a net loser. My best friend used to wrestle for Harvard (he wasn't bright enough to attend Amherst) and when visiting I practiced shooting 22 rifle on their underground indoor shooting range. Was a long time ago ?..0 -
at every school doing top level athletics, Football and men's basketball receipts pays the scholarship bills, and also operation costs of all the other sports. these non-revenue generating like swimming, lacrosse, track and field, cross country, womens softball, golf, volleyball all owe their very existence to those 2 sports mentioned. of course there are schools that have excellent women's basketball programs that contribute greatly to the overall athletic funds, but they are a minority of Division 1 schools. Tennessee, and UConn namely. 0 -
This is just like ?affirmative action!? You don?t get what you earn. You get what you get based on non factual details.
Oh well...0 -
dfletcher wrote:Don McManus wrote:remingtonoaks wrote:
Yeah they included a higher range of criteria in admitting him. They included the fact that he could play sports which brings in money to help pay for his schooling... and everybody else's schooling.
What are these other yahoos going to do to help pay for their schooling? Or anybody else's for that matter? You know they're not going to help lower tuition. You know they're going to take out a bunch of student loans to pay for it, and then they're just going to go out and party on it and never pay it back.
I guess they can bring their expertise into the school on how to roll a joint and talk Jive. Of course it doesn't help pay for their schooling,
Yes it is as dire as it looks!!!
It's just another way to distribute wealth without the people that can't for themselves knowing it
Dire, extremely dire.
But keep yourself Hoodwinked to that fact, that way you won't have to face the reality of it.
Considering he was a wrestler at an Ivy League school, the money argument goes out the window.
There are no scholarships, and wrestling is typically a money loser.
Don't understand the hoodwinked comment. The point was that this type of thing has been going on for years, and would have continued whether it was institutionalized by an addendum to the SAT score or not.
Considering all of the problems we are seeing in our colleges and universities, this one is almost trivial.
I'm not weighing in on the crux of the matter. Only to clarify the "there are no scholarships" at Ivy League schools comment, which is true but incomplete. Because there is financial aid. Mom and Dad telling one and all their kid is on a "scholarship to Brown" isn't nearly so true or prideful as "we needed a little help". But financial help there is, so that a person attending must not be somewhat cash trapped isn't determinative.
I'm supposing it's true and complete that wrestling is a net loser. My best friend used to wrestle for Harvard (he wasn't bright enough to attend Amherst) and when visiting I practiced shooting 22 rifle on their underground indoor shooting range. Was a long time ago ?..
A good point. I should have been more precise and stated 'athletic scholarships'.
Athletes had access to free food at the 'training table', jobs on campus not avialable to other students, housing allowances, IIRC, and probably other perks. They also had access to the grants and scholarships that were available to other students and no doubt some alumni sponsored scholarships as well. This was 40 years ago. Don't have a clue how it works today.0 -
schools are shielding themselves from reverse discrimination lawsuits
First kill all the lawyers.0 -
Race hustling is a way of life for the socialists and their lackey's. Watching Fox News the other night while they were discussing this subject when one of their regular minority race hustlers summarized his family's move from Georgia to California and whined, almost coming to tears about his parents only having a high school education and an eighth grade education, without saying were it not for handouts he would not have become an attorney. Well whoop de do! Why not try being the typical white family, especially Southern that did not have either parent with a high school education, and kids who have never had head of the line handouts to get the chance to become an attorney or any other type professional, for the last half century at that! They just don't have a damn clue one... 0 -
All about filling the colleges and universities with students..Money.. Not enough today can make the grade without changing the rules. 0 -
Exactly,....real life is a lot tougher than school.Mr. Perfect wrote:How does it accomplish anything? So a test taker gets points added to their score. Does that mean they're smart enough to pass a test? Supposing they ride this sort of thing all the way through, are businesses going to pad salary for them when they still can't even spell their name as well? In my experience delayed consequences are worse because by the time they come along the stakes are higher.0 -
I heard a conversation on the radio a few days ago about changes to the SAT, and one of the individuals claimed that the same person who designed and pushed for 'Common Core' in schools is responsible for this. Anyone know if this is correct? 0 -
Mohammed Rastus Gonzales can get ahead in America now without really trying..... 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
25 comments