fix em ...REALLY ??
a new $2 TRILLION $$ infrastructure bill proposed to remodel AMERICA... in my book ..ONLY... if govt cancels this amount of freebies money giveaway to the world ......we have given so much to so many for so long they now think of it as an annual ENTITLEMENT........like the ambulance chasing lawyer ads on tv...GET WHAT YOU (think you) DESERVE....way past time wasting money around the world on govts who line up at the trough
0
-
You bet.
That $ 50 billion in foreign aid is going to go a long way in paying down this $2 trillion crap show.0 -
Don McManus wrote:You bet.
That $ 50 billion in foreign aid is going to go a long way in paying down this $2 trillion crap show.
Spoken like a true,,, well I'm not going to say the words.... Who thinks 50 billion dollars is a drop in the bucket
Hey I got an idea, if you think 50 billion dollars is just a drop in the bucket like you portray it to be, why don't you take care of that bill for us
You know the old saying, put up or shut up....
Well...........
We're waiting
NO????
Then maybe you ought to read what was actually written in the OP, and not what you THINK he wrote.... he said ".ONLY... if govt cancels this amount of freebies money giveaway to the world ..."
Maybe you ought to try taking some reading comprehension classes. You would come across as being more intelligent and quit embarrassing yourself0 -
remingtonoaks wrote:Don McManus wrote:You bet.
That $ 50 billion in foreign aid is going to go a long way in paying down this $2 trillion crap show.
Spoken like a true,,, well I'm not going to say the words.... Who thinks 50 billion dollars is a drop in the bucket
Hey I got an idea, if you think 50 billion dollars is just a drop in the bucket like you portray it to be, why don't you take care of that bill for us
You know the old saying, put up or shut up....
Well...........
We're waiting
NO????
Then maybe you ought to read what was actually written in the OP, and not what you THINK he wrote.... he said ".ONLY... if govt cancels this amount of freebies money giveaway to the world ..."
Maybe you ought to try taking some reading comprehension classes. You would come across as being more intelligent and quit embarrassing yourself
Remingtonoaks. You apparently can't get along with the other kids. I don't know what your beef is, but you seem to have an axe to grind with everyone here. Every time I see an alert show up on my panel, I take it for granted that you are somehow involved. You've already received three warnings and you are going to get a fourth, but you seem unimpressed. Something bad happens at five warnings, but unless you clean up your act you may not last that long.0 -
Know the plan??? Guess what, the DIMS want to raise taxes so any increases you got/get,, go back to the Treasury so congress can intelligently spend the money. OK, maybe not intelligently. 
0 -
50 billion vs. 2 trillion... is a literal drop in the bucket. You're left with 1.95 trillion.remingtonoaks wrote:Don McManus wrote:You bet.
That $ 50 billion in foreign aid is going to go a long way in paying down this $2 trillion crap show.
Spoken like a true,,, well I'm not going to say the words.... Who thinks 50 billion dollars is a drop in the bucket
Hey I got an idea, if you think 50 billion dollars is just a drop in the bucket like you portray it to be, why don't you take care of that bill for us
You know the old saying, put up or shut up....
Well...........
We're waiting
NO????
Then maybe you ought to read what was actually written in the OP, and not what you THINK he wrote.... he said ".ONLY... if govt cancels this amount of freebies money giveaway to the world ..."
Maybe you ought to try taking some reading comprehension classes. You would come across as being more intelligent and quit embarrassing yourself0 -
Mr. Perfect wrote:
50 billion vs. 2 trillion... is a literal drop in the bucket. You're left with 1.95 trillion.remingtonoaks wrote:Don McManus wrote:You bet.
That $ 50 billion in foreign aid is going to go a long way in paying down this $2 trillion crap show.
Spoken like a true,,, well I'm not going to say the words.... Who thinks 50 billion dollars is a drop in the bucket
Hey I got an idea, if you think 50 billion dollars is just a drop in the bucket like you portray it to be, why don't you take care of that bill for us
You know the old saying, put up or shut up....
Well...........
We're waiting
NO????
Then maybe you ought to read what was actually written in the OP, and not what you THINK he wrote.... he said ".ONLY... if govt cancels this amount of freebies money giveaway to the world ..."
Maybe you ought to try taking some reading comprehension classes. You would come across as being more intelligent and quit embarrassing yourself
Again, read the original OP... . he said ".ONLY... if govt cancels this amount of freebies money giveaway to the world..." meaning ONLY IF the government out cut out 2 trillion dollars foreign aid
And if you think 50 billion dollars is a drop in the bucket, I wish I had your bank account. Nobody's arguing the fact that in comparison.... I'm just saying 50 billion dollars is not a drop in the bucket0 -
Yes, well you're narrowing in on the deficiency of the OP addressed by Don: namely that there isn't 2 trillion in foreign aid to cut. The amount is significantly closer to 50 billion, which is a literal drop in the bucket when 2 trillion is being discussed. (numbers are from 2017 and I doubt it has gone up 1000 fold).remingtonoaks wrote:Mr. Perfect wrote:
50 billion vs. 2 trillion... is a literal drop in the bucket. You're left with 1.95 trillion.remingtonoaks wrote:
Spoken like a true,,, well I'm not going to say the words.... Who thinks 50 billion dollars is a drop in the bucket
Hey I got an idea, if you think 50 billion dollars is just a drop in the bucket like you portray it to be, why don't you take care of that bill for us
You know the old saying, put up or shut up....
Well...........
We're waiting
NO????
Then maybe you ought to read what was actually written in the OP, and not what you THINK he wrote.... he said ".ONLY... if govt cancels this amount of freebies money giveaway to the world ..."
Maybe you ought to try taking some reading comprehension classes. You would come across as being more intelligent and quit embarrassing yourself
Again, read the original OP... . he said ".ONLY... if govt cancels this amount of freebies money giveaway to the world..." meaning ONLY IF the government out cut out 2 trillion dollars foreign aid
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_foreign_aid0 -
Mr. Perfect wrote:
Yes, well you're narrowing in on the deficiency of the OP addressed by Don: namely that there isn't 2 trillion in foreign aid to cut. The amount is significantly closer to 50 billion, which is a literal drop in the bucket when 2 trillion is being discussed. (numbers are from 2017 and I doubt it has gone up 1000 fold).remingtonoaks wrote:Mr. Perfect wrote:
50 billion vs. 2 trillion... is a literal drop in the bucket. You're left with 1.95 trillion.
Again, read the original OP... . he said ".ONLY... if govt cancels this amount of freebies money giveaway to the world..." meaning ONLY IF the government out cut out 2 trillion dollars foreign aid
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_foreign_aid
Sorry to say but the world does not not work author of in comparisons, it works in reality. And in reality 50 billion dollars is a not a drop in a bucket0 -
I work with numbers. 2 Trillion minus 50 billion is 1.950 Trillion. Literal and factual drop in the bucket. It's nigh on zero impact.remingtonoaks wrote:Mr. Perfect wrote:
Yes, well you're narrowing in on the deficiency of the OP addressed by Don: namely that there isn't 2 trillion in foreign aid to cut. The amount is significantly closer to 50 billion, which is a literal drop in the bucket when 2 trillion is being discussed. (numbers are from 2017 and I doubt it has gone up 1000 fold).remingtonoaks wrote:
Again, read the original OP... . he said ".ONLY... if govt cancels this amount of freebies money giveaway to the world..." meaning ONLY IF the government out cut out 2 trillion dollars foreign aid
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_foreign_aid
Sorry to say but the world does not not work author of in comparisons, it works in reality. And in reality 50 billion dollars is a not a drop in a bucket0 -
Mr. Perfect wrote:
I work with numbers. 2 Trillion minus 50 billion is 1.950 Trillion. Literal and factual drop in the bucket. It's nigh on zero impact.remingtonoaks wrote:Mr. Perfect wrote:
Yes, well you're narrowing in on the deficiency of the OP addressed by Don: namely that there isn't 2 trillion in foreign aid to cut. The amount is significantly closer to 50 billion, which is a literal drop in the bucket when 2 trillion is being discussed. (numbers are from 2017 and I doubt it has gone up 1000 fold).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_foreign_aid
Sorry to say but the world does not not work author of in comparisons, it works in reality. And in reality 50 billion dollars is a not a drop in a bucket
I work the numbers too... And 50 billion dollars it's not a drop in the bucket no matter how you look at it.
And if it is a drop in the bucket no matter how you look at it to you oh, why don't you do it 50 billion dollar giveaway here?0 -
If I had 2 Trillion dollars to start from, I wouldn't even blink giving away 50 billion.remingtonoaks wrote:Mr. Perfect wrote:
I work with numbers. 2 Trillion minus 50 billion is 1.950 Trillion. Literal and factual drop in the bucket. It's nigh on zero impact.remingtonoaks wrote:
Sorry to say but the world does not not work author of in comparisons, it works in reality. And in reality 50 billion dollars is a not a drop in a bucket
I work the numbers too... And 50 billion dollars it's not a drop in the bucket no matter how you look at it.
And if it is a drop in the bucket no matter how you look at it to you oh, why don't you do it 50 billion dollar giveaway here?0 -
Well my government apparently has two trillion dollars to give away and it pisses me off. And apparently they have another 50 billion dollars to give away in 4 and 8 which also pisses me offMr. Perfect wrote:
If I had 2 Trillion dollars to start from, I wouldn't even blink giving away 50 billion.remingtonoaks wrote:Mr. Perfect wrote:
I work with numbers. 2 Trillion minus 50 billion is 1.950 Trillion. Literal and factual drop in the bucket. It's nigh on zero impact.
I work the numbers too... And 50 billion dollars it's not a drop in the bucket no matter how you look at it.
And if it is a drop in the bucket no matter how you look at it to you oh, why don't you do it 50 billion dollar giveaway here?
But it takes all types, and it's good to see that there are some people in the United States is happy that there are people that are glad that they're giving away 4 that kind of money0 -
Who are those people?remingtonoaks wrote:
Well my government apparently has two trillion dollars to give away and it pisses me off. And apparently they have another 50 billion dollars to give away in 4 and 8 which also pisses me offMr. Perfect wrote:
If I had 2 Trillion dollars to start from, I wouldn't even blink giving away 50 billion.remingtonoaks wrote:
I work the numbers too... And 50 billion dollars it's not a drop in the bucket no matter how you look at it.
And if it is a drop in the bucket no matter how you look at it to you oh, why don't you do it 50 billion dollar giveaway here?
But it takes all types, and it's good to see that there are some people in the United States is happy that there are people that are glad that they're giving away 4 that kind of money0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
13 comments