Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Supreme Court to Hear Census Citizenship Question Case on Tuesday

Comments

14 comments

  • mark christian
    The Court will rule in favor of the Trump Administration. Individual census records are sealed for 72 years. Federal law restricts access to decennial census records to all but the individual named on the record or their legal heir, so there is nothing to gain or lose by answering the question.
    0
  • He Dog
    so there is nothing to gain or lose by answering the question.


    Then what is the point of asking the question?
    0
  • yoshmyster
    No point in California where illegals can vote. Illegal Citizens. I need to copy right that and make tee-shirts :D.
    0
  • Henry0Reilly
    The Current Population Survey that is conducted monthly with a representative sample of the population asks country of birth and those who say anywhere but the US are then asked if they are citizens and how long they've been in the US.

    https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps.html
    0
  • grdad45
    If the "citizenship question" is not included on the form, I will refuse to answer ANY questions.
    Several years ago I was sent a multi-page questionnaire asking a lot of questions that were none of anyone's business but my own. I threw it away. Then got another one telling me I had to complete it or face some kind of penalty/fine. I wrote KMA with a red marker and sent it back. I never heard from them again. If I get another one, I will write "No Habla Ingles" on it and return it.
    0
  • droptop
    The Court will rule in favor of the Trump Administration. Individual census records are sealed for 72 years. Federal law restricts access to decennial census records to all but the individual named on the record or their legal heir, so there is nothing to gain or lose by answering the question.
    Thought all the questions were tabulated, if not, how is the data from the form compiled?

    Reasonable to believe there is NO MASTER DATA BASE linking individuals answers with his name.

    We'd gain at a minimum how many answered they WERE NOT A CITIZEN and used for House apportionment.
    0
  • mark christian
    Because the individual responses are sealed for 72 years the person responding has nothing to gain or lose by answering the question. If you are 18 years old when you respond to the census, none of your personal data will be publically released until you turn 90. Most people are dead by then, so any privacy issue they might have will hardly be of concern. This the point of sealing the personal data for seven decades: you can answer any and all questions truthfully because your responses will not be made public within your lifetime.
    0
  • Smitty500mag
    And the government doesn't keep a record of who guns are sold to either. :roll:
    0
  • KenK/84Bravo
    Unless the "Census Taker," requires Identification of some form or another, how would they determine whether the "Are You a Citizen," or not, is answered Truthfully?



    Why Yes,............................... Yes I am here Legally.




    Laughing, while closing the door.
    0
  • waltermoe
    I think the electoral votes are figured on population. If you were and illegal alien and were asked if you were a citizen on the census form, you would be less likely to fill it out, but if your not asked chances are good they will fill it out. Because they were told that it will benefit them in the long run. This is one way of voting and not knowing that you even voted. Those States that keep their population high, will keep their vote count high in the electoral college.
    0
  • Ditch-Runner
    I hope kaliforina looses so many delegates and representatives it makes there head spin
    0
  • mag00
    I've never done a census. Is that like the tv rating polls? I got one of them along time ago.

    But yeah, it will clear the Supremes, it is nothing new and was removed in 2010, and brought back for this one. And yes, it is fair to know if you are a citizen or not.

    If you want to see the moron AOC go after an old fart who should have stepped down long ago, it's actually pretty comical on both sides, and they are making the laws, policies and decisions for our nation.

    [media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7vqi7C2Al0[/media]
    0
  • WearyTraveler
    He Dog wrote:
    so there is nothing to gain or lose by answering the question.


    Then what is the point of asking the question?

    I'd hope that eventually, someday, that they'd use the results to change government funding to reflect allocating monies by the number of US citizens. States that allow / harbor illegals would then get fewer dollars and hopefully be less sanctuary friendly.

    It won't happen - but one can hope.
    0
  • He Dog
    Gotta admire a cockeyed optimist Traveler. :D;)
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity