Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Is there a red flag law in your state?

Comments

17 comments

  • select-fire
    All the nonsense about SC having assault weapons banned was just nonsense. Non of it got anywhere..
    0
  • chiefr
    Red flag laws mean on thing: an unconstitutional assault on your rights by DEMOCRATs
    0
  • jimdeere
    ?Some things you won?t be able to do
    If you are served with a red flag order, you will not be able to purchase firearms. Not only would lying on a 4473 expose you to federal and probably state charges, but the NICS check would probably block the sale even if you did lie misrepresent your status.?

    Questions:
    On which of the questions on the 4473 form would you be lying, if you immediately went and purchased another firearm?
    Will the authorities be asking you if this all the firearms you have in your possession?
    Are you committing a crime if you answer falsely?
    0
  • mjrfd99
    Quick&Dead, Good advice. Spot on.

    I lying AH can ruin everything.
    We can cry "unconstitutional" till blue in the face.
    We can blame demonrats.
    Some POS rats you out? Your screwed.

    Bottom line - be prepared.
    0
  • savage170
    Here in Florida we can't blame the democrats it was given to us by the Republicans and Marco wants it to go nation wide
    0
  • Don McManus
    'Do not piss off the wife' laws are spreading and are being supported by politicians of both stripes at the local and national level.

    It is a knee-jerk reaction based upon the address mental health mantra supported by the mainstream Republicans and the NRA following all nationally publicized shootings, mass or otherwise.

    The advise given in the OP is akin to the 'lay back and enjoy it' advise proffered years ago by a political candidate in Texas(?) some years ago.

    Everyone will react differently. Storing items off-site is a good idea obviously, but one must be sure that the items stored off-site have no paper trail. As firearm purchase laws are strengthened across the country, there are fewer and fewer firearms left that have no paper trail.

    Hard to predict how one will react at 4:00 in the am when a group of armed thugs breaks down your door. Some will react instinctively to protect hearth and home. In these cases, some of the armed thugs will be shot.

    In a just world, Due Process includes the individual subject to that process. In the case of these Red Flag Laws, that critical part of the Process is ignored, thus it is virtually impossible to craft these laws within 4th Amendment boundaries.

    In my opinion, of course.
    0
  • jeffb1911
    I think we need to suggest that RED FLAG laws also be used to take the PRIVELEDGE of DRIVING from women for the same reason! How many stories of women spurned running over their ex? Come to think of it, these "pissed off the wife" laws would already take away driving privileges if it was truly about preventing assault. The OP is correct in how to respond to such orders though. Stay calm, and get your ducks in a row for a very effective fight in court where you can actually present evidence instead of having lies told about you without your knowledge.

    Also, keep a written record of what you have secured somewhere else so it could not disappear when things are seized. Still, try to get a written receipt for all that is taken with serial numbers and condition. Then compare the two if this ever happens to you. And if they have become seriously deteriorated in condition due to improper handling or very poor storage, that might help you recover damages.
    0
  • patt7638
    Indiana does not have a red flag law.
    0
  • hillbille
    jimdeere wrote:
    ?Some things you won?t be able to do
    If you are served with a red flag order, you will not be able to purchase firearms. Not only would lying on a 4473 expose you to federal and probably state charges, but the NICS check would probably block the sale even if you did lie misrepresent your status.?

    Questions:
    On which of the questions on the 4473 form would you be lying, if you immediately went and purchased another firearm?
    Will the authorities be asking you if this all the firearms you have in your possession?
    Are you committing a crime if you answer falsely?
    I would guess technically the one about being legally able to own a firearm, once served you loose that right till you go to court to prove you are able to own them.
    0
  • slumlord44
    I unfortunately live in Illinois and it's a potential nightmare. Piss off most anyone and they can come and get your guns. Then the real problems start in trying to get them back. My wife, kids, inlaws, tennants, friends or aquaintences could make this happen. My concern as a collector is that I have large numbers of collectable guns worth in the mid 6 figure range. Condition is everything in their value. A couple of county sheriff deputys are not going to have the knowledge or equipment to haul them all out without doing damage. No idea how many vehicles it would take to haul them all away. Where are they going to be able to secure that volume of guns? I could easily have 6 figures in damages if and when I ever get them back. Will I be paid market value if for some reason I am not able to get them back? There is definately a constitutional problem in taking property without just compensation. The bump stock issue has already set the presicedent with no provision for payment of confiscated property. The sad part is that they can take all my guns and if I am committed to killing someone I will not be stopped, A knife from the kitchen or a hammer from the garage will do the job.
    0
  • nmyers
    Maryland is 1 of eight states that has enacted a red flag law.

    It used to be, to get your guns taken away the complainant had to appear before the judge & swear that you were a danger to her; theoretically, lying to the judge could get the complainant a perjury charge, but that rarely happened.

    Beginning this year, the complainant files an "extreme risk restraining order", which is reviewed by a court commissioner (who is not a judge, & may not even by a lawyer.) And, instead of knocking on the door at dinner time, the cops may just break down your door at 3:00 am. Foggy & confused, one unlucky fellow made a bad decision last year & got himself shot.

    Most folks find that they have to hire a lawyer to get their guns returned.

    Neal
    0
  • us55840
    slumlord44 wrote:
    I unfortunately live in Illinois and it's a potential nightmare. Piss off most anyone and they can come and get your guns. Then the real problems start in trying to get them back. My wife, kids, inlaws, tennants, friends or aquaintences could make this happen. My concern as a collector is that I have large numbers of collectable guns worth in the mid 6 figure range. Condition is everything in their value. A couple of county sheriff deputys are not going to have the knowledge or equipment to haul them all out without doing damage. No idea how many vehicles it would take to haul them all away. Where are they going to be able to secure that volume of guns? I could easily have 6 figures in damages if and when I ever get them back. Will I be paid market value if for some reason I am not able to get them back? There is definately a constitutional problem in taking property without just compensation. The bump stock issue has already set the presicedent with no provision for payment of confiscated property. The sad part is that they can take all my guns and if I am committed to killing someone I will not be stopped, A knife from the kitchen or a hammer from the garage will do the job.

    Therein is the question: Would placing all your firearms in a TRUST save them from confiscation?
    This, of course, is a legal question.

    :?:
    0
  • wpageabc
    Shame, wonder what the writers of the constitution would think of red flag laws...

    Sounds like a flagrant violation of the 2nd amendment.
    0
  • us55840
    wpageabc wrote:
    Shame, wonder what the writers of the constitution would think of red flag laws...

    Sounds like a flagrant violation of the 2nd amendment.


    And more specifically, the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.


    Amendment XIV
    Section 1.
    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
    0
  • serf
    chiefr wrote:
    Red flag laws mean on thing: an unconstitutional assault on your rights by DEMOCRATs

    President Trump is for it also but since it will be a state right issue he will not have to worry about alienated his base until after 2020 election. With due process of law only means that the majority of so-called violators will not be able to purchase(buy) a lawyer to seek justice and either will be given a court-appointed attorney or go into massive debt and still lose in a kangaroo court.

    serf

    Prejudicial bias of the decision-maker or from political decree are among the most publicized causes of kangaroo courts.] Such proceedings are often held to give the appearance of a fair and just trial, even though the verdict was already decided before the trial actually began.

    Example the supreme court imprisoning Japanese citizens in WWII.
    0
  • lt496
    Ah yes...the 'Donald Trump/NRA adopted and advocated for Red Flag anti-Constitution acts'. Unconstitutional gun seizure first, due process later.

    A prime exemplar of desired and advocated actions -vs- rhetoric to fool voters and Fuddites.

    Context can be one's friend. Truth always is.
    0
  • wpageabc
    Some lawyer should make a few bucks on these...
    Quick&Dead wrote:
    wpageabc wrote:
    Shame, wonder what the writers of the constitution would think of red flag laws...

    Sounds like a flagrant violation of the 2nd amendment.


    And more specifically, the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.


    Amendment XIV
    Section 1.
    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity