Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Sew Discord

Comments

10 comments

  • mogley98
    I read enough of the redacted report to know that Congress is in collusion to waste American taxpayers money and time while doing nothing to advance the well being of the country

    Time for America to turn out the turncoats on both sides of the aisle
    0
  • discusdad
    if you have noticed, the narrative of the DEMs has morphed from collusion, now the buzzword is "obstruction of justice". the mueller investigation has stated the "obstruction" notion was not dealt with with the same zest as what the collusion part was. the D's are pushing this narrative more since the collusion dead horse can't be beated anymore.
    0
  • discusdad
    this was contained in a Fox News report on the Mueller report..you decide..

    This included President Trump allegedly telling his White House counsel in June 2017 to inform the acting attorney general that Mueller had conflicts of interest and "must be removed." The report said Trump also fumed over the original appointment -- lamenting it would mean the "end of his presidency" -- first telling then-DOJ leader Jeff Sessions he should resign, and later trying to get Session to take back control of the probe.

    Mueller ultimately did not reach a conclusion on whether the president's conduct amounted to obstruction, stating: "[W]hile this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

    But even though Barr's DOJ determined they did not have evidence to pursue such a case, the details in the report only fueled Democrats' mounting calls to not only see the unredacted report but have Mueller testify.
    0
  • BobJudy
    I think Trump was sounding a little paranoid. But since he knew they were out to get him it's not really being paranoid is it?
    0
  • Don McManus
    Seems Barr accurately reported Mueller's conclusion in his first letter.

    If we are to accept the determination that there was not coordination between Russia's efforts to muddle the minds of Americans and the Trump campaign, we are left with process crimes that are a reaction to a disruptive, politically motivated investigation that should have never taken place.

    Trump seems to have made requests of people to do things to stop the investigation. He obviously wanted it ended sooner rather than later. It does not appear, however, that he took any concrete steps that resulted in the obstruction of the investigation. He did have the power to do so, yet he did not.

    Would be interesting to know when Mueller became confident that coordination between the Trump campaign and the Russian Government did not occur. If he and his team had come to this conclusion prior to the 2016 election, it should have been released so as to not affect the vote.

    Hopefully when he testifies, that question will be asked.
    0
  • mag00
    discusdad wrote:
    this was contained in a Fox News report on the Mueller report..you decide..

    This included President Trump allegedly telling his White House counsel in June 2017 to inform the acting attorney general that Mueller had conflicts of interest and "must be removed." The report said Trump also fumed over the original appointment -- lamenting it would mean the "end of his presidency" -- first telling then-DOJ leader Jeff Sessions he should resign, and later trying to get Session to take back control of the probe.

    Mueller ultimately did not reach a conclusion on whether the president's conduct amounted to obstruction, stating: "[W]hile this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

    But even though Barr's DOJ determined they did not have evidence to pursue such a case, the details in the report only fueled Democrats' mounting calls to not only see the unredacted report but have Mueller testify.

    I would throw Mueller in jail for that. That is not an unbiased report. The charges were collusion etc, the burden of proof is on the accusers. There should have only been a statement that no collusion was found. That would be the fact. Adding that it didn't clear him was narrative and bias.

    PBR drunken public radio was glomming onto that.
    0
  • wpageabc
    Sewing discord is what the democrats will continue to do. The dems will continue to divide hoping to put one of thier own in 2020 election. The dem sheeple will buy it, from what I see its happening.

    Disturbing to see the likes of Pelosi, Schumer, and the other so called leaders of this seditious movement having support.
    0
  • Mobuck
    SEW dis cord on dat jacket?
    0
  • us55840
    mag00 wrote:
    discusdad wrote:
    this was contained in a Fox News report on the Mueller report..you decide..

    This included President Trump allegedly telling his White House counsel in June 2017 to inform the acting attorney general that Mueller had conflicts of interest and "must be removed." The report said Trump also fumed over the original appointment -- lamenting it would mean the "end of his presidency" -- first telling then-DOJ leader Jeff Sessions he should resign, and later trying to get Session to take back control of the probe.

    Mueller ultimately did not reach a conclusion on whether the president's conduct amounted to obstruction, stating: "[W]hile this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

    But even though Barr's DOJ determined they did not have evidence to pursue such a case, the details in the report only fueled Democrats' mounting calls to not only see the unredacted report but have Mueller testify.

    I would throw Mueller in jail for that. That is not an unbiased report. The charges were collusion etc, the burden of proof is on the accusers. There should have only been a statement that no collusion was found. That would be the fact. Adding that it didn't clear him was narrative and bias.

    PBR drunken public radio was glomming onto that.

    Are you comparing that to Comeys' report that Hillary Clinton acted carelessly with her server/emails and may have revealed secret info but no charges will be files?
    0
  • droptop
    Sowing the Seeds of Love
    Tears for Fears


    High time, we made a stand
    And shook up the views of the common man
    The love train rides from coast to coast
    DJ's the man we love the most

    Could you be, could you be squeaky clean and smash any hope of democracy
    As the headline says you're free to choose

    There's egg on your face and mud on your shoes
    One of these days they're gonna call it the blues yeah, yeah
    Sowing the seeds of love, seeds of love, sowing the seeds
    Sowing the seeds of love, seeds of love, sowing the seeds

    I spy tears in their eyes they look to the skies
    For some kind of divine intervention
    Food goes to waste
    So nice to eat, so nice to taste

    Politician granny with your high ideals
    Have you no idea how the majority feels?
    So without love and a promised land
    We're fools to the rules of a government plan
    Kick out the style, bring back the jam, yeah, yeah
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity