High capacity magazines shipping to California
C&P
Brownells, Other Retailers Shipping Magazines to California as Fast as Possible
BY DAN ZIMMERMAN |APR 01, 2019
When Friday?s decision regarding California?s magazine ban was announced, it wasn?t quite clear how far the injunction went. But as the gun world has had time to digest the Duncan v. Becerra ruling, it became clear that Judge Benitez?s permanent injunction not only applied to Proposition 63 (which outlawed possession of standard capacity magazines), but also to the original ban on ?high capacity? magazine sales (which grandfathered in current owners) going back to 2000.
As a result, retailers have begun selling magazines that hold more than ten rounds to California customers again.
How long will this last? Good question. The state is sure to appeal the decision to the Ninth Circuit. In the mean time, California gun owners would do well to take advantage of the opportunity while they can. Here?s a press release from Brownells announcing that the flood gates are open again (and this is not an April Fool?s post). . .
Brownells Resumes Magazine Sales To California After Ruling
GRINNELL, Iowa (April 1, 2019) ? Brownells resumed selling its entire magazine selection to California customers after a U.S. District Court declared California?s ban and confiscation laws against more-than-10-round-capacity magazines unconstitutional.
Brownells began filling California orders for all types of magazines early on the morning of Monday, April 1.
All magazines shipped to California buyers are covered by Brownells legendary Forever Satisfaction Guarantee.
Customers can see Brownells extensive line of standard-capacity magazines, including Brownells? famous 30-round AR-15 magazines, at www.Brownells.com.
Brownells, Other Retailers Shipping Magazines to California as Fast as Possible
BY DAN ZIMMERMAN |APR 01, 2019
When Friday?s decision regarding California?s magazine ban was announced, it wasn?t quite clear how far the injunction went. But as the gun world has had time to digest the Duncan v. Becerra ruling, it became clear that Judge Benitez?s permanent injunction not only applied to Proposition 63 (which outlawed possession of standard capacity magazines), but also to the original ban on ?high capacity? magazine sales (which grandfathered in current owners) going back to 2000.
As a result, retailers have begun selling magazines that hold more than ten rounds to California customers again.
How long will this last? Good question. The state is sure to appeal the decision to the Ninth Circuit. In the mean time, California gun owners would do well to take advantage of the opportunity while they can. Here?s a press release from Brownells announcing that the flood gates are open again (and this is not an April Fool?s post). . .
Brownells Resumes Magazine Sales To California After Ruling
GRINNELL, Iowa (April 1, 2019) ? Brownells resumed selling its entire magazine selection to California customers after a U.S. District Court declared California?s ban and confiscation laws against more-than-10-round-capacity magazines unconstitutional.
Brownells began filling California orders for all types of magazines early on the morning of Monday, April 1.
All magazines shipped to California buyers are covered by Brownells legendary Forever Satisfaction Guarantee.
Customers can see Brownells extensive line of standard-capacity magazines, including Brownells? famous 30-round AR-15 magazines, at www.Brownells.com.
0
-
Freedom to operate. 0 -
Judging only from what I'm reading on CalGuns, it is buying frenzy! We must be talking hundreds of thousands of magazines and no one (or at least not many) are looking to buy magazines on sale. This could be a real shot in the arm for distributors who have been sitting on mountains of magazines which, after the 2016 election, they expected to sell within days-- if not hours, of Hillary being elected.
This can't last. A higher court will stay the judges ruling and then the entire matter will be dragged through the court or appeals for another two years...or even more. In the meantime, I'm with you guys back in California in spirit.0 -
California still has a DEMOCRAT supermajority and the problem isn't going away. 0 -
I have a place in OR so getting mags isn't a problem. Still, I ordered a Magpul 60 round drum from Brownells ($104.000 total) for the heck of it. Will look good on the MR1 or Robinson M96. Would have gotten the KCI Glock type 33 rounders at about $8.50 each for my Ruger PCC but they were sold out. Fun to participate I guess.
CA will do something to retaliate. I think the 1st appeal to stay has to go to the judge directly, then to the 9th. Not sure how much "fun time" is left. Hopefully it gets some CA gunowners who have done the "I'm OK with ???" restriction to taste a bit of freedom, maybe open their eyes.0 -
0 -
i will bet the pelosi,waters,fienstien are pizzing on them selfs 








0 -
It sure to be overturned by the 9th District Court. Then it'll be takien all the way up to the Supreme Court where Grinsburg will uphold the ban
0 -
remingtonoaks wrote:It sure to be overturned by the 9th District Court. Then it'll be takien all the way up to the Supreme Court where Grinsburg will uphold the ban
As old and sick as Ginsberg is, by the time it gets to the SC, she could be cold in the ground.....heck, looks like she should already be there.
0 -
the 60 round p-mags I have run well but loading is not so much fun
but enjoy your new found freedom even a road trip to buy out of state would make a great enjoy the day drivedfletcher wrote:I have a place in OR so getting mags isn't a problem. Still, I ordered a Magpul 60 round drum from Brownells ($104.000 total) for the heck of it. Will look good on the MR1 or Robinson M96. Would have gotten the KCI Glock type 33 rounders at about $8.50 each for my Ruger PCC but they were sold out. Fun to participate I guess.
CA will do something to retaliate. I think the 1st appeal to stay has to go to the judge directly, then to the 9th. Not sure how much "fun time" is left. Hopefully it gets some CA gunowners who have done the "I'm OK with ???" restriction to taste a bit of freedom, maybe open their eyes.0 -
I think dealers of gun products shouldn't sell anything to California. The majority of the people there have spoken by their votes for the bleeding heart liberals. They made their bed let them lie in it. 0 -
Smitty500mag wrote:I think dealers of gun products shouldn't sell anything to California. The majority of the people there have spoken by their votes for the bleeding heart liberals. They made their bed let them lie in it.
The majority is not everyone. There are still some there that believes in the 2A... by advocating that their 2A rights be taken away just because of where they live, you also are saying that you believe in gun control. and only certain people have a right to the Constitution and the right to bear arms.... it's not their fault that the majority of the state are communists and their rights should not be taken away because of other peoples actions
And if you truly believe that people should have their rights to keep and bear arms taken away because of other people's actions, then you're also saying that everybody's gun rights should be taken away because of some people's actions.
I simply do not believe that you think that you should have your gun rights taken away because of criminals actions of others... and trust me, taking away somebody's constitutional rights is a criminal action. And I don't really believe that you think that just because a person lives in an area that the actions of others, that the innocent should have their rights taken away either.
And if you do believe that, then count yourself as one of the anti-gun liberals0 -
Yep, all 4.2 million plus gun owners (that they know of) voted for the bleeding heart liberals, so we deserve what we get.Smitty500mag wrote:I think dealers of gun products shouldn't sell anything to California. The majority of the people there have spoken by their votes for the bleeding heart liberals. They made their bed let them lie in it.
Jeezus Smitty, have a cup of coffee before you post.0 -
Kriss Vector's gonna sit on the fence and slap and paste lawyer-ese who ever inquires. Then say go see your Kriss Vector dealer. Like a cartel layering themselves with nickle and dimers. So I guess I get to see who carries G20 magazine extenders. 0 -
If the crazy Cali DOJ reverses itself. Saving your reciept should exempt anyone in Cali who buys mags during the period should things change again. My hope is other restricted states are pressured and sued by NRA and others to follow suit. The liberties of the constitution shall not be infringed... When they are they must be challenged by free men. 0 -
California is shaped like a 30rnd mag, they should just ban the entire state. 0 -
The judge that lifted the ban on sales has reinstated it until the state's appeal is finished. As of 5 PM today we can no longer buy them but the judge says those who did can keep them. Turner's outdoorsman sent me two e-mails to be sure to buy by 5 PM but I just now saw the E-Mails. 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
16 comments