Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Comments

4 comments

Date Votes
  • Ditch-Runner
    I think we should be allowed to have any thing the military has
    no back ground checks or permits should come into play
    0
  • bundy
    I don't believe rocket launchers and nuclear bombs are firearms so they wouldn't be protected.

    But why a rifle with a barrel shorter than 16 inches is more dangerous than a 44 mag revolver so it needs to be controlled by the NFA is beyond me.
    Why does a pistols barrel length need to be restricted" Is a revolver with a 20 inch barrel so dangerous that the government needs to make them illegal unless we ask for their permission and pay them $200 to have them?
    From what I can tell most of the NFA is absolutely stupid in regards to firearms.
    0
  • SCOUT5
    quote:Originally posted by bundy
    I don't believe rocket launchers and nuclear bombs are firearms so they wouldn't be protected.

    But why a rifle with a barrel shorter than 16 inches is more dangerous than a 44 mag revolver so it needs to be controlled by the NFA is beyond me.
    Why does a pistols barrel length need to be restricted" Is a revolver with a 20 inch barrel so dangerous that the government needs to make them illegal unless we ask for their permission and pay them $200 to have them?
    From what I can tell most of the NFA is absolutely stupid in regards to firearms.


    Arms doesn't just mean firearms.
    0
  • droptop
    How do you repeal the NFA? Open the door and shout loudly three times,, I'm repealing the NFA?
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity