Hey remember when some of you called me crazy?
For saying remote influence tech might be a factor in mass shootings?
Well it's now admitted they have the technology to plant messages into your ear from a distance. Have fun with facts, Facts don't care about your feelings.
I am accepting apologies via the gun broker in box.
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/237956/20190126/new-technology-uses-laser-to-send-secret-audio-message-to-peoples-ear-here-are-its-potential-uses.htm
Well it's now admitted they have the technology to plant messages into your ear from a distance. Have fun with facts, Facts don't care about your feelings.
I am accepting apologies via the gun broker in box.
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/237956/20190126/new-technology-uses-laser-to-send-secret-audio-message-to-peoples-ear-here-are-its-potential-uses.htm
0
-
tin head covering stops that 0 -
0 -
Stops what? The fact that we have and have had the tech to plant voices in people's heads? No it don't. IN fact Tin Foil has ZERO to do with the topic. In fact again you are using the terms of the left. Are you a leftist? 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
I thought all the "victims" of shooting were actors.....but maybe it is the chemtrails causing me to think that.
Be careful for what you wish for! Where I live we got nothing but minorities committing vehicular homicide and drive-by gang shootings and people are crying out for stricter Gun control and Harsher DUI/DWI laws.
Soon you will hear a cry out for stiffer gun storage control and assault rifle bans no (grand fathering] because stupid dumb minorities can't be responsible citizens anymore. The NWO knew what would happen in my opinion.
serf
5 cops shot/wounded here just tonite with drugs and gang task force! I told you so! Open them borders and let them in now!
serf
https://dfw.cbslocal.com/2019/01/28/multiple-police-officers-shot-houston/0 -
Never cared for The term NWO.
Globalists is the way to go. Makes folks who refer to or talk about Globalists seem better grounded in some kind of tangible fact based reality. Vrs. Conjecture, innuendo, conspiracy theories and nebulous nameless groups surrounded by mysticism.0 -
quote:Originally posted by droptop
Never cared for The term NWO.
Globalists is the way to go. Makes folks who refer to or talk about Globalists seem better grounded in some kind of tangible fact based reality. Vrs. Conjecture, innuendo, conspiracy theories and nebulous nameless groups surrounded by mysticism.
FYIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtlO39wIRWshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-j1b5RlXQkkhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVYBDIkgxKo0 -
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
For saying remote influence tech might be a factor in mass shootings?
Well it's now admitted they have the technology to plant messages into your ear from a distance. Have fun with facts, Facts don't care about your feelings.
I am accepting apologies via the gun broker in box.
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/237956/20190126/new-technology-uses-laser-to-send-secret-audio-message-to-peoples-ear-here-are-its-potential-uses.htm
Which mass shootings were you claiming it to have been a factor in?0 -
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
For saying remote influence tech might be a factor in mass shootings?
Well it's now admitted they have the technology to plant messages into your ear from a distance. Have fun with facts, Facts don't care about your feelings.
I am accepting apologies via the gun broker in box.
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/237956/20190126/new-technology-uses-laser-to-send-secret-audio-message-to-peoples-ear-here-are-its-potential-uses.htm
Which mass shootings were you claiming it to have been a factor in?
Not all of them but all of them should be investigated by Congress starting with the Sandy hook shooting till the latest big ones.0 -
That explains why I bought that 10/22 . . . . . . . . . . 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
For saying remote influence tech might be a factor in mass shootings?
Well it's now admitted they have the technology to plant messages into your ear from a distance. Have fun with facts, Facts don't care about your feelings.
I am accepting apologies via the gun broker in box.
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/237956/20190126/new-technology-uses-laser-to-send-secret-audio-message-to-peoples-ear-here-are-its-potential-uses.htm
Which mass shootings were you claiming it to have been a factor in?
Not all of them but all of them should be investigated by Congress starting with the Sandy hook shooting till the latest big ones.
Sandy Hook happened in 2012. The grant for this research wasn't authorized until 2015. Are you suggesting they had a working prototype in 2012 three years before they were even granted money to begin working on it?0 -
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
For saying remote influence tech might be a factor in mass shootings?
Well it's now admitted they have the technology to plant messages into your ear from a distance. Have fun with facts, Facts don't care about your feelings.
I am accepting apologies via the gun broker in box.
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/237956/20190126/new-technology-uses-laser-to-send-secret-audio-message-to-peoples-ear-here-are-its-potential-uses.htm
Which mass shootings were you claiming it to have been a factor in?
Not all of them but all of them should be investigated by Congress starting with the Sandy hook shooting till the latest big ones.
Sandy Hook happened in 2012. The grant for this research wasn't authorized until 2015. Are you suggesting they had a working prototype in 2012 three years before they were even granted money to begin working on it?
I am saying the military industrial complex is 30 to 60 years ahead of the Private sector and even you know that.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
For saying remote influence tech might be a factor in mass shootings?
Well it's now admitted they have the technology to plant messages into your ear from a distance. Have fun with facts, Facts don't care about your feelings.
I am accepting apologies via the gun broker in box.
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/237956/20190126/new-technology-uses-laser-to-send-secret-audio-message-to-peoples-ear-here-are-its-potential-uses.htm
Which mass shootings were you claiming it to have been a factor in?
Not all of them but all of them should be investigated by Congress starting with the Sandy hook shooting till the latest big ones.
Sandy Hook happened in 2012. The grant for this research wasn't authorized until 2015. Are you suggesting they had a working prototype in 2012 three years before they were even granted money to begin working on it?
I am saying the military industrial complex is 30 to 60 years ahead of the Private sector and even you know that.
OMG that is hilarious. Indeed, I work on military programs all the time. For someone to think they are even 1 year ahead of the private sector would be funny to me. 30 to 60? What a joke.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
For saying remote influence tech might be a factor in mass shootings?
Well it's now admitted they have the technology to plant messages into your ear from a distance. Have fun with facts, Facts don't care about your feelings.
I am accepting apologies via the gun broker in box.
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/237956/20190126/new-technology-uses-laser-to-send-secret-audio-message-to-peoples-ear-here-are-its-potential-uses.htm
Which mass shootings were you claiming it to have been a factor in?
Not all of them but all of them should be investigated by Congress starting with the Sandy hook shooting till the latest big ones.
Sandy Hook happened in 2012. The grant for this research wasn't authorized until 2015. Are you suggesting they had a working prototype in 2012 three years before they were even granted money to begin working on it?
I am saying the military industrial complex is 30 to 60 years ahead of the Private sector and even you know that.
OMG that is hilarious. Indeed, I work on military programs all the time. For someone to think they are even 1 year ahead of the private sector would be funny to me. 30 to 60? What a joke.
You are either under informed or just lying here.0 -
Still Classified tech is off the table, so yes they military and government are ahead and it's anyone's guess as to how far but it;s not a week or even a year.
https://www.quora.com/How-far-advanced-is-military-technology-in-relation-to-available-consumer-tech0 -
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
Still Classified tech is off the table, so yes they military and government are ahead and it's anyone's guess as to how far but it;s not a week or even a year.
https://www.quora.com/How-far-advanced-is-military-technology-in-relation-to-available-consumer-tech
As a developer of tech for the military (special ops, and all the TLAs) THAT WORKS IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, I wouldn't have a clue what I was talking about. No siree. Just a trollin' along here. Nothing to see here. Nope. Best move along.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
Still Classified tech is off the table, so yes they military and government are ahead and it's anyone's guess as to how far but it;s not a week or even a year.
https://www.quora.com/How-far-advanced-is-military-technology-in-relation-to-available-consumer-tech
As a developer of tech for the military (special ops, and all the TLAs) THAT WORKS IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, I wouldn't have a clue what I was talking about. No siree. Just a trollin' along here. Nothing to see here. Nope. Best move along.
You are a developer? That means you don't have the tech you are developing it. If you are developing it that means no one else has it yet and you have no idea what other projects are or have developed. All you know is your own work.
Next....0 -
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
Still Classified tech is off the table, so yes they military and government are ahead and it's anyone's guess as to how far but it;s not a week or even a year.
https://www.quora.com/How-far-advanced-is-military-technology-in-relation-to-available-consumer-tech
As a developer of tech for the military (special ops, and all the TLAs) THAT WORKS IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, I wouldn't have a clue what I was talking about. No siree. Just a trollin' along here. Nothing to see here. Nope. Best move along.
You are a developer? That means you don't have the tech you are developing it. If you are developing it that means no one else has it yet and you have no idea what other projects are or have developed. All you know is your own work.
Next....
Are you saying that Mr.Perfect doesn't know what he is working on and he is compartmentalized? Or that he doesn't work at Area 51 with Jack Parson types?[;)] Seems they bump the old boy off anyway early in his career.
serf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Parsons_(rocket_engineer)
John Whiteside "Jack" Parsons (born Marvel Whiteside Parsons;[nb 1] October 2, 1914 ? June 17, 1952) was an American rocket engineer and rocket propulsion researcher, chemist, and Thelemite occultist. Associated with the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), Parsons was one of the principal founders of both the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and the Aerojet Engineering Corporation. He invented the first rocket engine to use a castable, composite rocket propellant,[1] and pioneered the advancement of both liquid-fuel and solid-fuel rockets.0 -
I am saying not all tech is secret and he's just working on developing it. He has no idea what goes on in other departments or agencies. 0 -
I stand by your thread title; nothing you could ever said could change that fact. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
For saying remote influence tech might be a factor in mass shootings?
Well it's now admitted they have the technology to plant messages into your ear from a distance. Have fun with facts, Facts don't care about your feelings.
I am accepting apologies via the gun broker in box.
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/237956/20190126/new-technology-uses-laser-to-send-secret-audio-message-to-peoples-ear-here-are-its-potential-uses.htm
Which mass shootings were you claiming it to have been a factor in?
Not all of them but all of them should be investigated by Congress starting with the Sandy hook shooting till the latest big ones.
Let's see.
A potential government/military program, and you want it investigated by Congress.
I do not think crazy goes far enough.
Don0 -
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
For saying remote influence tech might be a factor in mass shootings?
Well it's now admitted they have the technology to plant messages into your ear from a distance. Have fun with facts, Facts don't care about your feelings.
I am accepting apologies via the gun broker in box.
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/237956/20190126/new-technology-uses-laser-to-send-secret-audio-message-to-peoples-ear-here-are-its-potential-uses.htm
Which mass shootings were you claiming it to have been a factor in?
Not all of them but all of them should be investigated by Congress starting with the Sandy hook shooting till the latest big ones.
Let's see.
A potential government/military program, and you want it investigated by Congress.
I do not think crazy goes far enough.
Don
Before ANY gun control is proposed or passed I want to make sure no one in the government or people who used to work in government and now work for special interests are not involved in creating the Crisis.
Tell me you are opposed to getting all the facts before rushing to solutions!0 -
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
For saying remote influence tech might be a factor in mass shootings?
Well it's now admitted they have the technology to plant messages into your ear from a distance. Have fun with facts, Facts don't care about your feelings.
I am accepting apologies via the gun broker in box.
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/237956/20190126/new-technology-uses-laser-to-send-secret-audio-message-to-peoples-ear-here-are-its-potential-uses.htm
Which mass shootings were you claiming it to have been a factor in?
Not all of them but all of them should be investigated by Congress starting with the Sandy hook shooting till the latest big ones.
Let's see.
A potential government/military program, and you want it investigated by Congress.
I do not think crazy goes far enough.
Don
Before ANY gun control is proposed or passed I want to make sure no one in the government or people who used to work in government and now work for special interests are not involved in creating the Crisis.
Tell me you are opposed to getting all the facts before rushing to solutions!
I fully support getting facts.
Speculation, however, is less interesting.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
Still Classified tech is off the table, so yes they military and government are ahead and it's anyone's guess as to how far but it;s not a week or even a year.
https://www.quora.com/How-far-advanced-is-military-technology-in-relation-to-available-consumer-tech
As a developer of tech for the military (special ops, and all the TLAs) THAT WORKS IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, I wouldn't have a clue what I was talking about. No siree. Just a trollin' along here. Nothing to see here. Nope. Best move along.
You are a developer? That means you don't have the tech you are developing it. If you are developing it that means no one else has it yet and you have no idea what other projects are or have developed. All you know is your own work.
Next....
Yes, I am a developer that helps the military get up to the standard already available in the commercial market. I think you should stick to what you know (which seems vanishingly small), and let me comment on what I know.0 -
Feel free to tell us all how we are to get to any facts if its not investigated by congress. Or do you think we got the facts from the las Vegas police investigating the shooting there? 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
Feel free to tell us all how we are to get to any facts if its not investigated by congress. Or do you think we got the facts from the las Vegas police investigating the shooting there?
Congressional investigation are 90% posturing.
You want Sandy Hook investigated by Congress? How may Representatives or Senators would be willing to sign onto a report that even suggested it was a Red Flag operation?
Given the conspiratorial nature of many of your posts, I was surprised that you would have any confidence in a Congressional investigation on any subject, much less one as politically charged as this would be.
A Congressional investigation would be a joke.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
Feel free to tell us all how we are to get to any facts if its not investigated by congress. Or do you think we got the facts from the las Vegas police investigating the shooting there?
That's not exactly the kind of statement you want to make while trying to convince us you're not crazy...0 -
quote:Originally posted by NeoBlackdog
quote:Originally posted by Waco Waltz
Feel free to tell us all how we are to get to any facts if its not investigated by congress. Or do you think we got the facts from the las Vegas police investigating the shooting there?
That's not exactly the kind of statement you want to make while trying to convince us you're not crazy...
You give me a better idea then. This place is full of people who know better but never offer any better.0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
27 comments