Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Comments

6 comments

  • 35 Whelen
    "We'll see!?"

    [:I][;)]
    0
  • brier-49
    Barz, yes, because the currant spec pros has no evidence of any wrong doing. Trump is being investigated on the BS of the liberal media & fake stories from the libs.
    You know it's true just like the rest of us. If you can't pin real evidence on in 2 years ,, you don't have squat !
    0
  • remingtonoaks
    You're talking about Democrats, don't you no they're untouchable
    0
  • shilowar
    I wouldn't count on it....nothing will be investigated let alone prosecuted.
    0
  • Mr. Perfect
    quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
    Investigate and prosecute anyone who broke the law.

    No pardons until after sentence is served.

    You boys ready to say the same for the current Special Prosecutor's cases at hand ?
    Clearly not directed at me.
    0
  • mag00
    quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
    quote:Originally posted by brier-49
    Barz, yes, because the currant spec pros has no evidence of any wrong doing. Trump is being investigated on the BS of the liberal media & fake stories from the libs.
    You know it's true just like the rest of us. If you can't pin real evidence on in 2 years ,, you don't have squat !




    Since neither of us know anything about any indictments possibly sealed, or to be announced, it is probably wise not to make any claims about them, don't you think ?

    There are a number of people who have already pleaded guilty in the current Special Prosecutor's portfolio, do you also agree to no pardons for them, as well ?


    Do you mean like Loretta Lynch, or Joe Arpio? How about the others who were granted IMMUNITY?

    No immunity, no pardons for either side. Fair and thorough investigation and compiling of evidence and proper jail time, no exceptions for any of them. Water board them just because.

    But in Joes particular case, he still had legal avenue that had not been pursued prior to his pardon, he would need that returned to him as to exonerate himself. Then, the Attorney General would need to go after the rogue judge for the bullspit contempt charges.

    But you and I know that is not how Washington works, so what IS your point?
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity