I can't beleive it GB guys against the 2nd
The guys who hate the NRA because they are not hard line enough
Are now coming out against the right of the PEOPLE to BEAR firearms.
Now the 2nd amendment of the Constitution is being challenged by our own Constitutional experts.
Trump says the right of the people to bear arms across state lines is a goal and we hate Trump so much we use this as an excuse to not vote for him????!!!
Wow just wow
Are now coming out against the right of the PEOPLE to BEAR firearms.
Now the 2nd amendment of the Constitution is being challenged by our own Constitutional experts.
Trump says the right of the people to bear arms across state lines is a goal and we hate Trump so much we use this as an excuse to not vote for him????!!!
Wow just wow
0
-
quote:Originally posted by mark christian
It is a major inconvenience when there are voters out there who actually track the candidates stand on gun control. Two fine examples are McCain and Romney. McCain and his gun show loophole was the talk of the boards for many months, as was Romney's signing the assault weapons ban while governor of Massachusetts and his support of the 1994 Crime Bill. When these clowns decided to run for President it was decided that all would be forgiven and their previous record was supposed to be swept under the rug and forgotten. Of course there are still plenty of threads critical of their previous anti gun position in the GB archives, but anyone who dares to bring them up is a fed apples and oranges and then called a liberal Obama loving troll who should be removed from the forum.
Would that be an accurate description?
Spot on accurate.0 -
I'm Votin' Trump
And Don't Care What anyone else Thinks
And If he Don't Work out, I will Personally Accept the
I Told You So.
I won't Support the Devil0 -
quote:Originally posted by captnobody
Trump supporters are starting to turn me off more than Trump I was going to hold my nose and vote for him in the General If my guy didn't win but the way his supporters are acting third party candidate is looking better to me all the time
any votes to a third party would be a vote for Hilary.0 -
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
Charlton Heston was an Anti-Gun nut!
Well, anyone?0 -
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
Charlton Heston was an Anti-Gun nut!
Well, anyone?
http://forums.GunBroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=6688070 -
quote:Originally posted by ruger41
Trump will be EXACTLY LIKE Arnold Schwarzenegger was as Gov of CA. We thought he would be pro gun and he flip flopped the first chance he had.
4 years of trump beats 4 years of hilary, any card player should know that....................0 -
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
Charlton Heston was an Anti-Gun nut!
Well, anyone?
http://forums.GunBroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=668807
You skipped the whole point about him being an Anti-Gun Nut.0 -
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
Charlton Heston was an Anti-Gun nut!
Well, anyone?
http://forums.GunBroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=668807
You skipped the whole point about him being an Anti-Gun Nut.
Did I?0 -
quote:Originally posted by Scottymac
The guys who hate the NRA because they are not hard line enough
Are now coming out against the right of the PEOPLE to BEAR firearms.
Now the 2nd amendment of the Constitution is being challenged by our own Constitutional experts.
Trump says the right of the people to bear arms across state lines is a goal and we hate Trump so much we use this as an excuse to not vote for him????!!!
Wow just wow
It is apparent the point being made is too subtle for you.0 -
quote:Originally posted by pip5255
quote:Originally posted by captnobody
Trump supporters are starting to turn me off more than Trump I was going to hold my nose and vote for him in the General If my guy didn't win but the way his supporters are acting third party candidate is looking better to me all the time
any votes to a third party would be a vote for Hilary.
See Mark C's post.0 -
There are others here caught in a false dichotomy. The choice is not Trump vs Hillary. It is Trump vs anyone with actual conservative values. Quit supporting a non conservative like Trump while there are real conservatives still out there. Continued support of Trump could possibly end with no better choice than would you prefer death by strychnine or arsenic.
Consider the meaning of the word pandering and then look at what Trump has given the crowds. Trump has only offered cheerleading and commentary about the process of winning the nomination. No concrete plan or even well thought out plan for solving any of the problems we face. Time to lose the rose colored glasses while there is still time.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
Charlton Heston was an Anti-Gun nut!
Well, anyone?
http://forums.GunBroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=668807
You skipped the whole point about him being an Anti-Gun Nut.
Did I?
You did.0 -
quote:Originally posted by pip5255
quote:Originally posted by captnobody
Trump supporters are starting to turn me off more than Trump I was going to hold my nose and vote for him in the General If my guy didn't win but the way his supporters are acting third party candidate is looking better to me all the time
any votes to a third party would be a vote for Hilary.
That's the way these closet democrats do it. They know a vote for a 3rd party will elect a democrat.0 -
I have a question for those who support Trump and say voting your values for a third party is just helping the Dems...
What happens if the Convention is contested and Trump is not nominated and he decides to go 3rd party because he feels the RNC didn't treat him right? Will you follow him to the 3rd party and support him or will you do as you expect everyone else here to do and support Cruz or Rubio?
Me? I am not really happy with any of them. But as I have to take a stand on something, it is the 2A. So as much as I do not like them, I will support whomever the nominee is and pray that they do the right thing and not roll over on us.0 -
When did the Republican Party buy all the non-democrats?
Why do Republicans act as though they own everybody who does not vote for democrats?
(i.e. comments like "a third party vote is a vote for the democrat")
Last I checked, I don't win anything by checking the box next to the winner's name. It's not a dog race. It's a formal survey asking who I want to be the next President.
And the premise of the OP is comical.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Smitty500mag
quote:Originally posted by pip5255
quote:Originally posted by captnobody
Trump supporters are starting to turn me off more than Trump I was going to hold my nose and vote for him in the General If my guy didn't win but the way his supporters are acting third party candidate is looking better to me all the time
any votes to a third party would be a vote for Hilary.
That's the way these closet democrats do it. They know a vote for a 3rd party will
elect a democrat.
This post will help change my mind.0 -
It was small number of third party votes in Florida that pit GW Bush in the White Hoise. 0 -
I would NEVER vote for that hag EVER, --Let it play out and see, will the beast there is NO CHANCE, with Trump, good chance he is on our side, imo/ 0 -
quote:Originally posted by pip5255
quote:Originally posted by ruger41
Trump will be EXACTLY LIKE Arnold Schwarzenegger was as Gov of CA. We thought he would be pro gun and he flip flopped the first chance he had.
4 years of trump beats 4 years of hilary, any card player should know that....................
Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, signed TWO antigun laws in California. Republicans in CA of which I was one, believed he was Pro gun. One of the laws was the ridiculous microstamping and now no new semi auto pistols will be allowed in CA. We KNOW what Trumps views on "assault weapons" was...you trust him enough that he has magically changed his stance? He is playing you guys like a fiddle. Keep believing he won't sign antigun legislation or appoint liberal SCJ's. He's all about making deals and we will lose in the end. So keep on voting for the Cult of Personality.0 -
You squeeze them a little and the liberals flock to the defense of their third party choice.
So easy to expose them!0 -
Remember this little meme from a few years ago?
"Doing a good job around here is like peeing your pants in a dark suit. It gives you a warm feeling, but no one notices."
The same can be said for voting for third party candidate.0 -
One other thought:quote:Originally written by Thomas PaineGovernment, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.We cannot hope to bring about government "in its best state" overnight or with one election, but recognizing that whatever we do we will be stuck with "a necessary evil", we must strive for the lesser evil.
Common sense tells us that.
If your actions, no matter how well intended or noble, result in a greater evil, then you are just as culpable, just as guilty, as those who wish for, support, and vote for the greater evil.
In this election, Hillary is by far the greater evil.0 -
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
Charlton Heston was an Anti-Gun nut!
Well, anyone?
http://forums.GunBroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=668807
You skipped the whole point about him being an Anti-Gun Nut.
Did I?
You did.
Then, patently you did not review the provided link.0 -
When I vote I imagine being a passenger in the back of a bus heading for a cliff.
I need time to fight to the front, so I vote for the slowest drver.
Wish it was not this way, in 42 years of voting nothing has changed.[:(!]0 -
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
One other thought:quote:Originally written by Thomas PaineGovernment, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.We cannot hope to bring about government "in its best state" overnight or with one election, but recognizing that whatever we do we will be stuck with "a necessary evil", we must strive for the lesser evil.
Common sense tells us that.
If your actions, no matter how well intended or noble, result in a greater evil, then you are just as culpable, just as guilty, as those who wish for, support, and vote for the greater evil.
In this election, Hillary is by far the greater evil.
In one election? Are you referring to when Perot ran? I have news for you, 3rd party support has been building for many, many years. One election. What a silly thing to assert.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
One other thought:quote:Originally written by Thomas PaineGovernment, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.We cannot hope to bring about government "in its best state" overnight or with one election, but recognizing that whatever we do we will be stuck with "a necessary evil", we must strive for the lesser evil.
Common sense tells us that.
If your actions, no matter how well intended or noble, result in a greater evil, then you are just as culpable, just as guilty, as those who wish for, support, and vote for the greater evil.
In this election, Hillary is by far the greater evil.
In one election? Are you referring to when Perot ran? I have news for you, 3rd party support has been building for many, many years. One election. What a silly thing to assert.
Please name the third party that could garner 51% of the vote. Or even 25%. Oh, hell, I'll take 10%.0 -
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
One other thought:quote:Originally written by Thomas PaineGovernment, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.We cannot hope to bring about government "in its best state" overnight or with one election, but recognizing that whatever we do we will be stuck with "a necessary evil", we must strive for the lesser evil.
Common sense tells us that.
If your actions, no matter how well intended or noble, result in a greater evil, then you are just as culpable, just as guilty, as those who wish for, support, and vote for the greater evil.
In this election, Hillary is by far the greater evil.
In one election? Are you referring to when Perot ran? I have news for you, 3rd party support has been building for many, many years. One election. What a silly thing to assert.
Please name the third party that could garner 51% of the vote. Or even 25%. Oh, hell, I'll take 10%.
Oh, so you're one of those that only roots for the team after they're winning. I see.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
One other thought:quote:Originally written by Thomas PaineGovernment, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.We cannot hope to bring about government "in its best state" overnight or with one election, but recognizing that whatever we do we will be stuck with "a necessary evil", we must strive for the lesser evil.
Common sense tells us that.
If your actions, no matter how well intended or noble, result in a greater evil, then you are just as culpable, just as guilty, as those who wish for, support, and vote for the greater evil.
In this election, Hillary is by far the greater evil.
In one election? Are you referring to when Perot ran? I have news for you, 3rd party support has been building for many, many years. One election. What a silly thing to assert.
Please name the third party that could garner 51% of the vote. Or even 25%. Oh, hell, I'll take 10%.
Oh, so you're one of those that only roots for the team after they're winning. I see.
Who was it wrote, "3rd party support has been building for many, many years. One election. What a silly thing to assert"? So where is all this support?0 -
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
One other thought:quote:Originally written by Thomas PaineGovernment, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.We cannot hope to bring about government "in its best state" overnight or with one election, but recognizing that whatever we do we will be stuck with "a necessary evil", we must strive for the lesser evil.
Common sense tells us that.
If your actions, no matter how well intended or noble, result in a greater evil, then you are just as culpable, just as guilty, as those who wish for, support, and vote for the greater evil.
In this election, Hillary is by far the greater evil.
In one election? Are you referring to when Perot ran? I have news for you, 3rd party support has been building for many, many years. One election. What a silly thing to assert.
Please name the third party that could garner 51% of the vote. Or even 25%. Oh, hell, I'll take 10%.
Oh, so you're one of those that only roots for the team after they're winning. I see.
Who was it wrote, "3rd party support has been building for many, many years. One election. What a silly thing to assert"? So where is all this support?
That was me. Who was it that didn't understand it? That was you.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
One other thought:quote:Originally written by Thomas PaineGovernment, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.We cannot hope to bring about government "in its best state" overnight or with one election, but recognizing that whatever we do we will be stuck with "a necessary evil", we must strive for the lesser evil.
Common sense tells us that.
If your actions, no matter how well intended or noble, result in a greater evil, then you are just as culpable, just as guilty, as those who wish for, support, and vote for the greater evil.
In this election, Hillary is by far the greater evil.
In one election? Are you referring to when Perot ran? I have news for you, 3rd party support has been building for many, many years. One election. What a silly thing to assert.
Please name the third party that could garner 51% of the vote. Or even 25%. Oh, hell, I'll take 10%.
Oh, so you're one of those that only roots for the team after they're winning. I see.
Who was it wrote, "3rd party support has been building for many, many years. One election. What a silly thing to assert"? So where is all this support?
That was me. Who was it that didn't understand it? That was you.
My assertion was that quote:We cannot hope to bring about government "in its best state" overnight or with one election, but recognizing that whatever we do we will be stuck with "a necessary evil", we must strive for the lesser evil.
Your assertion was that there was some kind of great third party support for an election. This election? Who knows what you meant?
If anyone missed a message, it was Mr. Perfect.
If anyone is making unsupported claims, it is you with your imaginary third party.
If anyone doesn't understand exactly what's going on in this country right now, Mr. Perfect leads the list.
So kindly quit with the childish word games.0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
77 comments