The Donald is a punk
He makes a statement that Megyn Kelly is on the rag when he did not like her questioning, and lies about it when challenged.
He makes a statement that Carly Fiorina is ugly, and lies about it when challenged.
He mocks a disabled reporter who properly called him on a blatant lie. Lies about mocking him, and doubles down by demanding an apology.
The man is a punk. He speaking is undisciplined, and he is a bully of the worst order.
One would think that after the cult of personality disaster that is Barak Obama, voters would be smart enough to not fall for the same crap yet again. When will Trump supporters come to their senses are realize they are supporting a 70+ year old child that due to a protected upbringing has never had to face his flaws?
He is, as many of us predicted, proving himself to be a joke. The actual joke, and a sad one it is, is that there are those willfully ignorant individuals that actually believe this ass is remotely qualified to be President of our country.
Hillary is a bald faced liar and a bully.
Trump is a bald faced liar, a punk and a bully.
He would be a worse president than Bush. Worse than Obama, and frankly I believe he would be worse than Hillary if only because she will most likely have a GOP Congress to battle, whereas Trump will have one that will at some level support him because he is a Republican.
Wake up an smell the sewage, people.
He makes a statement that Carly Fiorina is ugly, and lies about it when challenged.
He mocks a disabled reporter who properly called him on a blatant lie. Lies about mocking him, and doubles down by demanding an apology.
The man is a punk. He speaking is undisciplined, and he is a bully of the worst order.
One would think that after the cult of personality disaster that is Barak Obama, voters would be smart enough to not fall for the same crap yet again. When will Trump supporters come to their senses are realize they are supporting a 70+ year old child that due to a protected upbringing has never had to face his flaws?
He is, as many of us predicted, proving himself to be a joke. The actual joke, and a sad one it is, is that there are those willfully ignorant individuals that actually believe this ass is remotely qualified to be President of our country.
Hillary is a bald faced liar and a bully.
Trump is a bald faced liar, a punk and a bully.
He would be a worse president than Bush. Worse than Obama, and frankly I believe he would be worse than Hillary if only because she will most likely have a GOP Congress to battle, whereas Trump will have one that will at some level support him because he is a Republican.
Wake up an smell the sewage, people.
0
-
43 %.......President Trump!......better than Hillary....and he can beat her... 0 -
quote:Originally posted by pwillie
43 %.......President Trump!......better than Hillary....and he can beat her...
Trump does worse vs. Hillary than all other GOP contenders.
He is probably the one GOP candidate who will never be able to beat Hillary.
Why?
Because he forfeits the honest card. Every other GOP candidate can go after Clinton's blatant lying. Trump cannot because he is just as bad.
The truth of the matter is that little Donald is in way over his head and he does not know how to get out. He may a play to position himself to be a broker in deciding who would become President. It has now gone to his head - a vast and empty space....
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html0 -
So he is a narcissist and a bold bs liar.
Jeb Bush is a neosocialist. So is rubio. I like the way Trump is stirring up the new world order socialism in the party.
I like Carson but not ready to trust Cruz. Let them duke it out.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Captplaid
So he is a narcissist and a bold bs liar.
Jeb Bush is a neosocialist. So is rubio. I like the way Trump is stirring up the new world order socialism in the party.
I like Carson but not ready to trust Cruz. Let them duke it out.
Don't let "Libertarians" spoil your trust in Trump! Trump can beat Hillary very easily....only naysayers will say different...and he want cost you a dime! Donald has the Libs(Libertarians) on the ropes...and he knows it....the Libertarians have cost the conservatives the last two Presidency's , because they stayed home...poor excuse in my opinion...0 -
Yep 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
He makes a statement that Megyn Kelly is on the rag when he did not like her questioning, and lies about it when challenged.
He makes a statement that Carly Fiorina is ugly, and lies about it when challenged.
He mocks a disabled reporter who properly called him on a blatant lie. Lies about mocking him, and doubles down by demanding an apology.
The man is a punk. He speaking is undisciplined, and he is a bully of the worst order.
One would think that after the cult of personality disaster that is Barak Obama, voters would be smart enough to not fall for the same crap yet again. When will Trump supporters come to their senses are realize they are supporting a 70+ year old child that due to a protected upbringing has never had to face his flaws?
He is, as many of us predicted, proving himself to be a joke. The actual joke, and a sad one it is, is that there are those willfully ignorant individuals that actually believe this ass is remotely qualified to be President of our country.
Hillary is a bald faced liar and a bully.
Trump is a bald faced liar, a punk and a bully.
He would be a worse president than Bush. Worse than Obama, and frankly I believe he would be worse than Hillary if only because she will most likely have a GOP Congress to battle, whereas Trump will have one that will at some level support him because he is a Republican.
Wake up an smell the sewage, people.
The only problem with that bit of conventional wisdom on Hillary being better lease we see GOP resistance is Obama has proven that idea obsolete. He gets away with almost anything he wants with hardly any opposition.0 -
Where is Rand Paul for you guys passing out your support? Have you not heard about Cruz's wife working for the CFR and Cruz's citizenship being in question like Obamas? 0 -
Donald is doing it.....Cruz is pickin his nose and chewin it...! 0 -
Donald may well be abrasive and rude tactless Etc. But he didn't pony out his children to read "Christmas Carols" and then cry about having them mimicked. So who in the R party would you vote for? Loser Bush? I've never done anything I'm like Obama Rubio? No Clue Carson? 0 -
Cruz' children being portrayed as organ grinder monkeys is being "mimicked"?
You and I have vastly different definitions for mimicry. Good grief.0 -
quote:The Donald is a punk
and the rest is Fill in the Blank___________________. No more Bush's no more Clinton's.[:D][;)]0 -
At this point ,Donald Trump is a Capitalist...Cruz is a Rhino , So are all the rest of the Republicans except maybe Paul....Donald is the head of a large Corp.....Cruz is a Texas Senator ,who hasn't done anymore than Obama!...The Republicans have owned the Congress for two years and have done nothing , so lets give a non politician a try..[;)] 0 -
Cruz. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by pwillie
43 %.......President Trump!......better than Hillary....and he can beat her...
Trump does worse vs. Hillary than all other GOP contenders.
He is probably the one GOP candidate who will never be able to beat Hillary.
Why?
Because he forfeits the honest card. Every other GOP candidate can go after Clinton's blatant lying. Trump cannot because he is just as bad.
The truth of the matter is that little Donald is in way over his head and he does not know how to get out. He may a play to position himself to be a broker in deciding who would become President. It has now gone to his head - a vast and empty space....
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
And herein lies the problem: the idiots attacking any Republican candidate they don't like for whatever trifling reason.
Haven't you learned yet?
The last election, many people on this site were crucifying Sarah Palin and John McCain, and look what we got.
You can be sure of one thing with your attacks on the Republican candidates, every negative thing you say will be used against whomever wins the nomination.
If you like a particular candidate, then talk up his or her positive points, but save the negatives for the Democrats.0 -
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by pwillie
43 %.......President Trump!......better than Hillary....and he can beat her...
Trump does worse vs. Hillary than all other GOP contenders.
He is probably the one GOP candidate who will never be able to beat Hillary.
Why?
Because he forfeits the honest card. Every other GOP candidate can go after Clinton's blatant lying. Trump cannot because he is just as bad.
The truth of the matter is that little Donald is in way over his head and he does not know how to get out. He may a play to position himself to be a broker in deciding who would become President. It has now gone to his head - a vast and empty space....
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
And herein lies the problem: the idiots attacking any Republican candidate they don't like for whatever trifling reason.
Haven't you learned yet?
The last election, many people on this site were crucifying Sarah Palin and John McCain, and look what we got.
You can be sure of one thing with your attacks on the Republican candidates, every negative thing you say will be used against whomever wins the nomination.
If you like a particular candidate, then talk up his or her positive points, but save the negatives for the Democrats.
The problem with your argument is, the things that CAN be said about Trump (negatively) aren't necessarily true of other candidates (Cruz, Carson, and Rubio... though the latter only to an extent).
The Trump train needs derailed end of story. It's a shame more folks, particularly on this board can't see thru him.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by pwillie
43 %.......President Trump!......better than Hillary....and he can beat her...
Trump does worse vs. Hillary than all other GOP contenders.
He is probably the one GOP candidate who will never be able to beat Hillary.
Why?
Because he forfeits the honest card. Every other GOP candidate can go after Clinton's blatant lying. Trump cannot because he is just as bad.
The truth of the matter is that little Donald is in way over his head and he does not know how to get out. He may a play to position himself to be a broker in deciding who would become President. It has now gone to his head - a vast and empty space....
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
And herein lies the problem: the idiots attacking any Republican candidate they don't like for whatever trifling reason.
Haven't you learned yet?
The last election, many people on this site were crucifying Sarah Palin and John McCain, and look what we got.
You can be sure of one thing with your attacks on the Republican candidates, every negative thing you say will be used against whomever wins the nomination.
If you like a particular candidate, then talk up his or her positive points, but save the negatives for the Democrats.
The problem with your argument is, the things that CAN be said about Trump (negatively) aren't necessarily true of other candidates (Cruz, Carson, and Rubio... though the latter only to an extent).
The Trump train needs derailed end of story. It's a shame more folks, particularly on this board can't see thru him.
Any candidate that pisses you off is my candidate.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Smitty500mag
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by pwillie
43 %.......President Trump!......better than Hillary....and he can beat her...
Trump does worse vs. Hillary than all other GOP contenders.
He is probably the one GOP candidate who will never be able to beat Hillary.
Why?
Because he forfeits the honest card. Every other GOP candidate can go after Clinton's blatant lying. Trump cannot because he is just as bad.
The truth of the matter is that little Donald is in way over his head and he does not know how to get out. He may a play to position himself to be a broker in deciding who would become President. It has now gone to his head - a vast and empty space....
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
And herein lies the problem: the idiots attacking any Republican candidate they don't like for whatever trifling reason.
Haven't you learned yet?
The last election, many people on this site were crucifying Sarah Palin and John McCain, and look what we got.
You can be sure of one thing with your attacks on the Republican candidates, every negative thing you say will be used against whomever wins the nomination.
If you like a particular candidate, then talk up his or her positive points, but save the negatives for the Democrats.
The problem with your argument is, the things that CAN be said about Trump (negatively) aren't necessarily true of other candidates (Cruz, Carson, and Rubio... though the latter only to an extent).
The Trump train needs derailed end of story. It's a shame more folks, particularly on this board can't see thru him.
Any candidate that pisses you off is my candidate.
The only one that does is Hillary. Have at it.0 -
Hillary 2016. She is pro-gun!! 0 -
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by pwillie
43 %.......President Trump!......better than Hillary....and he can beat her...
Trump does worse vs. Hillary than all other GOP contenders.
He is probably the one GOP candidate who will never be able to beat Hillary.
Why?
Because he forfeits the honest card. Every other GOP candidate can go after Clinton's blatant lying. Trump cannot because he is just as bad.
The truth of the matter is that little Donald is in way over his head and he does not know how to get out. He may a play to position himself to be a broker in deciding who would become President. It has now gone to his head - a vast and empty space....
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
And herein lies the problem: the idiots attacking any Republican candidate they don't like for whatever trifling reason.
Haven't you learned yet?
The last election, many people on this site were crucifying Sarah Palin and John McCain, and look what we got.
You can be sure of one thing with your attacks on the Republican candidates, every negative thing you say will be used against whomever wins the nomination.
If you like a particular candidate, then talk up his or her positive points, but save the negatives for the Democrats.
The problem with your argument is, the things that CAN be said about Trump (negatively) aren't necessarily true of other candidates (Cruz, Carson, and Rubio... though the latter only to an extent).
The Trump train needs derailed end of story. It's a shame more folks, particularly on this board can't see thru him.
There is no problem with my argument, but there is with your comprehension.
The point is not that any of the Republican hopefuls have negatives, but that you and others are doing the democrats' job for them by emphasizing them.
Instead of bad mouthing, try talking about the strengths of the candidates that YOU like and forget attacking the ones you don't.0 -
Trump(the punk)...is taking names....Trump is getting bigger than the Nation![;)] 0 -
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by pwillie
43 %.......President Trump!......better than Hillary....and he can beat her...
Trump does worse vs. Hillary than all other GOP contenders.
He is probably the one GOP candidate who will never be able to beat Hillary.
Why?
Because he forfeits the honest card. Every other GOP candidate can go after Clinton's blatant lying. Trump cannot because he is just as bad.
The truth of the matter is that little Donald is in way over his head and he does not know how to get out. He may a play to position himself to be a broker in deciding who would become President. It has now gone to his head - a vast and empty space....
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
And herein lies the problem: the idiots attacking any Republican candidate they don't like for whatever trifling reason.
Haven't you learned yet?
The last election, many people on this site were crucifying Sarah Palin and John McCain, and look what we got.
You can be sure of one thing with your attacks on the Republican candidates, every negative thing you say will be used against whomever wins the nomination.
If you like a particular candidate, then talk up his or her positive points, but save the negatives for the Democrats.
I did not mention Palin or McCain once during the last election, Joe. [:)]
Talking people up is always more challenging that bringing them down, as history has shown us.
Ted Cruz, other than his bellicose approach to the use of the military and potentially his flawed support of a VAT light holds very positive positions on all major issues. His downside is an abrasive personality that the McConnell and probably Ryan will object to and allow their personal affront to derail those positive issues Cruz would try to implement.
Rubio has a better chance to work with Congress, but his position on NSA surveillance suggests a support of Big Government at the expense of the individual that is off-putting. I do believe that he would be a more effective POTUS than either Trump or Cruz because he is a more measured individual, and displays a temperament that would allow for movement on fiscally conservative issues that he and the vast majority of the GOP state that they hold.
Paul, yes Paul once again, scores virtually 100% on the issues that liberty minded individuals hold dear. He is more measured than Cruz, but would face a groundswell of objection by the rank and file GOP because he believes too much in the rights of the individual regarding the meaningless social issues that seem to be so important to the social conservative idiocy that makes up much of the GOP base. His reluctance to call for the carpet bombing of the Middle East, while the obviously proper position, does not curry favor to the power mad segment of the GOP base as well.
If we want a pure Constitutional approach to the office of POTUS, Rand Paul is the obvious choice. His problem is that he has virtually no constituency in the House and Senate, and his (and the country's) most important positions will be tough to get through.
If we want an improved neo-con approach to the office of POTUS, Cruz fits the bill well, and though he would have difficulty getting his largest issues implemented, would serve well to begin to steer the ship of state back to a Republic that better respects the Constitution upon which it is based.
If you want a classic neo-con position, pushed slightly towards the Constitution, Marco Rubio is a reasonable suggestion, and may, in reality be the best selection. He, for the most part, seems to understand the meaning of the 9th and 10th Amendments, and would probably be the most effective of the three in getting things implemented. He would embark this nation on a incremental, though somewhat flawed direction change towards the Constitution, and has the greatest chance of success in getting this started.
If you want an ignorant, big government narcissist to replace the current ignorant big government narcissist; a man who strongly believes in the power of the Federal Government (and who probably has never even read the U.S. Constitution) Trump fits this bill well. He would be a continuation of the Obama Presidency where the office of POTUS is subservient to the emotion and whims of the man who occupies the post.0 -
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by pwillie
43 %.......President Trump!......better than Hillary....and he can beat her...
Trump does worse vs. Hillary than all other GOP contenders.
He is probably the one GOP candidate who will never be able to beat Hillary.
Why?
Because he forfeits the honest card. Every other GOP candidate can go after Clinton's blatant lying. Trump cannot because he is just as bad.
The truth of the matter is that little Donald is in way over his head and he does not know how to get out. He may a play to position himself to be a broker in deciding who would become President. It has now gone to his head - a vast and empty space....
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
And herein lies the problem: the idiots attacking any Republican candidate they don't like for whatever trifling reason.
Haven't you learned yet?
The last election, many people on this site were crucifying Sarah Palin and John McCain, and look what we got.
You can be sure of one thing with your attacks on the Republican candidates, every negative thing you say will be used against whomever wins the nomination.
If you like a particular candidate, then talk up his or her positive points, but save the negatives for the Democrats.
The problem with your argument is, the things that CAN be said about Trump (negatively) aren't necessarily true of other candidates (Cruz, Carson, and Rubio... though the latter only to an extent).
The Trump train needs derailed end of story. It's a shame more folks, particularly on this board can't see thru him.
There is no problem with my argument, but there is with your comprehension.
The point is not that any of the Republican hopefuls have negatives, but that you and others are doing the democrats' job for them by emphasizing them.
Instead of bad mouthing, try talking about the strengths of the candidates that YOU like and forget attacking the ones you don't.
I started an entire thread on it. Feel free to join in, or at least pay attention.0 -
Great, Mr. Perfect,you got half the message, but you missed the part about, "...forget attacking the ones you don't [like]. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
Great, Mr. Perfect,you got half the message, but you missed the part about, "...forget attacking the ones you don't [like].
And you didn't get the other half of my earlier message: the attacks on Trump are specific to his character, not something that can be similarly leveraged against the other GOP candidates.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by pwillie
43 %.......President Trump!......better than Hillary....and he can beat her...
Trump does worse vs. Hillary than all other GOP contenders.
He is probably the one GOP candidate who will never be able to beat Hillary.
Why?
Because he forfeits the honest card. Every other GOP candidate can go after Clinton's blatant lying. Trump cannot because he is just as bad.
The truth of the matter is that little Donald is in way over his head and he does not know how to get out. He may a play to position himself to be a broker in deciding who would become President. It has now gone to his head - a vast and empty space....
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
And herein lies the problem: the idiots attacking any Republican candidate they don't like for whatever trifling reason.
Haven't you learned yet?
The last election, many people on this site were crucifying Sarah Palin and John McCain, and look what we got.
You can be sure of one thing with your attacks on the Republican candidates, every negative thing you say will be used against whomever wins the nomination.
If you like a particular candidate, then talk up his or her positive points, but save the negatives for the Democrats.
I did not mention Palin or McCain once during the last election, Joe. [:)]
Talking people up is always more challenging that bringing them down, as history has shown us.
Ted Cruz, other than his bellicose approach to the use of the military and potentially his flawed support of a VAT light holds very positive positions on all major issues. His downside is an abrasive personality that the McConnell and probably Ryan will object to and allow their personal affront to derail those positive issues Cruz would try to implement.
Rubio has a better chance to work with Congress, but his position on NSA surveillance suggests a support of Big Government at the expense of the individual that is off-putting. I do believe that he would be a more effective POTUS than either Trump or Cruz because he is a more measured individual, and displays a temperament that would allow for movement on fiscally conservative issues that he and the vast majority of the GOP state that they hold.
Paul, yes Paul once again, scores virtually 100% on the issues that liberty minded individuals hold dear. He is more measured than Cruz, but would face a groundswell of objection by the rank and file GOP because he believes too much in the rights of the individual regarding the meaningless social issues that seem to be so important to the social conservative idiocy that makes up much of the GOP base. His reluctance to call for the carpet bombing of the Middle East, while the obviously proper position, does not curry favor to the power mad segment of the GOP base as well.
If we want a pure Constitutional approach to the office of POTUS, Rand Paul is the obvious choice. His problem is that he has virtually no constituency in the House and Senate, and his (and the country's) most important positions will be tough to get through.
If we want an improved neo-con approach to the office of POTUS, Cruz fits the bill well, and though he would have difficulty getting his largest issues implemented, would serve well to begin to steer the ship of state back to a Republic that better respects the Constitution upon which it is based.
If you want a classic neo-con position, pushed slightly towards the Constitution, Marco Rubio is a reasonable suggestion, and may, in reality be the best selection. He, for the most part, seems to understand the meaning of the 9th and 10th Amendments, and would probably be the most effective of the three in getting things implemented. He would embark this nation on a incremental, though somewhat flawed direction change towards the Constitution, and has the greatest chance of success in getting this started.
If you want an ignorant, big government narcissist to replace the current ignorant big government narcissist; a man who strongly believes in the power of the Federal Government (and who probably has never even read the U.S. Constitution) Trump fits this bill well. He would be a continuation of the Obama Presidency where the office of POTUS is subservient to the emotion and whims of the man who occupies the post.
Yes, but he has his own jet,and will stay at his own hotels when vacationing....and he is White![:o)]....with 4 billion dollars...0 -
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
Great, Mr. Perfect,you got half the message, but you missed the part about, "...forget attacking the ones you don't [like].
And you didn't get the other half of my earlier message: the attacks on Trump are specific to his character, not something that can be similarly leveraged against the other GOP candidates.
Which is totally irrelevant.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
I guess the "favorite turd" approach is no longer an operative approach.
I can't believe(Christian, Jewdin,and Muslim)feelings you have,that you would use that phrase...(turd)I am very disappointed![xx(]0 -
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
Neither obscene, nor pornographic, and placed in quotes because that is the expression to which I am referring, which was not of my origin. I don't parade it around.Just poor taste.quote:Did you say anything when that was the common expression here during the last election ?Irrelevant to the discussion.0 -
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
Of course it is relevant.
Whining about "poor taste" doesn't mean much when such a claim appears to be very selectively applied.
It would seem that it is only in poor taste to you if it calls people to some sort of accountability and consistency with their previous posts. Or if I use it and you can't think of anything else to complain about.
If you have objected to its use anywhere here, feel free to post the cite.
A quick and easy google of the term returns over 2,000 uses of the term in one way or another in these forums.
Should provide plenty of opportunities.
Barz , go get a bar of soap and suck on it...be nice..[:o)]0 -
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
quote:Originally posted by Mr. Perfect
quote:Originally posted by tallcharlie
Great, Mr. Perfect,you got half the message, but you missed the part about, "...forget attacking the ones you don't [like].
And you didn't get the other half of my earlier message: the attacks on Trump are specific to his character, not something that can be similarly leveraged against the other GOP candidates.
Which is totally irrelevant.
You mean, except for being the crux of your argument.0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
74 comments