Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Interesting Read on 68' GCA

Comments

19 comments

  • pickenup
    Hmmmm....
    I was just reading this AGAIN this last week.
    I have seen reference to the accusation that the NRA was FOR the '68 ban, at first. This is the only one that was missing. Which would mean they had a hand in passing every major federal gun law that we have today.

    Comparing the German law to ours does tend to open some eyes. [:(!]
    0
  • COBmmcmss
    Thank you for the enlightening comparison. Side-by-side comparison "should" help to wake up some of those whom are asleep at the switch at the voting booth, but it will take a lot more to wake up so many.

    Keep up the info.

    COB
    0
  • Rocklobster
    Good read. All because of the Kennedy and King assassinations. Typical of the progressive mindset.
    0
  • Highball
    I wonder if the OP read it..and learned a tiny bit more about what has forged men such as the Canary Asses ?
    0
  • wsfiredude
    quote:Originally posted by Highball
    I wonder if the OP read it..and learned a tiny bit more about what has forged men such as the Canary Asses ?


    I doubt it, as he still unable to discern such simple concepts as rights vs. privileges.
    0
  • Rockatansky
    Reading ability != cognition.
    0
  • txfeller
    quote:Originally posted by pickenup
    Hmmmm....
    I was just reading this AGAIN this last week.
    I have seen reference to the accusation that the NRA was FOR the '68 ban, at first. This is the only one that was missing. Which would mean they had a hand in passing every major federal gun law that we have today.

    Comparing the German law to ours does tend to open some eyes. [:(!]


    Sorry guy, but that is total bs. I remember those days very well.

    Before gca1968, you could find ads for surplus guns in the back of any magazine. All you had to do was check the box of the one you wanted, check a little box that stated you were of a certain age, send them a money order, then wait for the postman to deliver it to your door. Any kid that made some money from mowing lawns could order one.

    Like it or not, the NRA has always believed in responsible gun ownership, and that was the "gun right" they supported doing away with, due to the fact that no proof of age was actually verified, or even required. When more was tacked on to the bill, they immediately sent letters to members urging them to write their congressmen and senators to oppose it.
    0
  • Highball
    txfeller
    Starting Member;

    Ahhh..ANOTHER nra shill.

    Perhaps it would behoove you to actually study some of the information on this forum...before you make a complete fool of yourself.
    0
  • pickenup
    quote:Originally posted by txfeller
    quote:Originally posted by pickenup
    Hmmmm....
    I was just reading this AGAIN this last week.
    I have seen reference to the accusation that the NRA was FOR the '68 ban, at first. This is the only one that was missing. Which would mean they had a hand in passing every major federal gun law that we have today.

    Comparing the German law to ours does tend to open some eyes. [:(!]


    Sorry guy, but that is total bs.
    txfeller,
    Specifically, what part of my post is total bs?

    quote:Originally posted by txfeller
    Like it or not, the NRA has always believed in responsible gun ownership, and that was the "gun right" they supported doing away with
    Are you confirming that the NRA initially SUPPORTED the GCA-68?
    0
  • txfeller
    Highball
    Advanced member;

    Ahh...ANOTHER message forum self appointed hall monitor.

    Pretty typical. You base nothing on facts, tell me I need to "educate myself", Call me a shill...........

    Hey, know what? I've got a great idea. Why don't you go bleen yourself!
    0
  • txfeller
    quote:Originally posted by pickenup
    quote:Originally posted by txfeller
    quote:Originally posted by pickenup
    Hmmmm....
    I was just reading this AGAIN this last week.
    I have seen reference to the accusation that the NRA was FOR the '68 ban, at first. This is the only one that was missing. Which would mean they had a hand in passing every major federal gun law that we have today.

    Comparing the German law to ours does tend to open some eyes. [:(!]


    Sorry guy, but that is total bs.
    txfeller,
    Specifically, what part of my post is total bs?

    quote:Originally posted by txfeller
    Like it or not, the NRA has always believed in responsible gun ownership, and that was the "gun right" they supported doing away with
    Are you confirming that the NRA initially SUPPORTED the GCA-68?

    It's common knowledge that the NRA initially supported the bill, and yes I do confirm that. The part of your post that I disagree with is the end, where you thought the NRA had a major hand in all gun control.

    The GCA1968 started out small, basically just common sense regulations. But then it really took off and turned into the monster that it became. Truth be known, the only thing that stopped more gun control bills was president Nixon going before congress and telling them that he would not sign any more bills containing gun control, and to get on to other business.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm certainly not the biggest fan of the NRA. But when the gca1968 started turning into a gun control bill instead of a simple restriction, the NRA did fight it with all they had, which in those days wasn't much.

    To be honest, I think that all the discrepancies of facts stem from the fact that the NRA takes some credit for shutting down gun control in that period. But the truth is that they were pretty ineffective and that it was actually Nixon that shut it down.

    But I do hope that explains it to your satisfaction.


    Editing to add a comment. Looking back at it all, that one instance is what started a totally new outlook for gun owners, and the gun lobby. By agreeing to a couple of restrictions that seemed like common sense, then having to turn around and fight with everything they had, while losing badly, the gun lobby and gun owners quickly learned that to give up any right just starts a feeding frenzy on the part of the anti gunners. And ever since, they have wisely not budged one inch on any gun right.
    0
  • atticus69
    as an aside to the original post, I had a friend (now dead) who was a jeep driver for officers during and after WWII. He said that they would go to the mayor's office in every new town they occupied in Germany as one of their 1st stops and pick up the registration list of every gun owner in town (required by the nazis) and then use that to confiscate the guns.
    0
  • Don McManus
    quote:Originally posted by txfeller

    Sorry guy, but that is total bs. I remember those days very well.

    Before gca1968, you could find ads for surplus guns in the back of any magazine. All you had to do was check the box of the one you wanted, check a little box that stated you were of a certain age, send them a money order, then wait for the postman to deliver it to your door. Any kid that made some money from mowing lawns could order one.

    Like it or not, the NRA has always believed in responsible gun ownership, and that was the "gun right" they supported doing away with, due to the fact that no proof of age was actually verified, or even required. When more was tacked on to the bill, they immediately sent letters to members urging them to write their congressmen and senators to oppose it.

    I've always been a big fan of 'I was for it before I was against it.' posturing.
    0
  • Highball
    quote:Ahh...ANOTHER message forum self appointed hall monitor.
    Nahhh..just somebody with the balls to call BS on gun controllers.

    You use the term 'reasonable gun restrictions'...tossing it about sorta like...oh, I don't know....shumer,kennedy, pelosie..you know..rabid gun controllers.

    Don't take long to spot 'em.

    I invite you ONE MORE TIME....look up Pickenup's thread on the NRA. THERE are the Facts. Read it and weep for your ignorance about the NRA supporting gun control.
    0
  • pickenup
    quote:Originally posted by txfeller
    The part of your post that I disagree with is the end, where you thought the NRA had a major hand in all gun control.
    Where I thought? ROFL.

    Believe it or not, this topic has been discussed "a few" times on this forum. I "USED TO" think like the members that have not had their eyes opened. I was challenged to do the research for myself. I accepted this challenge. Only a part of what I found is contained in the links below. There is more.

    The links below are for your edification....
    After reading them, if you will, come back and tell us your thoughts.

    http://forums.gunbroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=372896

    http://forums.gunbroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=287342

    http://forums.gunbroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=263795
    quote:Originally posted by Highball
    I invite you ONE MORE TIME....look up Pickenup's thread on the NRA. THERE are the Facts.
    OK Highball, I admit it. I cheated and helped him to find some of those FACTS.
    [}:)] [;)] [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]
    0
  • Permanently deleted user
    txfeller wrote

    "By agreeing to a couple of restrictions that seemed like common sense,"

    even with my newbie eyes, this guy is a pro-gun control drone.

    I've never seen the rape of 2 words like when it's used to explain violation of our rights.

    Back to the Loch with you, Nessie.
    0
  • txfeller
    Nothing could be further from the truth than your statement. If I recall, we were referring to the year 1968. Not 1969 or later. Up until that fateful year, congress had always negotiated with gun owners and I remember how shocked everyone was, and how betrayed they felt when congress took the action they did. There was also no internet, or even a fax machine. All the nra and gun clubs could do was write letters and tell everyone to spread the word to write letters.

    The only gun right I agreed with restricting was the right for a kid below the age of responsibility to buy a gun without their parents knowledge, and I still have that conviction. If that makes me a crazy gun control nut in your eyes, then so be it. Trust me, I can deal with it. But for the last couple of decades, I have regularly called my congressmans office to ask him to oppose upcoming gun bills. And I've also called his office on occasion to thank him for diligently doing just that. How about you?

    Happy new year!

    quote:Originally posted by PBJloaf
    txfeller wrote

    "By agreeing to a couple of restrictions that seemed like common sense,"

    even with my newbie eyes, this guy is a pro-gun control drone.

    I've never seen the rape of 2 words like when it's used to explain violation of our rights.

    Back to the Loch with you, Nessie.
    0
  • guntech59
    quote:Originally posted by txfeller

    The only gun right I agreed with restricting was the right for a kid below the age of responsibility to buy a gun without their parents knowledge, and I still have that conviction.

    Why do we need a law to make parents do their duty?

    We have too many laws now. Laws like that take away the responsibilty of the parents and give it to the government.

    Just my opinion, of course. I am very into personal responsibility.
    0
  • Highball
    Txfeller;
    Time for you to look deeper into history, at the machine gun act of the 30's. Examine the nras part in that..and the things said by the then-nra president.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?