OBCA - crew-served weapons in America

Matchshot

February 28, 2009 05:55

In the test that is given why do you stipulate non-crew-served weapons in America are not subject to infringement instead of all weapons? Not trying to be a wiseguy, just want to know where that is stipulated in the 2nd A.

0

• 

  Permanently deleted user

  February 28, 2009 06:26

  quote:Originally posted by Matchshot
  In the test that is given why do you stipulate non-crew-served weapons in America are not subject to infringement instead of all weapons? Not trying to be a wiseguy, just want to know where that is stipulated in the 2nd A.
  Can't answer that.
  
  I didn't make the test, nor did I take it. Matter of fact, I don't much care for "the test" either.

  0
• 

  Matchshot

  February 28, 2009 06:45

  quote:Originally posted by lt496
  quote:Originally posted by Matchshot
  In the test that is given why do you stipulate non-crew-served weapons in America are not subject to infringement instead of all weapons? Not trying to be a wiseguy, just want to know where that is stipulated in the 2nd A.
  Can't answer that.
  
  I didn't make the test, nor did I take it. Matter of fact, I don't much care for "the test" either.
  
  
  
  
  Maybe its not politically correct[:D]

  0
• 

  rkba4ever

  February 28, 2009 07:25

  I think (and this is just my take) that "crew-served" would be more likely to be something stored in a local armory (i.e. cannon and such stored by local militia during colonial days) and not in individual possesion, but still available should the need arise. It comes down to what an individual soldier can carry (the BEAR part of 2A).

  0

Please sign in to leave a comment.