Skip to main content
Thank you for your patience as we work through our high volume of requests. If you need assistance with 2FA, please provide the correct phone number in your ticket request so we can assist quicker.
Help Center Community Shop

Solved a primer mystery

Comments

5 comments

  • nemesisenforcer
    I've never had issues with remington primers, but I haven't used many of them in comparison to CCI or winchester either.
    0
  • rovernut
    at one time the only magnum rifle primers I could get wwere remingtons. I"ve been useing them in 300 weatherby, 300 WM, 257 weatherby, 338 WM and 375 H&H. no problems backing out or signs of excess pressure. these loads are all in Remington brass, does this make a difference??
    0
  • cpermd
    Primer brand and primer pocket dimensions all make a difference.

    CP
    0
  • JustC
    bolt action or semi-auto?
    0
  • Tailgunner1954
    quote:I measured Federal #200 Magnums, CCC #500, Win WSP, and they all measured 0.1750 with my digital calipers. I measured the Remington #1 1/2 primers and they were 0.1745. I know 0.0005" doesn't sound like much,
    Not to bust your bubble, but calipers (regardless of readout methiod) are not accurate enough to be reading to 5 tenths. For that matter a standard micrometer is not capable of splitting tenth's accuratly.
    To accuraty measure the kinds of differences your looking at you need a good, direct read, tenths mic, and hold the primers in tweezers while you take your measurments (the heat from your fingers will cause greater expansion than the difference your trying to measure).
    Also, you would need to measure a random selection of say 50pcs out of a brick to get a staticticly valid sample.

    General measuring rule:
    Calipers, within .0050 (thats OK, because as reloaders our tolerances are quite loose).
    Standard Micrometer, with in .0010
    Tenth's Mic, to .0001
    Finer than that you should be using a CMM
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?