Skip to main content
Chat will be unavailable Friday July 3rd, in observance of the July 4th Holiday.
Help Center Community Shop

Primer's capability?

Comments

9 comments

  • Rocky Raab
    While a primer won't usually propel a bullet out of the barrel, and especially not a rifle barrel, it is possible.

    If the bore was clean and the bullet a bit undersized, it might. It might also be that there was some powder in the round. Conceivably, only a few kernels could do it. Of course, it could have been bad powder, degraded by oil or storage conditions.

    It's way too late to learn the answers now.
    0
  • XXCross
    I'd put my money on a "squib" load.
    I've never seen a primer that would expel
    a bullet from a rifle barrel...not even
    "MAGNUM" primers.
    0
  • perry shooter
    I don't believe any primer would have enough power by it's self to Propel a bullet from either a 243 or 270 case and engrave the rifling and go the length of the barrel and then drop 10 feet in front of the muzzle. You could however take a primed 243 case and chamber in a control feed rifle of 270 caliber and then I believe you would get the bullet out the barrel and a POP. [?][?][?]
    0
  • jonk
    I've gotten a few lodged... never more than 5-6" down the bore. And no, I didn't blow anything up, I knew right off something was wrong.

    Not in a rifle but a 38 special, I had a squib load from bridging powder flakes on an automatic dispenser. Near as I can guess, maybe 1/3 of 1 grain of red dot. Spit the bullet out, hit the sand about 15 feet out.

    Ergo I vote squib as well.
    0
  • Rocky Raab
    I hadn't thought of what perry said, but it WOULD be possible to chamber a 243 in a 270 rifle and have it held in place by the extractor well enough to fire. And then it would go "Pop, phoosh."

    The original poster didn't mention anything about the empty being blown out (which it would be) or most of a charge of unburnt powder (which there would also be) but he got it second hand and years later, so ...
    0
  • glabray
    I once had a very similar experience with some .30-06 ammo that had been hand loaded about 30 years prior to my firing it. About 1 in every 5 rounds acted like the powder load was way too light. We pulled the bullets from several rounds and found the powder weight to be exactly as indicated on the box label. Visually, the powder looked fine also. So we had the powder from several rounds analyzed. The analysis showed a worrysome level of petroleum in the powder from a couple of the tested rounds but a very low level in the others. We speculated that some of the cases must have gotten a bit too much case lube inside and over the 30 years of sitting around the lube had degraded some of the powder.
    0
  • Bergtreffer
    Thank you, one and all. I greatly appreciate your input, and your replies have been quite informative. A squib load is a possibility, however I believe that glabray may have a very good point. It is quite likely that the propellant became contaminated over the years from case lubricant. My brother mentioned that my father loaded the ammunition in 1965, and it has been sitting around every since. My brother has confirmed that the rifle was a Winchester Model-70 in .270 caliber.

    Once again, thank you all very much. Bergtreffer.
    0
  • Colonel Plink
    I've had powder hang up in the throat of my powder measure, letting just enough into the case to do what was described.

    I've also had a magnum primer (no powder) drive a hard-cast lead bullet just far enough into the forcing cone of my S&W 28 to lock up the cylinder. Thank God it didn't go completely into the barrel.

    I'm certainly not going to cast aspersions on anybody's loading practices. My theory is that, over the course of loading tens of thousands of rounds, mistakes can certainly occur. Even to the most seasoned hand loader.
    0
  • v35
    My money is on old primers as I've had the same experiences using old reloads having older primers.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?