Skip to main content
Chat will be unavailable Friday July 3rd, in observance of the July 4th Holiday.
Help Center Community Shop

Reform W/O Annealing

Comments

5 comments

  • bpost
    Why avoid a simple case and effort saving step?
    0
  • XXCross
    I've converted many hundreds of military '06 to 8x57 and never bothered to annealed any of them. Never found it to be required.
    The change in shoulder area is not all that extreem. If your worried about dimples etc, do the reforming in two steps.
    0
  • FWAddit
    quote:Originally posted by XXCross

    I've converted many hundreds of military '06 to 8x57 and never bothered to annealed any of them. Never found it to be required.
    The change in shoulder area is not all that extreem. If your worried about dimples etc, do the reforming in two steps.


    Me, too. Well, not hundreds--dozens. I keep thinking I really ought to anneal those cases, and keep not getting around to it. Haven't had any split necks yet, but then the cases have been reloaded only 3 or 4 times.
    0
  • DENWA
    I've done it both ways. I found no difference in performance.

    I did have a case that anneled too soft and stuck in the die when Rim ripped off during forming.

    I no longer anneal. But do your self a favor and use Military Brass as to not get someone hurt with accidental chambering in a 30-06.
    0
  • CHEVELLE427
    quote:Originally posted by FWAddit
    quote:Originally posted by XXCross

    I've converted many hundreds of military '06 to 8x57 and never bothered to annealed any of them. Never found it to be required.
    The change in shoulder area is not all that extreem. If your worried about dimples etc, do the reforming in two steps.


    Me, too. Well, not hundreds--dozens. I keep thinking I really ought to anneal those cases, and keep not getting around to it. Haven't had any split necks yet, but then the cases have been reloaded only 3 or 4 times.


    same here
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?