Skip to main content
Thank you for your patience as we work through our high volume of requests. If you need assistance with 2FA, please provide the correct phone number in your ticket request so we can assist quicker.
Help Center Community Shop

Burris Fullfield or Nikon Buckmaster?

ChetStafford
Will be picking up my new Abolt on Friday and need a new scope for it

It will be a coyote and general varmint rifle

It is chambered in .223 wssm

I am looking at the fullfeild 4x12x44 or the buckmaster 4x12x50

Any suggestions?
0

Comments

16 comments

Date Votes
  • B17-P51
    Burris, Since those are the only choices you mentioned.
    0
  • Cubslover
    You picked the best two scopes for the money. It's personal preference.

    Burris uses a lens coating which filters out the Ultraviolet lights and the Infrared's are much brighter. So you'll see that red's, oranges, and yellow's are brighter.

    Nikon is the opposite, they filter the infrareds and concentrate more on the Ultraviolets. Blues, greys, and greens are brighter in the Nikons.

    Nikon, I see as the brighter scope under hunting conditions and I recommend it over the Burris.

    You really can't go wrong with either.
    0
  • goldeneagle76
    Have a Fullfield II and love it, would be my vote.
    0
  • JustC
    Burris,..it's it and that's that,...from the choices you have. Burris is top notch and I can personally attest to their FAST and NO BS warranty.
    0
  • ChetStafford
    Well I am no big fan of Leupold as far as I can tell they are not really any better than Nikon or Burris

    I have 2 Nikon Monarch's.

    I did also consider the Bushnell 3200 elite and don't know anyone who has one and can't find any localy so that I can look at them

    It seems like it is easier to find a house than a scope ypu are satified with[;)]
    0
  • Sig220_Ruger77
    Burris Fullfield.

    Jon
    0
  • wynn24
    Burris Fullfied
    0
  • bradking1
    Burris
    0
  • konamtbiker
    I have the two scopes on 2 of my rifles. Burris will be the way to go. Buckmasters is a good scope. The Monarch is much better though than the Buckmasters. Good Hunting
    0
  • Mk 19
    For the two theat you picked I would go with the Burris, but if you could find a Nikon Monarch then go with the Nikon, it is a great scope and I favor it over Leupolds that are twice the price.
    0
  • ChetStafford
    I got to looking on Midsouth and found a Nikon Monarch 4x16x42 side focus with a BDC recticle for $359

    My search is over this is the scope I am going to buy.
    0
  • bgjohn
    quote:Originally posted by konamtbiker
    I have the two scopes on 2 of my rifles. Burris will be the way to go. Buckmasters is a good scope. The Monarch is much better though than the Buckmasters. Good Hunting


    Monarchs cost twice as much. I love the two buckmasters that I have.
    JM
    0
  • ChetStafford
    quote:Originally posted by bgjohn
    Monarchs cost twice as much. I love the two buckmasters that I have.
    JM


    The buckmaster that I was looking at was $359 The Monarch I am going to buy is $359 so I will get the Monarch they are good glass for a very fair price[;)]
    0
  • konamtbiker
    You will not be upset! Monarch is a great optic.
    0
  • bgjohn
    That is a good price for the Monarch.
    JM[:)]
    0
  • ahankster
    Nikon all the way.
    I have three and a fourth on the way. Two are 4.5x14 monarchs and one 3x9 prostaff. For the same money, there just isn't any comparison, in my humble opinion.
    I just picked up a Rock River Varmint w/ a 24inch ss barrel. You can bet the next scope on it will be something similar, but in a mil-dot.
    Hank
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?