Nikon Titanium
Does anyone have an opinion on this scope as compared to say a leupold? The one I am looking at is the 3.3X10
0
-
I have not used the Titanium, but have Monarchs. They rank up with Leupold at a little less money. I have heard service is difficult on Nikons, but have had no need of service. As midrange optics the Monarchs are well worth the price. 0 -
STAY AWAY FROM NICONS, I tried to get one repaired e-mailed factory, they wanted my sales reciept and my warenty papers. I have lost that stuff so I have a broken scope that ratteled lose on a 22-250. 0 -
Nikons - good glass. New lower pricing since they moved some manufacturing from Philipines to Thailand.Titanium not worth $$, since the the only the main tube is titanium. If wanting a superlight, rugged scope, get the Burris Mr. T. All titanium, stronger, and better optics.Chuck, try finding a friendly dealer who will send the scope back for you using the business letterhead. I've done this many times with differnt products for my customers, and yet have one not work out.
Happy Bullet Holes![This message has been edited by Guns & Glass (edited 01-09-2002).]0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
3 comments