Garand serial #
I bought a CMP Danish issue with a Springfield reciever awhile back. Serial is 413xxx. Am I correct in believing this is a prewar reciever? Thanks.
jon
"...hit your enemy in the belly, and kick him when he is down, and boil his prisoners in oil- if you take any- and torture his women and children. Then people will keep clear of you..." -Admiral of the Fleet Lord Fisher, speaking at the Hague Peace Conf
jon
"...hit your enemy in the belly, and kick him when he is down, and boil his prisoners in oil- if you take any- and torture his women and children. Then people will keep clear of you..." -Admiral of the Fleet Lord Fisher, speaking at the Hague Peace Conf
0
-
The serial # indicates the your receiver was made at the Springfield Armory in December, 1941....so pre-war or wartime depends on whether it was made before or after the 8th of December.
http://www.fulton-armory.com/tea/m1serial.htm0 -
Xracer thanks for that link showing all the ser.#'s.
STAY SAFE0 -
So is it possiable to find a DOM for Post-World War II garands? 0 -
Grips try "gunpartscorp" Garand info try "odcmp", "thegca.org" or "armscollectors". 0 -
Springfield Armory historical web site has a listing of dates of manugacture.
Emmett0 -
Dates of manufacture for postwar Garands, especially from
IHC, who was basically not very well organized, are around,
but they are not particularly reliable, since there was no
pressure to keep the same kinds of records. This is explained
in all the major works on the rifle. Indeed, I have seen
all original, untampered with, untouched rifles whose barrels
bore considerably later dates than what is show in the books.
One also has to remember, those are ONLY contract delivery dates,
and apply ONLY to receivers, the exceptions and footnote are probably MUCH more vital than the dates themselves. And moreover,
a lot of this date-chasing is ridiculous poppycock, anyway; and
this is particularly so with postwar rifles, made to higher
specifications, but not with the same urgency.0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
6 comments