Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

P90 Revisted II

Comments

4 comments

  • kingjoey
    That's the US Gov't you're talking about, right? I think we're the only ones that have that caliber of idiots on the payroll. Milspec XYZ says that it must be chrome-plated therefore...[;)]
    PS couldn't see a Ruger passing the trials though. Too many vulnerable spots for dirt to jam up the works.
    0
  • outdoortexas
    Like your post Drobs, and Joey has brought up something I've been curious about.
    I've expected my 95's and 97's to protect me and mine, but have never had them in the dirt and grime. What's the "experts" opinion on this? I've never seen a report.
    0
  • drobs
    Outdoor,
    I'll have to do a little more research on that one but I'm sure it's got to be out there in Google land somewhere. [:)]

    Regards,
    ************************
    Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some aquatic ceremony. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart throws a sword at you!
    0
  • cwinn
    Im looking at an artical from a 1998 issue of Combat Guns Annual, and it lists the canidates for military adoption at the time: Beretta 92, Sig p226, S&w 659, HK P7M13, and the Ruger P-85, so apparently it was in the trials.

    I spoke to a family friend and Ruger dealer earlier who said the p-85 was in fact turned down only becuase of the non-chromed barrel.

    dano, i guess i wasnt fair, my Beretta only jammed once, and that was with some reloads that jammed in my other 9 to. I like my Beretta also and would trust my life with it in a heartbeat just like my p90.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?