Sig Pro 2340 .40s&w
Anyone own a Sig Pro in .40? I have a P239 in 9mm that has been a great gun, I am looking at a Sig Pro but would like some feedback from some owners or gunsmiths ect.. Thanks for any info.
0
-
It is a good gun, very reliable and robustly constructed.
I like the 226 and 229 better. They have aluminum, not plastic frames and are easier to field strip and work on.
SIG pistol armorer/FFL Dealer/Full time Peace Officer, Moderator of General Discussion Board on Gunbroker. Visit www.gunbroker.com, the best gun auction site on the Net! Email davidnunn@texoma.net0 -
I own 8 other 40 S&W caliber pistols(Glock, S&W, Browning, Colt, Star, H&K, and Kel-Tec) and I believe that my Sig-Pro is probably the most accurate of the bunch. I have been very happy with mine. 0 -
I own a PRO in .357sig,it doesnt tame recoil like the P229 or the Glock 31.But it shoots well is very reliable.And I like the changeing backstraps.
Best!!!
Rugster
Toujours Pret0 -
I intended on buy a 2340 but after shooting it got a 229 instead. Like rugster said the recoil in the polymer frame is a good bit more. I shot the .40, but I'd hate to imagine the .357SIG. In a nutshell I love my 229 and now my 226 is very neglected because of it. A great and well balanced gun. Buy one, you won't be sorry.
-Marcus
****Happiness is a new gun.****0 -
Wouldn't take a polymer SIG over the metal ones. If you want polymer get a Glock.
Three Precious Metals: Gold, silver and lead0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
5 comments