A.R.M.S. or Springfield Mount?

ItGoBang

October 15, 2002 05:08

What one to get... A.R.M.S. or the Springfield, 3ed Gen. Scope mount??

It will hurt you, More than it will hurt me..

Life Member... N R A

Thanks for all the help!

0

• 

  cpermd

  October 15, 2002 06:08

  ARMS is much more stable and sturdy.
  There is a reason Uncle Sam uses the ARMS.
  cpermd

  0
• 

  drawn

  October 15, 2002 08:29

  Ditto on the swan!!
  
  "LIFE IS NOT A JOURNEY TO THE GRAVE WITH THE INTENTION OF ARIVING SAFELY IN ONE PRETTY AND WELL PRESERVED PIECE, BUT, TO SKID ACROSS THE LINE BROADSIDE, THOUGHRLY USED UP, WORN OUT, LEAKING OIL, SHOUTING GERONIMO!!"

  0
• 

  mark christian

  October 15, 2002 08:43

  I use the ARMS mount on my early NM M1A and prefer it to any other that I've seen. The quick detach rings are the easiset on and off and always hold their zero. The mount won't move and the iron sights are still useable...when I shoot a CMP match I never take the mount off.
  Just take your time with the installation and follow all of the instructions. The Springfield is okay but the ARMS is simply better.
  
  Mark T. Christian

  0
• 

  Spring Creek

  October 15, 2002 08:47

  I have found the ARMS mounts to be very reliable.
  I use them on HK's- 91's, 93's and 94's.

  0

Please sign in to leave a comment.