Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Curious at to reason for requirement.

Comments

7 comments

  • nelchris
    Hey,Everyone needs to have a signed copy of FFL.from the person who is to receive the gun .NO ANDS IFS OR BUTTS
    0
  • AntiqueDr
    Actually, that is not correct.

    The law is that the recipient must be a licensee. There is no requirement for a non-licensee to obtain a copy of the recipient's FFL, only to know that the recipient is a licensee. The reason a licensed dealer has to obtain a copy is because the dealer has to log the firearm out of his books to another licensee or to an individual on a Form 4473. Upon audit, each 4473 and FFL license must be on file. Since non-licensees do not the recordkeeping requirement, it is not legally necessary for a non-licensee to obtain the FFL copy.

    Now, if the only way you feel sure that your recipient is a licensee is to have an FFL copy that's fine - but it is your choice, not law.

    By the way, if you ship your firearm back to the manufacturer for repair are you going to require a copy of their FFL first?

    We buy, sell and trade quality guns and scopes!Master Dealer for Kimber, Wilson Combat and Dan Wesson.Visit our website at www.ApaxEnterprises.com
    0
  • Alpine
    AntiqueDr: That was the example I was going to use.

    So... answer me this. Why is it a Gunbroker.com requirement for their non FFL sellers to have a copy of reciever FFL?

    Again it is not the ATF requirement.

    "If you ain't got pictures, I wasn't there."
    0
  • AntiqueDr
    Probably just a CYA thing. I have no problem sending a copy to an individual who is sending me a gun, whether its a trade/purchase or repair. Sometimes it makes a big difference in their ability to ship, depending on the stupidity of their particular UPS or FedEx depot. It just slows things down, is all.

    We buy, sell and trade quality guns and scopes!Master Dealer for Kimber, Wilson Combat and Dan Wesson.Visit our website at www.ApaxEnterprises.com
    0
  • Nighthawk
    If it were the case it would be illegal to ship a firearm back to the factory,or to a Gun Smith for tweeking it up.The only requirment I am aware of is if you ship by mail the firearm cant be shipped in the same box as ammo.And of course it has to be unloaded,and you must write firearm inside.(by the way please dont steel me)I would suggest you get plenyy of insurance.The postal service tend to be more careful with Insured items.


    Best

    Rugster
    0
  • AntiqueDr
    Another myth that must be dispelled. You are not required to label the package as containing a firearm, and the carrier is prohibited from requiring that labeling under 18 USC 922:

    " No common or contract carrier shall require or cause any label, tag, or other written notice to be placed on the outside of any package, luggage, or other container that such package, luggage, or other container contains a firearm. "


    We buy, sell and trade quality guns and scopes!Master Dealer for Kimber, Wilson Combat and Dan Wesson.Visit our website at www.ApaxEnterprises.com
    0
  • Alpine
    I know for a fact that a non FFL holder does not have to have a copy, before sending, and that "firearm" cannot be on the outside of the
    package. Now I wish ADMIN would let me know why they require it for their sellers. It is not in the AFT regs.


    "If you ain't got pictures, I wasn't there."
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?