Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Pre-ban?? GLock?

Comments

7 comments

  • niklasal
    No such thing as pre-ban Glocks. There are only pre-ban magazines.

    ANY Glock 20 mag will fit ANY glock 20.

    My gun is prettier than yours, and it's a Glock!
    0
  • austin247
    What niklasal said.
    0
  • leeblackman
    What he said...

    The only difference I can think of between the older and newer glocks, (Not pre-post ban, no such thing) is that the new glocks have a rail on the dust guard for mounting a light or tactical accessorie, and the old "slick-grip" glocks dont.

    I've also seen some glocks that were "re-manufactured" where they have the new grip style, but not rail on the dust guard. But I don't know what the real story is behind their re-manufacture, thats just what the add said.

    If I'm wrong please correct me, I won't be offended.
    0
  • BayouCritter
    Glock refers to their guns as "generation." Right now I believe they are still on third generation. Some may disagree but I would prefer the most recent generation as the changes are more favorable to the shooter. Some of the preban magazines may be weaker than the present ones, as the newest magazine has been reinforced with a metal tube to prevent expansion from the pressure of a fully loaded mag. I forget the date this was done, but it was recently. I will check my manual at work today and report back if no one else does.
    0
  • Nighthawk
    The only thing different between an 80s glock and a brand new one is the equipment rails on the dust cover,and the finger grooves which In my oponion makes the 10mm more easily controlled under rapid fire. Its the magazines that have been changed, any preban HI Cap mag will work in a new Glock that came with 10 rd mags. By the way the 10mm is a good choice I have easily taken deer with mine at short range. The 10mm is very close to the .41 mag power wise.


    Good Luck.

    Rugster
    0
  • RSLINTII
    Dear Rugerster, I returned my G-17 (1989 model) about 10 years ago to have some parts replaced by Glock at no charge. This was to update to a safer accidental discharge mode. It was a factory done deal, they sent the original parts back. I think it was due to being more P/C than necessary, but the new ones have this upgrade now. Best, Robert

    "Endurance" Corrected to Glock, mistaken for when I replaced the safty action on my Ruger "old" .22 single action six.

    Edited by - RSLINTII on 05/18/2002 09:59:00
    0
  • leeblackman
    quote:
    Dear Rugerster, I returned my G-17 (1989 model) about 10 years ago to have some parts replaced by Ruger at no charge. This was to update to a safer accidental discharge mode. It was a factory done deal, they sent the original parts back. I think it was due to being more P/C than necessary, but the new ones have this upgrade now. Best, Robert

    "Endurance"


    Wow, I didn't know Ruger made Glock 17's...

    If I'm wrong please correct me, I won't be offended.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?