Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Short action or not?

Comments

5 comments

  • rsnyder55
    I use a 300 weatherby and have never really found a need to go to the the newer short action mags. The only advantage I can think of a shorter action is that the rifle is shorter and possibly faster followup shot working the short action.

    You may want to compare prices on the rifles and ammunition.
    0
  • MIKE WISKEY
    sounds like the gun shop over stocked on the .300 short mags., like rsynder said check the prices first. that 1/4" you save will be expensive.
    0
  • MaCT
    Thanks guys I appreciate it!! I'll look into that!
    If price won't be a factor what are the advantages\disadvantages of each? Any input on either would be greatly appreciated Thanks again![:D]

    Success is how high you bounce when you hit bottom.
    -General George Patton
    0
  • ern98
    Comparitive pricing is always good idea. As far as short mag verses longer mags my take on it is barrel length. There are lots of 300 Win mags out there with 24" barrels and that do not always get all they can out of their powder capacity. The new "short mags" are hyped that they get 95% of the long mags velosity with the 24" barrels. If you decide to go with the old, just as good, longer magums I would want to buy a rifle with a 26" barrel. Especially if it was to be a Weatherby. Other hype on the short mags is that the total package is more compact and nimble, like I said hype. If the critters you intend to hunt will be larger and such, I might think about the .338 Win Mag as it does work fine with a 24" barrel. The .338 Win Mag is plenty flexable, with the assortment of bullets available, to hunt anything from smaller deer to the larger bears. Welcome to the great outdoors.
    0
  • Colt Super
    I have not been able to see any advantage, at all, in the short magnums.

    God Bless America and...
    NEVER Forget WACO
    NEVER, EVER Forget 911
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity