Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Close Range Birdshot: Penetration Test

Comments

10 comments

  • trsmith5
    Sounds like some accurate results to me, and just think, with a double or pump, the first shell will definitly clear the path for the second.

    A GUN IN THE HAND IS BETTER THAN A COP ON THE PHONE.
    0
  • trsmith5
    Sounds like some accurate results to me, and just think, with a double or pump, the first shell will definitly clear the path for the second.

    A GUN IN THE HAND IS BETTER THAN A COP ON THE PHONE.
    0
  • trsmith5
    Sounds like some accurate results to me, and just think, with a double or pump, the first shell will definitly clear the path for the second.

    A GUN IN THE HAND IS BETTER THAN A COP ON THE PHONE.
    0
  • trsmith5
    I'm not sure what just happened with my pc, I guess it thought it was worth saying three times. sorry about that
    0
  • Shootist3006
    tr - you can go back and DELETE the extraq entries!

    Allen's test results were similar to tests I ran 10 years ago, however the results change dramatically when the range is extended to over 7 yards. My tests were using drywall with a penetration target on the far side of a double thickness of drywall (mounted on both sides of a 2X4 box) to guage danger to occupants on the other side of the wall. At 5 yards or less, severe damage to the other side target, 5 to 7 yards much less and over 7 yards only minor damage. I would have to find the tests for more precise data

    Quod principi placuit legis habet vigorem.Semper Fidelis
    0
  • allen griggs
    Shootist- I was wondering about drywall. The possibility that the birdshot would not penetrate drywall is the reason a person would use birdshot in the first place. What gauge gun and what # shot were you using, do you remember?
    0
  • Tailgunner1954
    Nice test, thanks for running it.

    One other thought, a standard 12ga skeet load (1 1/8oz 3dram #9 shot, 1200fps at the muzzle) even if it didn't penatrate the clothing would be fairly lethal, just due to the trauma of 500gr of lead impacting at 1100+fps.

    Some guys like a mag full of lead, I still prefer one round to the head.
    0
  • Robin
    I kinda started this when I volunteered that my preference for home self defense was my old 870 loaded with 7 1/2 high brass bird shot. It is what I use and I believe it is better than an AR-15 for many reasons, including the litigation that would most likely follow protecting yourself in your own home.

    I know first hand it is lethal. In 1969 my best friend was hit by an accidental discharge of a 20 gauge single barrel loaded with #8's from a distance of 20-25 feet. My good friend, Gary Brannon died that day on the way to the hospital.

    Worry is the interest humans pay on the debt of miscalculation.
    0
  • Chevyman Tx
    I believe that using a birdshot load would probably be a dam good in-house load. If it didnt kill them on the spot, they would bleed to death very rapidly. Would be about the same as putting a person in a meat grinder!

    Dustin K. Griffin
    0
  • select-fire
    Sounds like an pretty accurate test. However I will stick with my 12 gauge #4's to get the job done if the distance is greater.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?