Glock 22 vs. Sig 226

Eagle 5

October 13, 2004 13:42

Im looking to buy one or the other. Any outstanding good or bad things which would lead me to pick one over the other?

0

• 

  David Nunn

  October 13, 2004 14:08

  I haven't read of any SIGs blowing up in the shooter's hands, prompting the factory to quickly and quietly replace the gun.
  
  Both are good guns, but the SIG is more durable. My opinion.
  
  SIG pistol armorer/FFL Dealer/Full time Peace Officer, Moderator of General Discussion Board on Gunbroker. Visit www.gunbroker.com the best gun auction site on the Net! Email gpd035@sbcglobal.net

  0
• 

  MDBurns

  October 13, 2004 16:25

  Never had a Sig but carried a Glock 22 for a while and plan on getting another one. I tend to think of the Sig as a better quality weapon BUT I love the weight and design of the Glock. Considering getting a comp barrel, should be a nice improvement.

  0
• 

  yachtdave

  October 13, 2004 16:29

  have both, favor the sig
  
  Dave

  0
• 

  targetshooter

  October 13, 2004 18:26

  If you are going to shoot it in any competition, buy the glock.
  
  Down Zero

  0
• 

  grdad45

  October 13, 2004 18:29

  Had both, now have only the SIG. It is MUCH more accurate and the weight difference is not that bad.

  0
• 

  punchie

  October 13, 2004 18:34

  Toss a coin and then go with the one that just 'feels' right and points naturally.
  
  
  
  AN ARMED SOCIETY IS A POLITE SOCIETY

  0

Please sign in to leave a comment.