Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Fed. Ord M14

Comments

3 comments

  • 1KYDSTR
    I've heard some fairly ill reports concerning the quality of these guns but like all reports on less expensive guns, a degree of scepticism is likely in order! There were some problems with the heat treating and parts interchangeability was rumored to be a little touchy! If you aren't looking at paying too much for one though, I might think about picking one up and trying to have it re heat treated by a good smith! That being said, look at it in the area of common failure to see if it looks O.K. or not and proceed accordingly!

    "When I cease learning...I'm dead"(Me)
    "Power corrupts...Absolute power corrupts absolutely"(Descartes?)
    "History is written by winners"(Patton)
    "You get a lot farther with a kind word and a gun than you do with a kind word alone!"(Al Capone)
    "There is nothing lower than the human race...except the French" (Samuel Clemens)
    0
  • Grasshopper
    Gun Tests did a report on those some time back,, verdict """dont'buy. nambu
    0
  • nmyers
    I owned one (briefly), & it was the poorest quality gun I have ever owned. The receiver is soft, & the op rod will quickly gouge the metal in the receiver's op rod channel. The parts are crudely cast & WAY off milspec, & the stock looks like it was made in a middle school shop class.

    There is nothing good about this rifle, & no amount of gunsmithing can make it serviceable. Avoid at all cost.

    Neal
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity