Sig Sauer Comparisons
For all you Sig fans/owners out there, I am interested in buying a Sig as my new handgun purchase. I would like to know the difference between the Sig Pro series and the Classic full size models. How do they feel to you and which has the better preformance? I have not test fired any Sigs myself, but I do like the feel of the Pro models, just felt better in my hand. Do you have any information that would be useful in my decision. Thanks.
"You cannot conquer America." -William Pitt, 1777
"You cannot conquer America." -William Pitt, 1777
0
-
I have had several Sigs over the years and have some now. They have always been completely reliable, accurate and trouble free.However I have never had a Pro series. I shot with a man who had just purchased
a Pro model and had nothing but trouble with it. The 2 mags he had actually fell apart and the gun would not chamber a variety of ammo.
Now this was a few years ago and it may have been just that gun.I know he sold it immediately after that.Perhaps other GB members have experiences that they can relate to you. Good luck.0 -
have the p226 in .40sw..love the feel and the full size frame the weight factor really dosent concern me at all and i carry it as a duty gun and concealed off duty...when i un hoslter it and bring it up the sight's balance with the weight of it and the are always right wear i need them...no over draw or under draw ...nice to shoot...double action on first shot..no il effect to me on target placement.... real nice gun...bit pricey..but you get what you pay for.
it is good that we meet in the struggle of life or death.. .....it shall be life!0 -
Look at the SIG P-232 380, nice pistol; fits good in the hand; accurate; and easy to maintain.[8D]
It must be right, or we wouldn't do it this way!0 -
One problem with SIGPro pistols is that they're not very field repair friendly. There are only a couple of parts that can be replaced, even by a certified armorer, without having to send it back to the factory. 0 -
I currently own 3 Sigs, a 226 in 40, a 239 in 40 also, and a 220 in 45. None of them were cheap, but I guarantee you will quickly forget about the costs for they are quality pistols and will give a lifetime of enjoyment. Dandy 0 -
Thanks Gentlemen. It sounds like the Sig Pro series is perhaps a little sub par. I will look into the other sig pistols and find one to fit the bill.
"You cannot conquer America." -William Pitt, 17770 -
I own a 226, 220, and a 40 S&W Pro. I like them all. The Pro is the most accurate of my double action 40S&W. I have H&K, Glock, Star, S&W, Beretta, and Taurus. It will shoot more accurately than any of these. I have not had any problems with it and i bought it used. 0 -
Have a go with a 2340 in 357Sig; you'll like the controllability, point of aim & handling characteristics.
I've had a SP2340 (originally 40S&W, couldn't resist, and bought the other barrel)in 357Sig for almost 6 years now, (I think, could've been longer) and I liked it so much for targets, plinkin' and general shooting that I even shot a Big Bore silhouette match with it and scored a 28! Those chickens were unforgiving!
If you liked the feel of the Pro model, was it the cobblestone or the smooth rubber grip?
As to the availability of parts and repairs that gun owners in general are capable of; there's almost nothing that can go wrong with this gun (magazine fell apart?!- did he "clean/disassemble" it prior to the malfunction?) that you would want to try to fix yourself. They are reliable, accurate firearms from one of the foremost makers in the world; if it does ever misstep, you should send it to SigArms for repair.
Oh yeah, I only paid $400 for mine, the extra barrel was $85, Extra mags (interchangeable-use for both calibers)from the factory were $26 and made in Italy.
If you know it all; you must have been listening.<br>WEAR EAR PROTECTION!0 -
Originally I choked when I realized how much money I plopped down for my Sig 229 in .40. But after shooting for a while I can say it has functioned flawlessly with any ammo I have used. Every pistol I have jams once in a while. Not this gun. And, if you are not mechanically inclined, you won't find an easier pistol to field strip, clean, and put back together. The fit, finish, and balance are perfect on my pistol. I am a scrounger for a cheaper gun like anyone else. But, if you can swing the extra money, I think you'll be glad you did in the long wrong. They hold their value and don't let you down.
P.S. I held a 232 in 380 the other day. The fit, finish, and balance were just as good as their larger pistols.0 -
Thanks for all the info. It could be that the Pro series at its inception had some flaws, but everything I've read so far, it is either love or hate, because it has a different feel from other sigs or they are reluctant of any changes in a brand. I will have to base my decision on some different points of view and I appreciate all the input. It will definetly be a Sig!
"You cannot conquer America." -William Pitt, 17770 -
I test drove a Sig 220 for a couple of months before selling it to a good friend. Nice gun, but being a lefty, I couldn't get over the fact that it ejected shell casings right into my forehead. I'm sure a gunsmith could've fixed that but just didn't seem right to modify a Sig. My friend, a righty, is greatly enjoying it. Plus I gave him the same deal I got on it. $500.
Edit: I should add, see if you can't rent a couple different models at a range and find out which one fits you best. My shop, for instance, will let you testfire used guns on our range. I bet this is standard practice most places as a selling tool.
Regards,
0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
11 comments