.338-06 -vs- .35 Whelan
I have a Remington 700 .270 I am thinking of rebarrleing it and I am undicided on which way to go, Any advice pro's or con's
Thanks
BOWWMAN
Thanks
BOWWMAN
0
-
I picked the 338-06 for an Elk rifle. With the 210 to 225 gr. bullets muzzle velocity is around 2700 fps. It will shoot pretty flat out to 300 yds. If I were hunting animals at closer ranges I would probably go with the 35 Whelen. Both are very similar power wise. 0 -
I have used the whelen for years. 200 gr. barnes X loaded to 2975 average. This best elk rifle I have used. Each caliber is good, and the animal can't tell the difference. 0 -
The 338-06 (formerly known as the .333 OKH) is a pretty nice cartridge with lots of possibilities. As said, the animal won't know the difference between the 338-06 and the .35 Whelen.
Both cartridges are available commercially, but only Weatherby is loading the 338-06, I believe (c'mon guys, prove me wrong!)
A very interesting cartridge is the .35 Whelen Ackley Improved. A real powerhouse.
Keep off the Ridgeline0 -
A-Square Ammunition is loaded with the following weights and styles of bullets:
.338-06/ 200 NOS B-TIP
.338-06/ 250 NOS PAR
.338-06/ 250 D-T
http://members.aol.com/riflemenky/Ammunition.html0 -
Its a close call there not to much differance one a little more diameter the other a little sectional denisity. Do you handload ? that may be the biggest factor for you.
psalms 160 -
I forgot to write that I chose the 35 over the 338 (1) It is a factory cartridge. (at that time) (2) The availability of cast bullets (357 etc) When loaded with a small charge of pistol powder the point of aim can be regulated to 50 yds. Works great for small game. Just my 2 cents worth. 0 -
Word of caution here! Light loads of fast powder in large case may be receipe for disaster. Ask the SASS and NCOWS people. 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
7 comments