Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

S&W Model 60 or Ruger 101

Comments

13 comments

  • duckhunter
    Ruger always.

    I WOULD RATHER BE DUCK HUNTING.
    0
  • CFPython
    The Ruger is built like a tank. Mine has a real nice double action trigger. Another vote for the SP101.

    "Does this mean Ann Margaret's NOT coming?"
    0
  • Bittersweat
    I'll have to agree with Python. My SP101 is also a built like a tank.
    The stainless finish does not show ANY WEAR even with years of intermittant carry in a variety of holsters. It is comfortable to shoot even with .357 mag 125 gr. hollowpoints. What more could I ask from a carry gun ?
    0
  • Henry0Reilly
    Ruger makes a fine product, I prefer the Smith. If possible, shoot one of each and see which suits you better.

    In a snubby you aren't getting that much more performance out of the .357 than you would a .38. You might want to consider a S&W model 36.

    avitar.jpg
    Semper Fi

    Remember Ruby Ridge.

    What if there were no hypothetical questions?

    Not a member at the auction? Join Gunbroker at this link!
    0
  • torquimata
    I tried both and bought the 60, liked the trigger better.
    0
  • ATF
    I could have bought either one ,my choice below.

    standard.jpg

    Eagle_Guns.gif
    standard.jpg
    standard.jpg
    When a worm wants to relax,does he go fishing?  "And remember a wet dog doesn't fly at night"  "My memory's not as sharp as it used to be. Also, my memory's not as sharp as it used to be."   ATF,Eagle Guns
    0
  • glabray
    I've heard a lot of the "built like a tank" description of the SP101. However, after owning one for awhile, I'd suggest a potential buyer consider the relative flimsy cylinder attachment when the cylinder is open. If the gun isn't to be carried much or live in a drawer it's okay but it you want to depend on it after being knocked around there are better choices.
    0
  • bigride203
    I would go with the best trigger. No sense buying a pistol built like a tank if the trigger isn't smooth. Give them a side by side trigger test and see if you discern a difference. Pick the one that fits you and is comfortable. I can't say that either would be a "wrong" choice but I am partial to Smith & Wesson.

    You dudes get lost now, ya hear!
    0
  • beantownshootah
    "Built like a tank" is good, but are you really going to push this gun to its limit with so many full-power .357 magnum rounds that the extra strength is going to matter? I can't deny its possible, but I've never heard of someone shooting their Smith to the point where it failed!

    Smith 60 weighs 21.5 ounces in the 2-1/8" inch barrel, 6-9/16" length.

    Ruger SP101 weights 25 ounces in the 2-1/4" inch barrel, 7-1/8" inch length.

    So the 60 is a bit lighter, a bit more compact, and likely has a better trigger (particularly single action). They are fairly comparable, but for CCW purposes, I'd give a slight edge to the Smith.
    0
  • Ray Boone
    Unless they've changed things, the Smith 60 was the Chief Special, strictly 38 Spl. It was 5 shot and was really tiny. Back when I carried a sidearm for work I had two that got most of the use; a model 60 stainless 38 Spl, 2", round grip and a model 66 2 1/2" stainless 357 round grip. the 66 was considerably heavier, but it was a much more useable gun. It had adjustable sights, a leaf spring on the hammer, and from my point of view was a much better gun. I kept the 66 for years while the 60 was traded for a pre-64 model 70 featherweight 30-06, which I still have.
    0
  • Henry0Reilly
    quote:Originally posted by Ray B
    Unless they've changed things, the Smith 60 was the Chief Special, strictly 38 Spl. It was 5 shot and was really tiny. Back when I carried a sidearm for work I had two that got most of the use; a model 60 stainless 38 Spl, 2", round grip and a model 66 2 1/2" stainless 357 round grip. the 66 was considerably heavier, but it was a much more useable gun. It had adjustable sights, a leaf spring on the hammer, and from my point of view was a much better gun. I kept the 66 for years while the 60 was traded for a pre-64 model 70 featherweight 30-06, which I still have.


    Yes, they did change things. The model 60 is now a .357 Magnum.

    avitar.jpg
    Semper Fi

    Remember Ruby Ridge.

    What if there were no hypothetical questions?

    Not a member at the auction? Join Gunbroker at this link!
    0
  • targetshooter
    Both are very good guns, but the S&W 60 is lighter to carry and has a slightly shorter trigger reset. On the other hand because of the weight the Ruger SP 101 is much more comfortable to shoot heavy loads out of. Note: If you are going to shoot 357 magnums out of them don't use anything heavier then a 125 gr. bullet. The 158's are brutal.

    Down Zero
    0
  • Grasshopper
    Ruger,,,,because of all the above...nambu
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity