Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Frogbert, SKS Info on Conversions to US Made

Comments

4 comments

  • Frogbert
    Thanks, boeboe, for your terrific post. Too bad our lawmakers can't word things so clearly and to the point.
    Personally, I think the modification of the SKS is more trouble than it's worth. One should just spend that time making a little extra money and then buy a good quality AK, already configured legally, like my SLR. The SKS rifles I have now are unaltered, excellent and have matching serial numbers. One of the requirements for staying free and well armed, is to respect the law. I do, I will, and I shall.

    See you, in this manner of speaking, later.

    Frog.[^]

    RRiBBButt...
    0
  • drobs
    Send an Email to Kimber Kid, he built one up 922r legal.

    Regards,
    gadsden.jpg
    0
  • TWalker
    To use detachable magazines with an SKS does NOT require adding US parts. The requirements are: No bayonet and remove bayonet lug; Do not have other "evil" features such as grenade launcher, flash hider, or protruding pistol grip stock, i.e. (AK) style. That's it.
    To attach a folding stock to an SKS that did not come with one does require adding US parts. People have been legally using detachable SKS mags for years by simply grinding off the bayonet lug and using the original stock. The assault weapon ban that recently expired didn't change anything as far as SKS's go. The bans and restrictions on them now are still the same as before.
    0
  • boeboe
    Yes, that is correct, you could remove the bayonet lug and retain the original stock, but Frogbert's original question was about the legality of one that already had the folding stock installed.

    GBLogo-170x60.gif


    MEMBER SINCE 10/24/1999.

    To err is human, to moo is bovine.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity