Burris Fullfield II
who has one? any good? Thanks all.
0
-
Decent scopes, but by no means a match for the Signature. If it were me, I would and did save my nickels for a Signature, I have three of those. 0 -
Awewsome for the price ... because you're not paying for a Signature series. Mine is crystal clear and it's the first good scope I've ever had. Ballistic plex reticle, silver finish, 3x9 for $200 ..... with a spotting scope to boot. The spotting scope is average in my opinion. Perfect for 100 yards as long as you use lighter colored targets or the Birchwood-Casey ones. Either way I wouldn't hesitate to buy another Fullfield. 0 -
A really good scope for the money. For arounf $200 they are hard to bgeat. There warranty service is really good also; I have had experience with that.
J. Patrick Tatum0 -
Burris has the least returns, or problems with the Fullfield 11 scopes, and that would include the Signature Series scopes.
The glass is better in the Signature scopes, but unless you have looked through a lot of high dollar scopes I doubt you could tell a difference.
Go for it unless you just have to have the very best.
Gun control is hitting what your aiming at.0 -
I HAVE A BURRIS FULLFIELD II ON A SAVAGE HEAVY BARREL .308. I SHOOT SODA CANS AT 1000 YARDS WITH NO PROBLEM. EXCELLENT CLARITY AND CONSTANT ZERO. GREAT CHOICE FOR LOW BUCK INVESTMENT. GO FOR IT. 0 -
I have a fullfield II in a 3x9-40 and the clarity was better than I expected. It is not a Great scope but it is very good for the money. The construction and euro design I really like so I have it on a meat gun (.243) I have a Burris Signature and a Burris Black Diamond for my good rifles and the improved quality is quite noticable.
Mad Dog0 -
Their products are superb for the price. You will quite often run into the "Leupold is the best of everything" crowd,..but those folks are simply inexperienced or misinformed. I looked through my pards 4-16x44 signature some years back and that was the day my vari-x III 4.5-14x50 was put up for sale and replaced by the same scope. I find their light transmission to be far better than their price tag dictates.
as far as soda cans at 1000yds,..that I would have to see to beleive, even with a Nightforce NXS or US Optics.[:X]
why chase the game when the bullet can get em from here?....
Got Balistics?0 -
Look into the Nikon Prostaff as well.. they only go for about $150, but they have some real clear bright glass for the money.
"I will no longer debate a liberal because I feel they are beneath contempt. Just communicating with one contaminates a person." - whiteclouder0 -
I'll add another vote for the Fullfield II. I have converted several leupold fans with this entry level scope. 0 -
I have one in the 4x14x42 power...Awesome scope for the money. I got mine off fleabay for $250 + shipping.
A dead intruder cannot testify against you in a court of law!
Never argue with an idiot...They will drag you down to their level then beat you with experience!0 -
I picked up one of the 3x9x40 fullfield II w spotting scope packages for about $200. The spotting scope wasn't what I'd hoped for but I was able to sell it off on GB for about $50, which made the price on the scope really good. The ballistic plex is a great sighting device if you are looking for longer ranges or varmint shooting. My only knock on it is that it is heavier and bulkier then say a 3x3x40 Vari II Leupold, a scope I also really like. But unless I wanted to scope some really petite or gracefull ultra light rifle the fullfield II is a fine choice. 0 -
Try a sightron scope instead.
Brighter and easier to sight in
due to acu-trac.0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
12 comments