Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

.22 Auto

Comments

13 comments

  • nmyers
    Well, at least all those he is looking at are quality guns. Is he just looking for a plinker, as opposed to a target gun? And, is he big enough to handle a heavy gun? Must admit, I'm perplexed about his aversion to a round barrel.

    I like the variety & options that Ruger offers, plus they are built like a tank. If he wants a light gun with an easy slide, I'd look at a used S&W like the 622, 422, etc.

    But, the bottom line is, it boils down to personal choice.

    Neal
    0
  • perry shooter
    Hello Nord I would suggest a Browning Buckmark or older not current made High Standard. .Both of these will serve him well and easy to clean and SWAP barrels to what ever you want. The Ruger is a good pistol but can be a PITA to take down to clean. and you have to buy a complete top end if you want a different type/length barrel. The grip angle of the Ruger.is different then most larger caliber pistols so it will IMHO be harder to transfer skills learned on the 22 pistol if and when he wants a larger center-fire pistol.
    0
  • Gashauler
    How old, large is your son? I know Ruger made/makes their Mark III with a seven inch slab side barrel. Friend of mine has one and likes it, hope this helps.
    0
  • He Dog
    Another vote for Buckmark, with a variety of "models" or configuration, he can certainly find one without a round barrel 5" or longer. I have two and like them a lot.

    My vote for an older .22 semi auto would be the Colt Woodsman (mine are all Huntsman), but those have round barrels.
    0
  • bpost
    Hi Nord; agreeing with the others on the Buckmark. Mine has over 20,000 rounds through it with no problems. It is extremely accurate with top grade ammo. I would not hesitate to shoot it in a NRA bullseye pistol match.
    0
  • nord
    Many thanks for your replies... I guess at 38 he isn't a baby anymore.[;)]
    0
  • Robin
    Hello Nord,
    All of the ones mentioned are good options. I like the Ruger Mark II. Yes it can be a PITA to disassemble, but how often is that really necessary? I had a Ruger Standard pistol for years. I took it in for a complete cleaning a couple of years ago. When I went to pick it up the gunsmith told me he could solve a Rubic's cube quicker than assembling the pistol.[:)]
    0
  • tsr1965
    Hi nord,

    I will mimmic the others with the Browning Buck Mark. I have had nothing but good luck with them. If you are able to find an older standard onw with the 6 inch slab sidded barrel, or if you look on the auction side, you can even find an NRA Endowment one that comes with two barrels....in stainless and its fancy too! Imagine that fancy and good shooter.

    I will take the Time to endorse a S&W 41 if he can find one in his budget range, and the Rugers are not that much of a problem if you take them down and re-assemble about 20 times, you will get the hang of it. The high standards, even the entry level Dura-Matic M-101, are good shooters.

    If you tale a look at the auction side, and do a search under pistols for "22 auto", you will be amazed.

    Best
    0
  • Frontiersman101
    If he wants one new I would get a 1911 with a .22 conversion. But that can get a bit pricy. For used, my favorite .22 pistoles ever were made by Hi Standard. When they were made in america. They are no longer makeing them, but they were made very well. I wouldn't get the military one though. Here is a pic of mine.

    [img][/img]023-1.jpg
    0
  • xstuntman
    I love the Beretta Neos. Add red dot and have a ball[;)] X
    0
  • MemphisJim1
    I would disagree with those who say the Ruger Mark-Series pistols are a PITA to disassemble. It's reassembly that's the bit*h.
    0
  • gary wray
    Nord...forty + years ago I was going through the same decision process...what .22 to get. Learning early that, as you mention, quality always is the best, I settled on a Browning Medalist (pricey even then at $400 + a Beretta .25 on trade) but after thousands of rounds, it still is the tackdriver. And it is IMHO, the best looking .22 ever made. From time to time they come up on the auction side at @ 1k with case, barrel weights, tool, and original inst guide. I would also agree with the suggestions for High Standard (the older ones, not the "new" junk) in just about any configuration. I also shoot three older Smith 41's and they are super. Can also recommend the little stainless Colt .22 that came out several years ago but made no more. Have four of them with different barrel lengths and they are inexpensive and great to shoot. Don't know much about the newer .22's but I defer to the other experts on their experience. I just know that if I had it to do all over again, I would seek out a Medalist, shoot it for twenty years and know that if I wanted to sell it, I could always get my $ out of it, and have shot it for free! Check it out. Good shooting!
    0
  • Mark G
    I have a Buckmark and a Walther P22. Either will make a good target pistol.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity