Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

SMLE No 4 Mk II

Comments

7 comments

  • TWalker
    I've had good luck with the S&K mount. It looks good and is very solid, IMO.
    0
  • john w
    quote:Originally posted by TWalker
    I've had good luck with the S&K mount. It looks good and is very solid, IMO.


    X2 on the SK mount. I have one on my #4 and the only thing i did to make it better was use a thin piece of brass shim stock to make the wedge grab tighter. The mount will NOT move around or damage the gun in any way.
    0
  • dfletcher
    quote:Originally posted by john w
    quote:Originally posted by TWalker
    I've had good luck with the S&K mount. It looks good and is very solid, IMO.


    X2 on the SK mount. I have one on my #4 and the only thing i did to make it better was use a thin piece of brass shim stock to make the wedge grab tighter. The mount will NOT move around or damage the gun in any way.


    Can you give me more info on the wedge & shim? Reason I ask is that I have their similar mount on an SMLE Mk III and then damn thing won't stay put. Are you saying there's a nut that is drawn tight from the top against the stripper clip charger bridge on the No 4?
    0
  • TWalker
    The No. 4 mount is much better than the one for the MKIII. It does have a contoured nut that fits under the bridge as you described. I believe I bought mine from J&G Sales for about $40 a few years ago. S&K has a web site and list the base for about $60.
    SK002.jpg
    SK005.jpg
    0
  • dfletcher
    Thanks for the photo - that lug is the part that caused me problems on the MkIII.
    0
  • TWalker
    I have had two No. 4's with this mount. I never had a problem with either one. The one in the picture has had about 500 rounds fired through it and the mount is still tight.
    0
  • john w
    Yes that is the mount i have. The little brass shim i used is because the wedge seemed to pull up to far and was not tight enough for my liking.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity