Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Ruger M77 MkII in 264 Win. Magnum ??

Comments

5 comments

  • 22hipower
    Does the one you saw have a muzzlebrake? See http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=1273657 for some info on one that might be a match for the one you saw. I've not used one in 264 but have had a couple (although not the 1 of 1000 variety) and one of them, in 280 Rem, was incredibly accurate. I've had mediocre accuracy results with Ruger 77s but that 280 would shoot reliably into less than an inch at 100. $500 for NIB sounds very reasonable especially if it has a muzzlebrake.
    0
  • TWalker
    No muzzlebrake, but otherwise identical. I don't like brakes so that's a plus for me. Thanks for your reply.
    0
  • CapnMidnight
    I've been a 264 fan for years, and have found you need a 26" barrel to realy get the goody out of this caliber. Winchester put a 26" tube on thier model 70s for this reason. If the Ruger has this feature I'd buy it, sounds like a deal. I've always had best results with 140gr bullets, especialy Nosler and Sierra.
    For what it's worth.
    W.D.
    0
  • MFI
    As I remember its a distributor exclusive from Ruger .. They do these for Davidson's, Ellett sometimes.. Do you mean the old cut out black synthetic stock ruger used to have ? If so $500 is fair , its not a steal but fair..
    0
  • TWalker
    Yes, MFI, the stock is the one you described. I have a few Rugers with that style stock, now. I hated them at first, but they kind of grow on you. I agree with the preference for a 26 inch barrel in high velocity rifles. It does make a difference. I am still undecided on buying this Ruger. I wish someone would buy it so I don't have to think about it any more.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity