Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

k98 expert question

Comments

6 comments

  • p3skyking
    I've seen it before where the barrel serno was the only number present, but this was on a '45 model. Mauserwerk was still producing good in '44. Have you checked below the woodline for the serno?
    It is possible a rejected for cause receiver in '44, used anyway in '45 was used, but this would mean some acceptance proofs would NOT be present. You need to check for this.
    0
  • redman.com1
    no number anywhere. its a great condition gun and a great and safe shooter. cant see it being any type of a rejected receiver! thanks
    0
  • b0400879
    Redman,
    Sounds interesting.
    Per above, check under the woodline or else clean thoroughly. There HAS to be a s/n somewhere on an unaltered byf 44 receiver. The only genuine/noted cases of unserialed K98k receivers were found on late-war Gustloff's (coded bcd 4, 44, or perhaps 45 - & these are from a completely different armory).

    Pls put-up some pics.
    En alli hay MUCHOS mas een-fo para el K98k Aleman ......
    0
  • redman.com1
    ok, like i said ,no number. just did a tripple check. bottom of receiver, where it is flat, between what i call the recoil lug and opening where the follower is located is ff. that is all? what you think? thanks
    0
  • redman.com1
    on the mauser forum, i was told it was totally ligit and commom to see on a byf 44 to see # on barrel only.
    0
  • b0400879
    Not on a wartime '44 Oberndorf w/ Nazi firing proof, so gotta suspect that it was scrubbed. Just wonder which forum ya got that info from ..... the argument might actually fly if it's post-war Czech finished/reworked.

    Speakin' of 4'ems, try Tuco's & put-up some pics
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity