Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

WW 2 rifile

Comments

9 comments

  • Fatstrat
    Sounds like a Japanese type 99 Arisaka in 7.7 Jap caliber. Toyo Kogyo Arsenal, Series #32.Would need good pics of markings to be sure. ESPECIALLY the ones before & after the serial number. All numbers should match the last 3 of serial on receiver. Check for number on bottom of bolt handle as well. Looking forward to helping more after pics.
    0
  • Stevan1
    This link should help you identify even more than you may wish to know about an Arisaka Rifle.

    www.radix.net/~bbrown/japanese_markings.html

    This can even date and tell you what year of mfg as well as lot number. One of the best!!

    By the way, for those of you whom may have a Japanese bayonet or a rifle, this link can give you the complete history of Japanese bayonets as well as a rifle.

    Good Luck in identification!
    0
  • partisan
    +1 for the Arisaka 99. My Father was in the 6th Marines that landed on Okinawa. He was 17 years old, and thankfully he made it home with just minor shrapranel wounds.
    0
  • v35
    Not a Jap firearms expert but the face the chrysanthemum flower on the receiver bridge wasn't defaced or ground off makes the rifle more valuable.
    0
  • 45er
    Irishkid, You've given good descriptive info, (with great history!), and responces have been right on target.

    Those fold up wings on the sight are a basic clue to it being a Japanese Arisaka Type 99. Which it probably is, as Stevan1 points out. This sight is for lead-shooting at low-flying aircraft. No idea how effective they were, but interesting, to say the least. Monopods were also used, as well as a bolt cover.

    Short rifle, long rifle, sniper, as well as a take-down model were the variations produced. Search around or give photos/more diminsions here to find which you have. Short rifle is most common. Internal magazine you asked about held 5 rimless cartridges fed through stripper clips, or singles by hand. 7.7x58mm Arisaka is the correct round, as their is also a semi-rimmed 7.7 machinegun which is not correct. The 7.7 rifle cartridge is close in power to the 30-06, and using close to, I believe, the same bullet weight and diameter as the .303 British round. It did the job intended for.

    Radix is top notch, yet does not have rifle photos, (it does have pics of bayonets). Here's a web-site with photos:
    > http://riceone1.com/id21.html <
    which may show you which Type-99 version you have? And of course you can use google & google images, even wikipedia to find out more. You have enough info now to be merry on your way using the web... "Arisaka Type 99".

    Th "flower" you mentioned is indeed that, being the Imperial Japanese chrysanthemum crest, "mum" for short. Many, (most), were defaced upon surrender of WW 2 Japan as a face-saving gesture for the Emperor. This marring, often done with a file, was from barely noticable scratches to total obscurring of the mum. Battlefield pic-ups, as your's sounds like, will have the mum intack, and are usually of more $$$ value. Oh, are official "bring-back" papers with the rifle? Real good, if so.

    To end, not sure what you may find out from a gunsmith unless you do wish to shoot it, which equates into dollars to have it safety checked, (head-space being common). But most would be happy just to see and shoot the breeze about it. This latter, of course, should be free-of-charge, hah. Too, any gun shop can be a good place to find more info. If anything, proper preservation is now the key to this keepsake. A good gun oil, (I like Rem-oil), on all metal, and a pure wax for the stock will help. Keep it original, whatever you do, (meaning no stock-stripping, re-bluing, etc.) Lastly, myself having family militaria from the Civil War, sadly some with without much info about, do keep a good written record on all you know now and what you will find out about this treasure, so it all can be passed down the family line.
    Best,
    45er
    0
  • Fatstrat
    quote:Originally posted by v35
    Not a Jap firearms expert but the face the chrysanthemum flower on the receiver bridge wasn't defaced or ground off makes the rifle more valuable.

    ONLY if the numbers match. A mis-match, with or without MUM, commands the lowest value. IE: A ground MUM w/matching numbers is more desirable/valueable than a intact MUM mismatch.
    0
  • Stevan1
    quote:Originally posted by 45er
    Irishkid, You've given good descriptive info, (with great history!), and responces have been right on target.

    Those fold up wings on the sight are a basic clue to it being a Japanese Arisaka Type 99. Which it probably is, as Stevan1 points out. This sight is for lead-shooting at low-flying aircraft. No idea how effective they were, but interesting, to say the least. Monopods were also used, as well as a bolt cover.

    Short rifle, long rifle, sniper, as well as a take-down model were the variations produced. Search around or give photos/more diminsions here to find which you have. Short rifle is most common. Internal magazine you asked about held 5 rimless cartridges fed through stripper clips, or singles by hand. 7.7x58mm Arisaka is the correct round, as their is also a semi-rimmed 7.7 machinegun which is not correct. The 7.7 rifle cartridge is close in power to the 30-06, and using close to, I believe, the same bullet weight and diameter as the .303 British round. It did the job intended for.

    Radix is top notch, yet does not have rifle photos, (it does have pics of bayonets). Here's a web-site with photos:
    > http://riceone1.com/id21.html <
    which may show you which Type-99 version you have? And of course you can use google & google images, even wikipedia to find out more. You have enough info now to be merry on your way using the web... "Arisaka Type 99".

    Th "flower" you mentioned is indeed that, being the Imperial Japanese chrysanthemum crest, "mum" for short. Many, (most), were defaced upon surrender of WW 2 Japan as a face-saving gesture for the Emperor. This marring, often done with a file, was from barely noticable scratches to total obscurring of the mum. Battlefield pic-ups, as your's sounds like, will have the mum intack, and are usually of more $$$ value. Oh, are official "bring-back" papers with the rifle? Real good, if so.

    To end, not sure what you may find out from a gunsmith unless you do wish to shoot it, which equates into dollars to have it safety checked, (head-space being common). But most would be happy just to see and shoot the breeze about it. This latter, of course, should be free-of-charge, hah. Too, any gun shop can be a good place to find more info. If anything, proper preservation is now the key to this keepsake. A good gun oil, (I like Rem-oil), on all metal, and a pure wax for the stock will help. Keep it original, whatever you do, (meaning no stock-stripping, re-bluing, etc.) Lastly, myself having family militaria from the Civil War, sadly some with without much info about, do keep a good written record on all you know now and what you will find out about this treasure, so it all can be passed down the family line.
    Best,
    45er

    I kinda thought that my Radix link might be useful to some here on this forum. It really pinpoints which lot, arsenal, and what each symbol means and represents. Best ID papers I have ever found for Japanese rifles.
    0
  • 45er
    Howdy Stevan1, by all means I agree. Please excuse my imperfect written wording about Radix not having photos... was meant not to down-play the truly high value of that site, if this is what you perhaps are referring to?

    To assist Kidthatsirish's inquiry is why I included other places merely to specifically look for photos to aid in the basic ID'ing of the Arisaka's. I admired the time and enthusiasm he took to write out a very well description, so figurered he deserves an in-depth reply from as many as possible.

    Anyways, my main purose here is to both help and to learn, and am not percfect. So well, shucks... no one bats 1,000 here or anywhere, and I'll be the first to admit that, especially with my hunt&peck fingers and dwindling brain cell capablities. Have observed too many who believe their knowledge is so vast that they become beyond learning or teachable. Sad thing, that. (not here, of course, ahem).

    Anyways, I'll quit now, before this gets bounced over to and lost in the General Discussion forum. (I've yet to figure out the nuances of this place, ha). Yet, I think you desereved a reply, Stevan1, on this matter.
    Cheers!
    45er
    0
  • redman.com1
    rather have a mismatch with mum any day!
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity