Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

DYNAMITE BULLET?

Comments

10 comments

  • beantownshootah
    Historically speaking, explosive bullets have been manufactured and do exist, eg:

    http://www.lonesentry.com/articles/jp-explosive-bullets/index.html

    I see no reason *in theory* why you couldn't manufacture one filled with dynamite (as opposed to some other explosive, for example), and given the history of pyromaniacs and gun nuts, you have to figure at some point *somebody* tried this.

    Still, there are numerous practical problems here.

    First of all, you can't squeeze much explosive in the typical pistol or rifle bullet.

    Getting the thing to actually blow up on impact would probably require its own primer/detonator stuck in the explosive cavity as well, and that presents all sorts of safety issues with these sorts of rounds in storage and transport.

    Lastly, I'd imagine the manufacture of such rounds is illegal, given laws against destructive devices and such. (Though that's not going to stop some people).
    0
  • Laredo Lefty
    Years ago I tested exploding handgun ammo for my department, not for duty ammo but for ofcr education. If I recall they were made by "Velet".

    These rounds had a hollow point bullet with an enlarged cavity filled with probably gunpowder and capped with a primer, then sealed on the tip.

    They would pretty reliably POP on hard metal targets but not on soft.
    0
  • aap2
    As Beantown states, explosive bullets are nothing new. I remember buying WW2 surplus 8mm explosive tip rounds that made a bright blue flash when they hit, I have seen 50 cal explosive bullets that were used as spotting rounds; historically Jacob Snider had a muzzle-loading rifle designed to shoot explosive bullets for blowing up ammo wagons back during the Civil War. I think that the explosive was mercury fulminate. I would not want to ram one of those down a fouled bore....
    0
  • glabray
    When using dynamite to blow a ditch, only the first stick has a cap. The others go off from the concussion of the one a few feet away. With a bullet's impact there certainly would be enough concussion but the force of the bullet's impact might disperse the dynamite before it has a chance to go off. Let us know if it works!
    0
  • Txs
    This seems good in theory, but for a couple of reasons doesn't work well in the real world.

    It's not as if you could transform a bullet into a grenade by filling it's hollowpoint with explosive. A small arms bullet would only be capable of holding a tiny amount of explosive.

    Bullets with such a small charge that's designed to detonate on impact result in shallow wounds and are actually less effective than one of standard construction.

    'Exploding bullets' of different types have been around for many years but for the reasons stated remain the stuff of armchair commandos.
    0
  • quickmajik
    Considering old dynomite was either nitro and clay or nitro and saw dust, to me atleast it would seem the sudden shock of going from static to 1100 or more fps would blow the the nitro in the bullets cavity before it left the guns barrel.
    0
  • 11b6r
    As the folks have said- fantasy. There HAVE been several designs of exploders- Civil war used at least 2 different designs intended to be fired at artillery ammunition limbers- one had a short fuse the ignited when round fired, other had a 22 short blank inserted into the nose. Both had charge of black powder in a sizable cavity.

    The old style "straight" dynamites were nitroglycerin mixed with kieselgehr (diatomaceous earth) and later with sawdust, etc. Strength varied- usually low of 40% to high of 80% nitro (that was yer ditching dynamite) Sensitivity would either be so low would not go bang except hitting a metal plate at 90 degrees, or so high would go bang on firing.

    BTW, there WAS a brief period when there was an artillery piece known as a dynamite gun- Propellant powder pushed a piston that drove projectile out of gun. Projectile looked sorta like a small torpedo, was loaded with a form of dynamite. When other explosives (picric acid, TNT, etc) became available, they faded away. Navy even had one ship that main battery was 3 dynamite guns- steam propelled shell.
    0
  • Hawk Carse
    The Gun and its Development, by W.W. Greener describes a variety of explosive rifle shells. The "detonating compound" was carefully chosen to stand the launch from a black powder express rifle, but still detonate upon impact with, say, dangerous game.
    0
  • beantownshootah
    To address a few of the points made above, the question was about dynamite, which is a particular type of explosive made with nitroglycerin and a stabilizer (eg sawdust, diatomaceous earth, etc).

    In the 19th century, there weren't so many available, but nowadays there are explosives significantly more powerful than dynamite.

    So to some extent, these could overcome some of the limitations associated with small arms limited payloads. Obviously bigger rounds (eg shotgun slugs, .50 cal rounds, etc) can hold more explosive.

    And to be clear, the point of explosive bullets is NOT for use against people (ordinary bullets work just fine in that application, plus are far cheaper and safer), but against hardened targets and such.

    For example large caliber (ie non small arm) HEAT rounds (high-explosive anti-tank) are used to penetrate the hardened steel armor on tanks.
    0
  • partisan
    Dynamite will NOT explode from a hard blow! There HAS to be an igniter!
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity