Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Is .270 just your fathers caliber?

Comments

7 comments

  • Zaphodb17
    Sorry to hijack this heading, but before I could post, the moderators locked the thread. Nononsense, maybe you've answered it before, but could you run down the 4 SPLENDID rifles you have in your signature? Thanks
    0
  • sandwarrior
    quote:Originally posted by Zaphodb17
    Sorry to hijack this heading, but before I could post, the moderators locked the thread. Nononsense, maybe you've answered it before, but could you run down the 4 SPLENDID rifles you have in your signature? Thanks


    Sometimes it's tough to get nn to open up to great things. I'm guessing that the second and third rifles are a: (2) 1891 Argentino Cavalry Carbine and (3) Argentino 1909?

    The first and fourth are obviously well done customs based on miltary Mausers. nononsense could give you better insight as to what exactly those are.
    0
  • CapnMidnight
    I was at the range friday afternoon dialing in some customers hunting rifles, our deer season opened saturday. The place was crowded, all the last minute guys trying to get the ol' meatgetter on paper befor the big day. We have 5 benches, there was a 270 at every bench. Everyone from the guy who owns the local garden center to our trusted Washington State patrolman where shooting 270s. It might be different where your from, but out here in the Cascade mountains there's alot of 270s, and we eat alot of venison.
    W.D.
    0
  • nononsense
    Zaphodb17 & sandwarrior,

    Apparently I had forgotten to list the rifles when I originally posted this signature.

    From the top:

    BRNO VZ24 - .338 Win. Mag. (heavily customized)

    Mauser 1891 Engineers Carbine

    Mauser M1909 Argentine

    BRNO 22H in 8mm Mauser (heavily customized)

    Best.
    0
  • Zaphodb17
    Thanks Nononsense, Z
    0
  • sandwarrior
    quote:Originally posted by Zaphodb17
    Thanks Nononsense, Z


    Ditto![:D] Hey I was close on the second, and got the third right.[8D]

    Edit:

    quote:Originally posted by wpage
    Back on point. It sounds like from the 3rd iteration of the question on .270 going forward as a viable round past present and future...
    Actually I think since Zaphodb17 is relatively new he may not have known how to change a title. I do believe this post is regarding nononsenses fine rifles pictured in his signature space.
    0
  • wpage
    Back on point. It sounds like from the 3rd iteration of the question on .270 going forward as a viable round past present and future...
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity