Skip to main content
Thank you for your patience as we work through our high volume of requests. If you need assistance with 2FA, please provide the correct phone number in your ticket request so we can assist quicker.
Help Center Community Shop

Hornady Lock-N-Load Auto Charge Initial Review

Comments

9 comments

  • Rocky Raab
    I just reviewed that machine also, and all he said is true. I had no such problems, however.

    Try running the machine in Slow mode. It doesn't change the speed of the drop tube. What it does is give a longer "lead" before it shifts from fast dispense to trickle mode. The lead is about one grain in Normal mode and 1.5 grains in Slow. The lead is 0.5 grain in Fast.

    Some powders I tested would consistently overrun the set weight when run in Fast mode, but hit the target weight perfectly in Normal or Slow. It seems to depend on the powder density and type.
    0
  • 1988z01
    Thanks Rocky. I will try that here in a few. I am getting ready to work on some Hornets, and will be sure to try it out in a slow mode. I'm relatively please so far.
    0
  • dcs shooters
    I have the Lyman and use it in the house where the heat and AC are on. No problems with it throwing more that a tenth difference.
    0
  • Rocky Raab
    Just be advised that dispensing 1.5 grains of powder in Trickle can take a looooong time. I had some powders take over three MINUTES to run a single charge in Slow speed and Auto mode. It's FAR better to use Manual mode so you can use a Lee dipper or manual measure to get very close to your target weight, and then let the Hornady trickle it up.

    But again, that's all dependent on powder type. Most charges ran about 26 to 28 seconds from beginning to end - and that's just about the time it takes me to seat a bullet in the prior case and inspect the next one.
    0
  • 1988z01
    2ND RUN

    I just loaded 100 .22 Hornets with 9.5 grains of IMR 4198. I think I have fallen in love here. I slowed it down, and it was a lot cooler in the Load Room, so some of the variables I was worried about were not there.

    SOOOOOO, as far as I can say this time, I only had an average of 1.5 overloads out of ten. NOT BAD AT ALL. I used the AUTOMATIC DISPENSE MODE, and had NO PROBLEMS.

    I wish I could say my wife was as enthused about my new found efficiency as I am, but she AIN'T. I may do some 44's next. If anyone is considering one of these, I am sure you will not be disappointed. All the major ones boast .10 grain accuracy, and I wouldn't hesitate with any depending on the deal.

    IF ANYONE HAS ANY FURTHER TRICKS FOR THIS SCALE, I WOULD LOVE TO HEAR THEM.
    0
  • Rocky Raab
    Good report, although anybody who'd use 4831 in the Hornet has to have his judgment seriously questioned from the git go.
    0
  • 1988z01
    quote:Originally posted by Rocky Raab
    Good report, although anybody who'd use 4831 in the Hornet has to have his judgment seriously questioned from the git go.


    I meant IMR 4198. I started loading some .270 Winchesters right after, so I had 4831 on he brain. Everything has been corrected.
    0
  • Rocky Raab
    I'm not surprised. Happens to all of us (which is why ANY load data on the internet ought to be suspect!)
    0
  • 1988z01
    quote:Originally posted by Rocky Raab
    I'm not surprised. Happens to all of us (which is why ANY load data on the internet ought to be suspect!)


    Amen to that. I've seen some crazy loads, and a lot of folks that think a 100 grain bullet is just like any other 100 grain bullet, regardless of the manufacturer. Scary stuff can happen when you take this stuff for granted.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?