Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Interchangeable optics, rifle to rifle

Comments

10 comments

  • mark christian
    What type of rifle are we talking about? Hunting, target, military style semi auto?
    0
  • quickmajik
    Well, I dont see it happening as such, you'ed have to have an extemely good base or set of rings, and then remember the base zero for each rifle, and the scope itself would have to be of high enough quality to track accurately each time you switch.. I'd always check the zero with a few shots just to make sure..

    I think it would work..
    0
  • idahoducker
    Talley QD rings and bases might be a good place to start. However, you would have problems with that if the spacing between bases differed from gun to gun.
    0
  • rsnyder55
    As different rifles shoot diffently, I doubt if each would shot at the same point of aim, especially if they are different calibers as the drop would be different.

    For example, I have an HK-91, 93, and 94 between which I can use the same mount and scope, but none shoot at a zero for another.
    0
  • Alan Rushing
    Primarily "Western" and generally open, moderate distances of (150-250yds). And yes, I've harvested closer in when the opportunity presents, and further when the circumstances permit.

    (( I should have provided a bit more info to everyone. I'm not a neophyte, I've had a bit of varied hunting and shooting experiences, so I'm not coming into this from that angle or experience level. However, I am not an experienced long distance praire dog or tournament shooter .... very unfortunately for me, I know! ))

    I don't want my rifle, ammo or optics to be the limiting factor. I'd like a very good optical system (if possible) that I could readily switch to another rifle. Then I'd endeavor to approach my equipment's capabilities.

    I'd prefer to have an additional optical system that had ease of switching over to another caliber/rifle formate when indicatd or desireable.

    If I were primarily hunting thick brush, woods, even reasonably open timber, I'd manage with my current set-ups. I do have a number of close to moderate distance options.

    Most often I use bolt actions. I have 243, 25/06, 7Rem, 30/06. I believe in using the highest BC rounds that will get there and be effective. Have been getting interested in using another flat shooting, but heavier hitting round.

    Thanks Mark, for asking me to clarification.
    0
  • quickmajik
    Specific firearm platforms that you have in mind would be something you need to specify for us to better help you.

    For instance switching a scope form a long to a short bolt action without the proper scope base would be more problematic then switching a scope from guns of the same action length and bases.






    This scope might interest you..
    http://www.cdnninvestments.com/kahecl3scwre5.html
    0
  • Alan Rushing
    Mr. quickmajik and everyone else .... y'all giving a lot of food for thought!

    I was hoping that I might be able to choose when reloading, to approximate the ballistic/flight characteristics of several of my favorites.

    I can see where one would want to have the bases and rings, as well as the ring distances identical for each rifle. A need to have everything possible, identical. If not mandatory, for sure advantageous!

    Usually my optics set me back more than the rifle and loading components. I'd rather have a greater selection of rifles ..... more and better ammo, than needing to duplicate the same optics for each rifle!

    Any and all additional info, appreciated ....... thanks!
    0
  • Herschel
    Alan, You have described the system that Kuharsky and Bausch & Lomb scope mounts used in the 1950's and 1960's. The mounts had the windage and elevation adjustments in the base. These were designed for scopes with no internal adjustments so the W & E adjustments had to be external. There is no reason that you couldn't use the obsolete mounts and put a modern 1" tube scope in them. The bases can be found for rifles that were made in the 1950's and 1960's. This is the exact answer to what you are trying to achieve. The mounts were high quality. The B & L ring assembly came with two types of release catches. The earlier one had a spring loaded plunger that held the ring assembly to the base. The later, improved one, had a wing nut type catch that held the scope in place. You can do a search for Kuharsky or B & L scope mounts on the auction and some will surely show up.
    0
  • RCrosby
    +1 Hershel,
    That's the only solution I know of that really fits your criteria. Other than that, assuming identical ring spacing, you can zero your scope for one rifle, then record the necessary adjustments needed to bring it in line on the other(s). A bit of a pain, but certainly do-able.
    0
  • givette
    Contact Griffin & Howe. Masters of the quick-detach mounting system. I have one for my M1A, and it is quite adequate. My mount was made by Army Ordnance Command, to enable the use of the M1C scope setup. It uses the 'railroad track' sliding type fitment with locking lugs.

    Now, the folks at Bernardsville, NJ (G&H) will fabricate a mount for your particular receiver, and will true it to the bore. You can have it done for every rifle you want the QD capability. Then you can change out the upper part (that has the scope) rifle-to-rifle.

    Vintage, Classic, and Expensive. But you'll be all the talk of the range. Got the dough? Make it count!!! Best, Joe
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity