Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

Legality of an M1D

Comments

4 comments

  • Spider7115
    Yes. The ban applies to so-called "assault weapons" manufactured after September, 1994.
    0
  • dfletcher
    As I understand it - and I may be wrong because in CA the '94 AWB is dead, replaced by our own screwed up law - but the combo of FH and bayonet lug is the offending part in NY? Does the M1 Garand not having a detach magazine make any difference?

    If the bayonet lug and FH hider combination is an issue it's easy enough to remove one of the features without permanently altering the gun.
    0
  • givette
    The '92 AWB (that NY still adheres to) starts with:
    "A semi-auto rifle that has a detachable magazine"...

    If your rifle doesn't meet both of the qualifications of above paragraph, it's not a banned rifle.

    For instance:
    M1 Garand..good to go. No detachable magazine. Does not qualify. You can put any and all 'evil' features on the rifle.

    British enfield..good to go. No semi-auto action. Pistol grip/collapsible stock etc. is Okay also, because the Enfield is not one of the rifles that the ban focus on.

    Remember: it has to be both 1. Semi-auto, and 2. Uses a detachable magazine.

    Best, Joe

    EDIT
    Spider touched on another aspect: any rifle with 'evil' features mf'd prior to the ban is Okay to own/posess. NY grandfathers rifles made prior to the ban. (By made, I mean by SerNo lookup to determine just exactly when your particular rifle was made). Best again, Joe
    0
  • v35
    The flash hider should be a clamp on style.
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity