Skip to main content
Live chat will not be available on Monday, September 7th in observance of Labor day. We will reply to your request as soon as possible.
Help Center Community Shop

Pre64 Mod. 70 butt plates

Comments

6 comments

  • GuvamintCheese
    Winchester used a plastic butt plate in 1962 and it did not have any writing on it just checkering. It would also be correct for the butt plate to be slightly undersized (the wood is slightly proud). My only question is, did winchester put a recoil pad on these late magnum guns??

    I will Check my Riflemans Rifle book for you and let you know.

    Just checked and your gun is correct with that plate!
    0
  • snickers
    Without being able to see the butt plate it is hard to say if it has been replaced. I would say from what you have described that it is correct. If it is a slight bit smaller than the stock it is probably a good way to be fairly certain that the stock has not been sanded for a refinish. Iwould be much more wary if it had a pad installed.
    0
  • Ambrose
    My 1961 .264 has a butt plate exactly as you describe. It is origional. It also has a slight curve to it.
    0
  • Kingfisher1
    Much Thanks to all of you who responded. I guess it is more "original" than I had expected. Now, if I can only come up with the $ for that darned book!

    Kingfisher1
    0
  • brotus2
    Welcome. I have a '52 with the aluminum plate. Hell of a gun. 270.
    0
  • Madman
    Brotus;
    Yours should be a Featherweight and later in 1952 production as the featherweight came out mid '52. My .308 is just about mid year production...my 300 H&H has an aftermarket pad of '52 vintage. The original '52 production was a metal pad. Cartod knows his pre-64 70's.
    Kingfisher, welcome. Rule and Whiticker books can be found on sleazebay at times and go for 200-300/ea. The only way I got mine many years ago and the prices have only gone up.

    Paul
    Mountain Magic Gunsmithing
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity