Skip to main content
Help Center Community Shop

.223 primer ? CCI 400 or 41

Comments

7 comments

  • Rocky Raab
    I'm not an AR guy, but the CCI 41 is made for semi-autos with free-floating firing pins because of the danger of a slam fire. The cups are harder. Most reloaders have no problems whatever with the regular 400 primer, but if you experience even one slam fire, you'll be a believer in the #41.

    Winchester primers are also pretty tough, but I would NOT use the Federal because it is significantly more sensitive than the others.
    0
  • JustC
    I would use the 41
    0
  • Mobuck
    I use the #41 exclusively in reloads tha might be used in an AR. In testing, I've found loads with the #41 are not as accurate as the same load with #400 and the powder charge must be reduced slightly. Regardless, I feel the safety factor is more important.
    0
  • BHAVIN
    While I understand the reasoning for the #41 we have shot 10's of thousands of rounds in AR15 and M16's/M4 rifles and have never had any issues. We usually use Winchester & CCI but in the primer crunch we used several brands.

    I use LC brass, 55g bullets with H335. Great combo.
    0
  • guntech59
    I use the CCI 400s and have never had a problem with them.

    Powder.....wow, there's alot of them that are good for your application. I am happy with W748 and IMR 8208 XBR. The 8208 works best (for me) with bullets that are 55gr and under.
    0
  • 62fuelie
    I have been using the CCI 450 magnum primer and WW748 for 5.56 loads with the 60 grain V-Max. Never had a slam-fire (knocking wood). I also use this primer on my 6.8 SPC with SS or Hornady brass with the small primer pocket. I like the longer flame of the mag primer and just reduce my load by 1/2 grain to compensate.
    0
  • skyfish
    I use the CCI400, never an issue yet in my ARs'
    0

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Recent Activity

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?