Help identify this old rolling block
This old rifle has been in a friends family for years. It has almost no markings on it. The only marks are behind the front sight and says....... G. K. Pierce
Grand Rapids
Serial number is behind the trigger guard and reads 25809.
The barrel is 1 1/4 inch octagonal stock and measures 29 1/4" from breech face to end of barrel. Total length of rifle is 45 1/2". The barrel is rusted up unfortunately, I'm working on cleaning it out so the chamber measurements are a bit rough to figure out. The diameter is about .505" and head space around 2.11". It appears to be a .44 or .45 caliber. Has a wooden cleaning rod under the barrel. It also has two dove tails cut into the barrel for the front sight??????
Here's a bunch of pictures. We are both really curious about the old thing. Thanks for any expertise. John













Grand Rapids
Serial number is behind the trigger guard and reads 25809.
The barrel is 1 1/4 inch octagonal stock and measures 29 1/4" from breech face to end of barrel. Total length of rifle is 45 1/2". The barrel is rusted up unfortunately, I'm working on cleaning it out so the chamber measurements are a bit rough to figure out. The diameter is about .505" and head space around 2.11". It appears to be a .44 or .45 caliber. Has a wooden cleaning rod under the barrel. It also has two dove tails cut into the barrel for the front sight??????
Here's a bunch of pictures. We are both really curious about the old thing. Thanks for any expertise. John













0
-
It's G. R. Pierce; from an article about Grand Rapids Gunsmiths:
" About 1858, or a little earlier, George R. Pierce opened a gunsmith shop on Monroe street below Waterloo."
The 1860 and 1870 G.R. censuses list him as a gunsmith born about 1830 New York.
He may have rebarreled an action with the heavy target barrel, or only retailed the gun. You might carefully tap out the wedge and remove the forend and see if barrel is marked underneath.
A chamber cast should determine what it's chambered for, but if you mean chamber length instead of headspace, the dimensions you list are about right for .45-70.0 -
Interesting rifle, I believe that's a Whitney action and not a Remington. 0 -
I will venture a guess that your barrel originated
from a muzzle loader, as the turned down muzzle you
pictured was commonly done to accommodate a bullet
starter.
Johnny0 -
quote:Originally posted by JohnnyBGood
I will venture a guess that your barrel originated
from a muzzle loader, as the turned down muzzle you
pictured was commonly done to accommodate a bullet
starter.
Johnny
While your guess might be well and true, it was common during the late 19th century for target shooters to muzzle load their bullets while using breach loaded metallic cartridges for the charge.
The thought behind loading the bullets from the muzzle was two fold:
1) it assured the barrel was clean of any fowling
2) the bullet was seated in the lands of the rifling.0 -
quote:Originally posted by iceracerx
quote:Originally posted by JohnnyBGood
I will venture a guess that your barrel originated
from a muzzle loader, as the turned down muzzle you
pictured was commonly done to accommodate a bullet
starter.
Johnny
While your guess might be well and true, it was common
during the late 19th century for target shooters to muzzle
load their bullets while using breach loaded metallic
cartridges for the charge.
The thought behind loading the bullets from the muzzle was
two fold:
1) it assured the barrel was clean of any fowling
2) the bullet was seated in the lands of the rifling.
Yes, you are correct, and I am well aware of such loading
procedures. However, such loading was done using a false
muzzle as pictured below. A big benefit of the false
muzzle was that it would accumulate the wear of repeated
loadings while preserving the very important rifling at
the muzzle of the actual barrel.
The Rolling Block under discussion here does not have a false
muzzle but a bullet starter, two different things. Nor is this
Rolling Block anywhere near a Schuetzen type target rifle.
Then again, we could both be wrong and the turned down muzzle
on the Rolling Block was done to accommodate a bayonet! [:0]
Johnny0 -
Thanks for the replies. I sent the pictures and description to National Firearms Museum and here is there response.
John:
Thank you for your inquiry to the National Firearms Museum.
George Richmond Pierce operated in Grand Rapids from 1852 to 1875 and the barrel follows the profile of one of his percussion target rifles from that period. The rounded barrel step was intended for use with a false muzzle in loading. The now missing original front sight would have been a much more elaborate item.
The action that this rifle is built from started life as a Remington No. 1 rolling block carbine and by the configuration of the now-missing frame sling swivel point, it was likely a foreign contract gun - possibly for Mexico or Argentina. But more than a million Remington rolling blocks were made and the contract markings were usually on the barrel. The serial number on the bottom of the tang is found also with foreign contract arms. The irregular numbering there points more towards Mexico than anywhere else. These actions started coming on the market as surplus just before the turn of the last century.
What this piece looks like is a gunsmith combined gun utilizing available parts. Remington actions were popular for building Gemmer-style sporters well before modern single-shot competition interest began. Possibly a gunsmith in the time period from 1890 to 1940 took an old .45 muzzleloading barrel, rechambered it for metallic cartridges, threaded it and fitted it to the Remington action. The stocking would have been done at the same time.
National Firearms Museum0 -
Custom rifle built on Whitney rolling block action. 0 -
quote:Originally posted by cbyerly
Custom rifle built on Whitney rolling block action.
I agree, as MP also noted earlier, it's a Whitney action, not a Remington, distinguished by the hammer and breechblock pins that have tabs or ears held by a central screw, and the extra screw below same.0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
8 comments