stevens model 67 12 gauge-failure to eject
hello to all,
im new here and looking for answers obviously!!
got an ol' model 67 stevens im redoing, and the thing isnt wanting to eject shells. now, i thought i had diagnosed the issue, and replaced the ejector, but alas.....it wasnt the issue. now upon closer inspection, and had i been paying closer attention, it seems, that perhaps the culprit, or should i say culprits, were the extractors. seems they feed the shell nicely into the chamber, and pull it out every time, but once to the rear of the receiver where the shell should make contact with the ejector they let loose of the shell so that it will not eject from the receiver. now i guess my question is this....does that sound like a reasonable diagnosis or am i missing something? just second guessing my self, and trying to be sure. the little itty bity parts for replacement are a little pricey so id like to get it right. any and all help/advice will be most appreciated.
thank you much!!!
im new here and looking for answers obviously!!
got an ol' model 67 stevens im redoing, and the thing isnt wanting to eject shells. now, i thought i had diagnosed the issue, and replaced the ejector, but alas.....it wasnt the issue. now upon closer inspection, and had i been paying closer attention, it seems, that perhaps the culprit, or should i say culprits, were the extractors. seems they feed the shell nicely into the chamber, and pull it out every time, but once to the rear of the receiver where the shell should make contact with the ejector they let loose of the shell so that it will not eject from the receiver. now i guess my question is this....does that sound like a reasonable diagnosis or am i missing something? just second guessing my self, and trying to be sure. the little itty bity parts for replacement are a little pricey so id like to get it right. any and all help/advice will be most appreciated.
thank you much!!!
0
-
CHECK YOUR EXTRACTOR SPRINGS, THE R.H. EXTRACTOR SHOULD HAVE A SHARP 'HOOK' WHILE THE L.H. EXTRACTOR SHOULD HAVE MORE OF A 'RAMP'. 0 -
thanks alot, i will give em a look see!! 0
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
2 comments